Not exact matches
Last year,
economists at the central bank published a working paper that sought to
understand the overall weakness of Canadian exports
by investigating the foreign sales of dozens of industrial subgroups.
And its not just traditionally «liberal»
economists who
understand that trade imbalances are not caused
by lazy workers.
Some —
by no means all —
economists trying to
understand growing inequality have begun to take seriously a hypothesis that would have been considered irredeemably fuzzy - minded not long ago.
Greider, a senior journalist at the Nation, and Wight, an
economist at the University of Richmond,
understand that capitalism is more than a technical economic system and that it is supported
by more than rational argument.
It is true that the UK could scrap VAT altogether if there was a Brexit but it is highly unlikely because VAT is now well established and
understood and viewed
by economists as a relatively economically efficient tax.
Take Ivory Coast.I find it difficult
understanding why an academician or to be more specific, an accomplished
economist of Dr Bawumia's calibre.Let me quote here a statement made
by Madam Christie Lagarde the IMF director «Mediocre economic growth could become the new reality leaving millions stuck without jobs and increasing the risk to global financial stability» she said this after she has explicitly stated the global economic challenges and how certain structural reforms in Ghana including infrastructure investment as well as trade reforms were going to impact positively on Ghana's economy.
In an attempt to better
understand the issues underlying the debate, the researchers evaluated the model used
by economists — from central banks to the International Monetary Fund — to predict the impacts of government spending.
The easiest way to
understand the objection to fiat money is
by being familiar with how most
economists define money: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money
This financial quiz (actually a psychological experiment) was developed
by the
economists Jeffrey Brown, Jeffrey Kling, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Marian V. Wrobel, who wanted to
understand what factors went into people's retirement decisions.
Ponder that one: The roughly $ 24 billion that the U.S. spends annually on energy subsidies is so complex that its impact can't be
understood by America's top scientists and
economists.
Simply improving messaging in accordance with recommendations of psychologists or following the recommendations of
economists to create economic incentives to engage in less GHG producing behavior will not likely create strong citizen support for climate change policies unless citizens better
understand that the narrative created
by opponents of climate change policies about high levels of scientific uncertainty and unacceptable harm to the economy from the adoption of climate policies is not only false but has been manufactured
by fossil fuel companies and other entities which have economic interests in continuing high levels of fossil fuel consumption.
Vox, a European site, offers «Research - based policy analysis and commentary from leading
economists,» one instance of which is «Neuroeconomic theory: Using neuroscience to
understand the bounds of rationality»
by Isabelle Brocas and Juan D. Carrillo.
An
Economist is a financial scientist, who is responsible for
understanding the economic forces that take place in a region or country and that is valued
by politicians, consumers or industrialists.