Sentences with phrase «understands uncertainties in climate science»

• Industry senor leadership understands uncertainties in climate science, making them stronger ambassadors to those who shape climate policy.

Industry senior leadership understands uncertainties in climate science, making them stronger ambassadors to those who shape climate policy

* Average citizens «understand» (recognize) uncertainties in climate science; recognition of uncertainties becomes part of the «conventional wisdom» * Media «understands» (recognizes) uncertainties in climate science * Media coverage reflects balance on climate science and recognition of the validity of viewpoints that challenge the current «conventional wisdom» * Industry senior leadership understands uncertainties in climate science, making them stronger ambassadors to those who shape climate policy * Those promoting the Kyoto treaty on the basis of extent science appears to be out of touch with reality.

«Victory will be achieved when average citizens understand uncertainties in climate science...»

In 1998, the American Petroleum Institute developed an internal Communications Action Plan that stated: Victory will be achieved when & average citizens understand uncertainties in climate science & [and] recognition of uncertainties becomes part of the conventional wisdom.

In a lame effort to fill out the TRNN video with other material which looked like fossil fuel industry orchestrating things, a line from the American Petroleum Institute's 1998 leaked «Global Climate Science Communications Team» memo was highlighted, while the narrator read it: «Victory will be achieved when average citizens understand uncertainties in climate science.»

Not exact matches

We've reached a point now in the interdisciplinary growth of our science where we've got climate scientists, who understand the physics of climate and how that translates to uncertainties, working hand in hand with economists who will run the projected impacts through a cost - benefit analysis.

Two papers published in Science, from scientists from the Universities of Washington and Oxford, discuss the role of uncertainty in current understanding of climate change, and our future efforts to tackle it.

Paul Voosen, one of the most talented journalists probing human - driven climate change and related energy issues, has written an award - worthy two - part report for Greenwire on one of the most enduring sources of uncertainty in climate science — how the complicated response of clouds in a warming world limits understanding of how hot it could get from a given rise in greenhouse gas concentrations:

According to Richard's analysis, the 485 new papers underscore the «significant limitations and uncertainties inherent in our understanding of climate and climate changes,» which in turn suggests that climate science is not nearly as settled as media reports and some policymakers would have people believe.

To address global warming as «enmeshed in scientific uncertainty» is to recognize the limitations of our understanding of climate science.

«Victory will be achieved when... average citizens «understand» (recognize) uncertainties in climate science; recognition of uncertainties becomes part of the «conventional wisdom».»

Nature: Understanding how the South Asian monsoon will change in response to global warming and resolving the uncertainties in projected changes are «demanding tasks» for climate science, a review says.

Meanwhile, the good news (if further research bears it out) that the world's warming has been slowed, at least for a few years, needs to be leavened with the realisation, yet again, that there are significant uncertainties in science's understanding of the climate — and thus unquantifiable risks ahead.

These interests intersect in climate change, as rational choice of the best course of action requires our best effort at understanding the science of climate, including an appreciation of the uncertainties.

First, while it is important to understand the remaining uncertainties in climate science, it is critical to also realize how much we do understand about the climate.

With the exception of the 1991 ICE memos — which I will get to shortly — the next most favored leaked memo phrase is the one out of the 1998 API documents, «Victory will be achieved when... Average citizens «understand» (recognize) uncertainties in climate science...» That isn't a sinister industry directive, it is a basic truism.

We have the «scientist» who understands the questions, uncertainties and doubts that are inherent in Climate Science with the scientific ethos of full disclosure of all those, and the «human being» who for the good of the planet must address the non scientific audience with dramatic, simplified, scary and non realistic scenarios.

As the company put it in a secret 1998 memo helping establish one of the innumerable front groups that spread climate disinformation, «Victory will be achieved when average citizens «understand» (recognize) uncertainties in climate science,» and when «recognition of uncertainty becomes part of the «conventional wisdom.»»

There is a tremendous amount of uncertainty in climate science, and while most climate scientists and many others understand this and operate rationally with this understanding, it is a huge political issue.

Climate science consists of a very large number of pieces, extending from deep in the understood sections of the puzzle, where they fit perfectly with all of accepted physics, out to regions on the boundary where there is still uncertainty.

According to the plan «Victory will be achieved when average citizens «understand» (recognize) uncertainties in climate science; recognition of uncertainties becomes part of the «conventional wisdom».»

Emotive orthodoxy wipes out this defence, and explains why (as Kahan finds) folks get * more * polarized on CAGW as they get more science literate; initial bias vectors them either further into orthodoxy, or to a better understanding of the genuine uncertainties (this aspect is covered in my guest post here at Climate Etc. on 30th January this year).

I think it would help you if you read a little physics and climate science so you understand better the place of uncertainty and parameter estimation in both.

HAS suggests: «I think it would help you if you read a little physics and climate science so you understand better the place of uncertainty and parameter estimation in both.

In my Uncertainty Monster paper, I made scientific and pragmatic arguments for understanding, assessing and reasoning about uncertainty in climate sciencIn my Uncertainty Monster paper, I made scientific and pragmatic arguments for understanding, assessing and reasoning about uncertainty in climaUncertainty Monster paper, I made scientific and pragmatic arguments for understanding, assessing and reasoning about uncertainty in climauncertainty in climate sciencin climate science.

As Dr. Curry has said, climate science is in its infancy, and uncertainties about such things as this are not as well understood as are say the steam tables.