Not exact matches
Both exhibitions subscribe to a broadened conceptually - geared view of drawing: drawing is not
understood as a secondary medium to the work of the
artists a mere preparatory sketch, but
as hierarchically equal and autonomous media within which the
conceptual and creative basis of an artistic position is articulated.
Given Rauschenberg's known lack of financial resources in the 1950s and his propensity for reusing canvases, it is likely that the White Paintings began to be remade and repainted almost immediately after their completion in fall 1951, a fact that testifies to the
artist's
understanding of these works
as primarily
conceptual rather than material.
The
conceptual nature of the Impressionism movement and how it passed on to influence the Post-Impressionism
artists is seen
as one of the major shifts in regard to the
understanding of the painting, its compositional rules and how one should break them, and it offered a new
understanding towards the subject matter and what is considered important enough to be painted.
EXILE presents
artists of different generations, often setting these in dialogue with each other and
understands art
as a collaborative, inter-generational and overarching discourse embedded in a complex web of socio - political, gender and personal histories
as much
as in aesthetic theory and
conceptual practice.
While the works created by these
artists have previously been contextualized in terms of associations and movements ranging from Fluxus to
Conceptual Art to the blanketed arena of contemporary art practice, in Radical Presence they will be presented along a trajectory providing general audiences and scholars alike, a critical
understanding of the significance and persistence of black performance
as a stand - alone practice.
Frederic Tuten I
understand that you started
as a
conceptual artist.
Exile presents
artists of different generations, often setting these in dialogue with each other and
understands art
as a collaborative, inter-generatioal and overarching discourse embedded in a complex web of socio - political, gender and personal histories
as much
as in aesthetic theory and
conceptual practice.
Sehgal's interpretations of the dance aesthetics of twenty of the greatest choreographers of the modern era, including Pina Bausch, Trisha Brown, Merce Cunningham, Isadora Duncan, Martha Graham, Yvonne Rainer, and Le Roy, represented for the
artist a transformation from his past experience in choreographing a single, discrete piece into what might be
understood as a
conceptual artwork - exhibition of collected performances — in his words, «a museum of dance» 2 incarnate.
Because Singer was trained in sculpture rather than architecture, design, or even painting, this can be
understood as operating in a way similar to how graph paper functioned for the»60s generation of minimal and
conceptual artists.
Gaines's keynote concerned art
as an aesthetic practice versus art
as a cultural practice, and
as he dug into the work of Adrian Piper and a group he termed «first - generation
Conceptual artists,» he related the stakes of reading, teaching, and
understanding artwork in the twenty - first century.
With
artists such
as Donald Judd, Dan Flavin, Eva Hesse, Sol LeWitt and Robert Morris, Andre redefined our
understanding of sculpture, moving the significance of the practice from material to
conceptual levels.
If we consider this book on a
conceptual level,
as with his paintings, the lessons are not so much about color
as they are about the fact that humans are limited in what they can perceive, and if
artists can
understand those limitations they can potentially expand the perceptual range of those who encounter their work.
Lozano's abstract paintings, reaching a peak of geometrical clarity in 1965, were explorations in the
artist's
understanding of space; similar work was being done by the
conceptual and minimalist
artists of the era, such
as Donald Judd, Sol Lewitt, and Mel Bochner.
Whether it be language
as artmaking material (
as is the case with Lawrence Weiner's work), the wall drawings of Sol LeWitt (where the instructions for carrying out a piece are
as crucial
as the drawing itself), or the often dense and always rich writings of the British group Art & Language (their essays being best
understood as art), recent art history is brimming with
artists engaging with language in order to better elucidate a specific
conceptual and aesthetic sensibility.
Henri Matisse is a really foundational
artist for me,
as is late 1960s American and European
conceptual art, certain Arte Povera
artists,
as well
as French and German painting of the 1960s through to the»80s — Yves Klein, Daniel Buren, Martin Barre, Olivier Mosset, Blinky Palermo, Gerhard Richter, Martin Kippenberger, Imi Knoebel, Sigmar Polke — not to mention many non-art practices, such
as design, writing and music... I haven't ever really felt or even
understood the need to situate myself in any lineage, other than a sort of elective affinities grouping, which is maybe a very contemporary luxury for an
artist.
During the early 1970s he studied with
conceptual artist Joseph Beuys, whose interest in using an array of cultural myths, metaphors, and personal symbolic vocabulary
as a means to engage and
understand history inspired Kiefer.
At others times the works point towards the broader
conceptual and ideological framework of the studio, the
artist, the gallery, the curator, and the artwork itself — each of which are
understood (at least by these
artists)
as being in flux and negotiable.