Not exact matches
Obviously, explaining the content of said documents is part of the role played
by their legal counsel, but since more than 60 % of
litigants are not represented
by a lawyer, most individuals are asked to read and / or draft legal documents that they can not begin to
understand.
I also
understand your point about the Judge & OC taking a pro se
litigant much more seriously and cutting the nonsense
by the very presence of a court reporter.
By understanding the real extent of settlement failure risk and the economic factors contributing to it,
litigants can then adopt proactive, calibrated trial - avoidance measures using a new legal - analytic process we call Settlement Risk Engineering ™.
The research produced
by Macfarlane and the Research Institute shows that
litigants have enormous difficulty
understanding and navigating the rules of court, the rules of evidence, court processes and the legislation applicable to their cases, and that, unsurprisingly, they find the justice system to be impossibly intimidating, incomprehensible and inaccessible.
«There is no single or simple solution to these problems, but it is clear that the challenges posed
by family
litigants without lawyers needs to be better
understood and addressed,» says the study.
Where a
litigant thereby
understands the applicable Rules of Professional Conduct, and is instructed to recognize and document instances of unprofessional or vexatious conduct
by opposing counsel, there should be clear cost consequences in court against the party shown to be engaging in such conduct, in addition to any reprimands or other disciplinary actions that might be instituted
by the governing professional body.
Much of this «sharp lawyering» against unrepresented
litigants goes unreported and uncommented on, and the reason is elementary: most unrepresented parties lack the legal sophistication and knowledge to
understand that opposing counsel has treated them vexatiously, in a manner that would be in clear breach of the Rules of Professional Conduct if experienced
by fellow Members of the Bar.
I
understand the constitutional, financial and practical reasons for the courts» existence, but most
litigants without counsel are justifiably flummoxed
by the parallel existence of courts with different rules, different forms, different jurisdiction and different fee structures.
My
understanding from colleagues in Quebec is that Quebec judges are generally very flexible and will accommodate
litigants and their counsel
by hearing arguments and rendering a judgment in the language of preference to the parties.
A problem faced
by litigants acting without legal representation is to ensure that documents submitted to the court are concise and clearly set out your arguments in a way that the other party can
understand and respond to.
However, according to Mr. Moskowitz, they see firsthand the effects of the civil legal aid shortage and
understand the disadvantages faced
by pro se
litigants who appear in court unrepresented.
This program brings volunteer lawyers into Chambers, where they act as «amicus curiae» and help the court
understand the issues related and the positions taken
by unrepresented
litigants.
Kalowski stresses that appropriate judicial humour can be characterised
by its accessibility: that
litigants are able to
understand and laugh along with the judge and lawyers.
Being able to say the right thing at the right time is the key to a hearing, and although the McKenzie is able to talk quietly to his
litigant and encourage them to make responses,
by the time the
litigant understands what to say the moment has often passed.
The event brings SRLs together with law students in the hopes of providing future lawyers with a better
understanding of the challenges faced
by self - represented
litigants face, and deepen their
understanding of the potential for legal services innovations for those who can not afford full representation.
In my experience,
litigants in person who are caught up in proceedings on the fast track or multi-track tend to feel, like poor Miss Flite in Bleak House, that they are being tossed around
by processes they can not control and do not
understand.
As a result, law is less readily
understood, and therefore less respected
by the people it is supposed to serve, especially so
by the unconscionably high percentages of unrepresented
litigants in our courts.
As ethicalEsq pointed out last year, the President of one state bar association responded to an excellent report on the need to improve to access, through many types of pro se assistance,
by writing an article asserting that self - represented
litigants (plus judges and court employees) must be educated so they
understand that every
litigant needs a lawyer.