Nobody wants to see frequent Holy Communion disappear from the lives of Catholics, but it is equally necessary that Holy Communion should once again be
understood as a sacrament to be received with due preparation, in a state of grace, and in a state of life that accords with the teaching of Christ and the Church.
Not exact matches
This concentration in Jesus» teaching upon his action made it possible for the disciples to conceive of his death also
as divine action, which in turn led to the primitive Christian
sacraments as custodians of «Jesus»
understanding of himself».
I see two indications: recent developments in sacramental theology have helped us to
understand the
sacraments more clearly
as divine actions, and the new sacramental services of the major denominations have made this
understanding much more explicit for all to grasp.
These two
sacraments can be
understood as closely linked to the two-fold meaning of salvation which we have already considered — penance leading to the forgiveness of sin committed after baptism, and the Eucharist leading to the fullness of God's own life.
It would be a great mistake to
understand Bonhoeffer
as abolishing the worshipping church and replacing service and
sacrament by acts of charity.
The
sacraments in general are treated by Jenson
as «mysteries of communion» in accordance with the New Testament
understanding of the mystery uniting Christ and his Church.
The first finding appears to exclude women on the grounds that deaconesses were not admitted to the same office
as deacons, and the second finding names the problem the ordination of women
as deacons would pose for
understanding the unity of the
sacrament.
The church historically has
understood marriage
as a
sacrament, an adventure into impossible commitment which has divine sanction, encouragement and blessing.
(Kimel also betrays ignorance of contemporary liturgical scholarship when he uses the term «command,» harking back to Reformation
understandings of the
sacraments as «ordinances» we must obey rather than gifts for which we give thanks.)
Perhaps you don't quite
understand that the church is the bride of Christ, in other words, we have to make ourselves worthy of Christ (just
as any person must make themself worthy of their spouse), and we do it by making ourselves holy, thru the church's
sacraments, but the church is not an end in itself; Christ is the end.
The Pope said «It is my hope that your conversations will bear abundant fruit in the examination of such historically controversial issues
as the relationship between Scripture and Tradition, the
understanding of baptism and the
sacraments, the place of Mary in the communion of the Church, and the nature of oversight and primacy in the Church's ministerial structure.
Preaching lies very near the
sacrament and is to be
understood as opening mind and heart in faith to receive the
sacrament.
As St. Thomas held, «a
sacrament in causing grace works after the manner of an instrument» (ST III, q. 62, a. 5), and it is only in this sense that the Society
understands the «instrumentality» of the
sacraments.
Toward the end of Ut Unum Sint, John Paul cites some of the questions that must be addressed in conversation with the communities issuing from the tragic divisions of the sixteenth century: (1) The relationship between Sacred Scripture,
as the highest authority in matters of faith, and Sacred Tradition,
as indispensable to the interpretation of the Word of God; (2) The Eucharist
as the
Sacrament of the Body and Blood of Christ, an offering of praise to the Father, the sacrificial memorial and Real Presence of Christ and the sanctifying outpouring of the Holy Spirit; (3) Ordination,
as a
Sacrament, to the threefold ministry of the episcopate, presbyterate, and diaconate; (4) The Magisterium of the Church, entrusted to the pope and the bishops in communion with him,
understood as a responsibility and an authority exercised in the name of Christ for teaching and safeguarding the faith; (5) The Virgin Mary,
as Mother of God and Icon of the Church, the spiritual Mother who intercedes for Christ's disciples and for all humanity.
But it seems to me that, if we want a «core» around which to build our
understanding of the Redemption, we can not do better than to start with Jesus» own teaching
as recorded by St. John, and see the Cross
as the revelation of God's love, a revelation powerful enough to bring us the re-creating Love it reveals, a revelation that is applied to us in the
Sacraments and especially in the HolyEucharist.
Dionysius defines a hierarchy
as «a sacred order, a state of
understanding and an activity approximating
as closely
as possible to the divine... It reaches out to grant every being, according to merit, a share of light and then through a divine
sacrament, in harmony and in peace, it bestows on each of those being perfected its own form.»
Then, if one is religious, you go to your faith community and participate in a marriage ceremony
as your tradition dictates and
understands that
sacrament.
According to Ratzinger, to
understand the Church merely
as sacrament and
as the people of God is to see her in a predominantly masculine sense.4 He believes that the feminine dimension is essential in that it clarifies and deepens the concept of the Church.
Reading,
understanding and retelling their stories is vital to the health of the Church and should indeed be exciting and encouraging
as we ask similar questions, face similar dilemmas, and — above all — worship the same triune God through the preaching of the same Word and the administration of the same
sacraments.
«There is a need to grasp again, refresh and deepen the Church's
understanding of marriage
as a
sacrament.
The tendency to
understand «worship» more narrowly
as limited to the «proclamation of the Word» and «the celebration of the
sacraments» is understandable.
The Anglican position was made clearer by the work of the Tractarian movement in the 19th century, which emphasised a Catholic
understanding of the
sacrament as an actual washing away of sin, a regeneration and renewal by the Holy Spirit and an incorporation into the Church.
She suggests that the
sacrament of penance leads us «to
understand individual wrongdoing not in legalistic terms
as a violation of the law (which it sometimes is) but
as a violation of relationships.»
Positively, he concerned himself with the education of priests in Italy, exhorted clergy the world over to aspire to what he set forth
as the standard for the perfect parish priest, encouraged frequent, even daily Communion by the laity, urged that children be admitted to that
sacrament as soon
as they
understood the simple doctrines of the Church, stressed Christian marriage and family life, had the breviary reworked to make it more useful and to ensure the recitation of the whole Psalter each week, and enjoined devotion to Mary.
Some of the crucial points were those which are once again being anxiously turned over by the twentieth - century Catholic Church — the nature of the Christian priesthood the proper
understanding of the eucharist,
as an act of the Christian Church, the nature of
sacraments and the proper place of «the Word of God».
This word can not be
understood as referring to the
sacrament of penance, that is, confession and satisfaction
as admistered by the clergy.
Furthermore, «in the primordial awareness of the nuptial meaning of the body... there is constituted a primordial
sacrament understood as a sign that transmits effectively in the visible world the invisible mystery.»
To this extent it is theologically legitimate to
understand the
sacraments as the most radical and most intensive instance of God's word
as a word of the church when this word represents an absolute involvement of the church and is what is called opus operatum.
«The Church can not therefore be
understood as the mystical body of Christ,
as the sign of man's covenant with God in Christ, or
as the universal
sacrament of salvation unless we keep in mind the «great mystery» involved in the creation of man
as male and female and the vocation to conjugal love, to fatherhood and to motherhood.»
[26] The Pope confronts the notion of marriage
as the remedium concupiscientiae [27] saying that it must be
understood in the integral sense of the scriptures which also teach of the Redemption of the Body and point to the
sacrament of matrimony
as a way of realizing that Redemption.
But it also rejected the
understanding of the
sacrament as a miracle of transubstantiation.