The lay vocation, as
understood by Evangelical Catholicism, is primarily one of evangelism: of the family, the workplace, and the neighborhood, and thus of culture, economics, and politics, bringing the gospel into all of those parts of the world to which the laity have greater access than those who are ordained.
The reality of God, as
understood by Evangelicals, is made plausible by particularly strong social support.
Not exact matches
While the priesthood of all believers was used
by the reformers to buttress an
evangelical understanding of the church over against the clericalism and sacerdotalism of medieval Catholicism, the ecclesial context of this Reformation principle has often been eclipsed within major sectors of the Protestant tradition.
Having shared the great grace of baptism and having been appropriately catechized into «the mysteries,»
evangelical Catholics
understand, appreciate, and live the biblical truth of Christian vocation as given
by St. Paul: «Now there are varieties of gifts, but the same Spirit; and there are varieties of service, but the same Lord; and there are varieties of working, but it is the same God who inspires them all in every one.
As
Evangelicals and Catholics fully committed to our respective heritages, we affirm together the coinherence of Scripture and tradition: tradition is not a second source of revelation alongside the Bible but must ever be corrected and informed
by it, and Scripture itself is not
understood in a vacuum apart from the historical existence and life of the community of faith.
By and large
evangelicals don't
understand or appreciate the Church calendar, or really an
understanding that throughout Scripture and throughout human history God has used feast, fast and festivals to shape His people.
-- like the Republican
evangelicals who all think their church is the most Christian, the most right, the only ones going to heaven yet ignore the real teachings of Jesus
by judging others, ignoring charity and the needs of their community, not
understanding when the Lord's Prayer begins with «Our» Father — the «Our» is not just white people.
The literalist mentality does not manifest itself only in conservative churches, private - school enclaves, television programs of the
evangelical right, and a considerable amount of Christian bookstore material; one often finds a literalist
understanding of Bible and faith being assumed
by those who have no religious inclinations, or who are avowedly antireligious in sentiment.
A Peculiar People: The Church as Culture in a Post-Christian Society
by Rodney Clapages InterVarsity, 251 pages, $ 14.99 paper A prolific
evangelical Protestant writer, Clapp proposes an
understanding of «church as way of life» along lines made familiar
by the work of Stanley Hauerwas.
Like The Gift of Salvation statement issued
by Evangelicals and Catholics Together in 1997, the Joint Declaration represents a measure of convergence between Catholic and Reformational
understandings of that article of faith
by which the Church either stands or falls, to quote a favorite Lutheran saying.
I stumbled into the
evangelical world
by a kind of accident 15 years ago when some colleagues and I wanted to
understand how the culture of a seminary shapes the ministers who are formed there.
But while Lindsell obviously intends to meet these concerns, his book is actually a repristination (and often less subtle than earlier expressions) of a particular timebound formulation of biblical authority that is being seen
by increasing numbers of
evangelicals not only to have outlived its usefulness but to have become a positive hindrance to the
understanding of the fuller and deeper significance of the Scriptures.
It is, in particular, the second of evangelicalism's two tenets, i. e., Biblical authority, that sets
evangelicals off from their fellow Christians.8 Over against those wanting to make tradition co-normative with Scripture; over against those wanting to update Christianity
by conforming it to the current philosophical trends; over against those who view Biblical authority selectively and dissent from what they find unreasonable; over against those who would
understand Biblical authority primarily in terms of its writers» religious sensitivity or their proximity to the primal originating events of the faith; over against those who would consider Biblical authority subjectively, stressing the effect on the reader, not the quality of the source — over against all these,
evangelicals believe the Biblical text as written to be totally authoritative in all that it affirms.
The word «
evangelical» distinguishes that group in Christendom whose dedication to the gospel is expressed in a personal faith in Christ as Lord and whose
understanding of the gospel is defined solely
by Scripture, the written Word of God.
Spelled out in a lengthy lead editorial entitled «
Evangelicals in the Social Struggle,» as well as in books such as Aspects of Christian Social Ethics, Henry's
understanding of Christian social responsibility stressed (a) society's need for the spiritual regeneration of all men and women, (b) an interim social program of humanitarian care, ethical proclamation, and personal, structural application, and (c) a theory of limited government centering on certain «freedom rights,» e. g., the rights to public property, free speech, and so on.18 Though the shape of this social ethic thus closely parallels that of the present editorial position of Moody Monthly, it must be distinguished from its counterpart
by the time period involved (it pushed others like Moody Monthly into a more active involvement in the social arena),
by the intensity of its commitment to social responsibility,
by the sophistication of its insight into political theory and practice, and
by its willingness to offer structural critique on the American political system.
And yet, as the years went
by, I soon learned that to be a woman in the conservative
evangelical subculture is to never quite
understand your place in this world.
Intensely aware of, but disturbed
by, the pattern of self - segregation among young Korean American
evangelicals, Ecklund is less interested in
understanding the roots of their religious behavior than in analyzing its consequences for American civic life.
Modern
evangelicals do need to «bridge the gap» and speak more plainly about their faith in terms that everyone can
understand rather than assume that what they
understand among themselves will be automatically
understood by those who are not of their community when they speak to others about their faith.
Best Analysis: Karl Giberson at The Huffington Post with «Why
Evangelicals Are Fooled Into Accepting Pseudoscience» «The relentless assaults on the integrity of science
by groups like the Discovery Institute have made it impossible for many people to
understand the significance of a «scientific consensus.»
In the area of Gospel and culture, in contrast to the basic
understanding of the Gospel as represented
by western missions, which was to all intents and purposes a non - negotiable given, the
evangelicals speak of the necessity for churches in the non-western world to find indigenous expression of Christianity in ways appropriate to people's culture and traditions.
is to
understand why the
evangelicals could have come to the view that their own emphases were more likely to be conserved and stated with a more positively biblical note on such matters as proclamation and witness
by the Roman Catholic Church than
by the WCC».16
Evangelicals in the various Holiness, Wesleyan, and Arminian traditions are, one may suggest, much closer to the Catholic
understanding of the relationship between justification and sanctification than they are to the more rigorous Lutheran and Calvinist champions of «justification
by faith alone.»
Black American politics is still largely inspired
by religion and often led
by clergy, usually of charismatic and
evangelical bent; black political rhetoric can not be
understood except in the context of biblical thought and imagery.
Conservative
evangelicals who interpret revelation in terms of the love embodied in and taught
by Jesus Christ will not be too different from Christians in old - line churches who also
understand God in terms of this same love.
The growing difference within evangelicalism regarding contextualization is described helpfully
by David Wells in his essay: «In the one
understanding of contextualization, the revelatory trajectory moves only from authoritative Word into contemporary culture; in the other, the trajectory moves both from text to context and from context to text...» Increasingly,
evangelicals are opting for the second of these models - an «interactionist» approach, to use William Dymess» terminology.
Whatever the religion of those in the «middle ground» the place where we find most Catholics, mainline Protestants, Jews and even many
evangelicals — they can not get
by forever
by arguing the theology of «choice» and «rights,» while refusing to sharpen their
understandings of «values» about «life.»
The phenomenal success of the electronic church in recent years is, I think, best
understood by coming to grips with the reality that
evangelical faith has indeed been a persistent and significant component of American culture.
After that, the possibilities for mutual
understanding created unintentionally
by American
Evangelical missionaries disappeared, and hostility between the Islamic world and the rest of the globe returned, continuing to the present.
But a 53 - year - old former bishop of an Definitions Of Online Dating Dating Sites Nz Review
Evangelical Christian Dating Sites The Institute's work is guided
by a disciplined
understanding of the interrelationship between the inner life and resources of American religious institutions.
Dating Sites Nz Review
Evangelical Christian Dating Sites The Institute's work is guided
by a disciplined
understanding of the interrelationship between the inner life and resources of American religious institutions.
Evangelical Christian Dating Sites The Institute's work is guided
by a disciplined
understanding of the interrelationship between the inner life and resources of American religious institutions.
Evangelicals who are not Calvinists have a hard time
understanding the Old Testament, and Camping makes their life easy
by flattening it into «easy - to -
understand» narrative that resembles salvation in a simple sense.