Sentences with phrase «understood by the mind»

It has contributed to an idea of faith as acceptance on authority of what can not be understood by the mind.

only the hearts of a hundred understand by the mind to another through an update.

Not exact matches

These newest results boost the case of the those who argue that immersing yourself in a fictional world populated by layered, complex characters can't help but increase your understanding of how the human mind works and make your fellow humans a little less strange to you.

«Mind your own business, I don't want to be understood by you.

As Sanford Bernstein analyst Sara Senatore wrote in a note today: «While we understand that the timing was determined by Thompson, there is no doubt in our mind that he was under increasing scrutiny by investors and therefore the board.»

By 2012, InteraXon realized the best use of its expertise would be to help people understand and improve their minds through meditation rather than controlling objects.

Fortunately, the type of annuity you're asking about — an immediate annuity — is (by annuity standards at least) the easiest to understand and, to my mind the type with the greatest potential for helping people who want more guaranteed lifetime income than Social Security alone will provide.

By building a picture in everyone's mind, your staff will understand who they need to communicate with.

To finally find and be with a lot of like minded people, who are educated and understand, and then to one by one watch them drop out (not out of ability but of being tired of the system) while the idiots you share a class with go on to graduate and get higher grades.

While the benefits bestowed by technical analysis (TA) can be debated, no trader in their right mind would consider margin or futures trading without a basic understanding of it.

By understanding your emotions and by understanding the nature of a difficult period, an investor can hope to organize and control his mind to think and act rationally.&raquBy understanding your emotions and by understanding the nature of a difficult period, an investor can hope to organize and control his mind to think and act rationally.&raquby understanding the nature of a difficult period, an investor can hope to organize and control his mind to think and act rationally.»

One major reason that the military should not turn cases of military - to - military sex abuse, is that we have a right to be judged by our peers... who understand what the mil life does to the human mind.

The distinction the Oliners made between the appropriation of religious traditions by non-rescuers and rescuers comes to mind here: The rescuers tended to understand the inclusiveness and extensiveness of injunctions to love to extend to all persons and groups.

The MagusNYC: Your mind is so clouded by religious fanaticism that you don't even understand what the problem is with Mormons posthumously baptizing the Jews.

The people there, Hooper maintains, will remain provoked by «the mind - boggling actions of people who've been in the country a decade and still don't understand the cultural and religious sensitivities.»

One might paraphrase the version of the summary of the law as actually understood by many representatives of modern Western theology as «Thou shalt love thy neighbor with all thy heart, soul, mind, and strength.

its not really atheism or religion that I have a problem with, its the hate, control, and fear that goes along with it that I have a problem with, you say that those who are spiritual are into new agey, crystal ball, stuff, see that's what I'm talking about, you assume to know what something is about when you don't understand something you naturally fear it, your self righteous clouds you, don't you get that by being narrow minded in your view towards things, you really act no better than religious fundamentalists, being spiritual is a lot more than just the new agey, think positive all the time that you think it is, its about being aware of who you are?

If you cant control your mind and understand by way of knowledge... then you will wind up like them.

Afterwards, I will review the broader significance of this new understanding of actual occasions and societies for the mind - body problem, paying particular attention to articles published over the years by Whiteheadians on this very topic.

In my mind, understanding economics and being a conservative shoud be mutually exclusive, since the trickle - down supply - side economic schemes devised by the right wing in this country are not founded in capitalist theory.

May I conclude by saying, unless we know «who the God Of the Bible is»... we will have great difficulty to understand the mind of God.

If it is understood in a strongly mentalistic way, as consisting exclusively in what the agent has it in mind to do, then the agent can at least try to avoid formal cooperation by excluding from his plans the evil effects of the action he is cooperating with.

Im not understanding I guess... you object to my statement that the creator of the universe, as humans generally portray «him» — would have be superior intellectually to our greatest minds by a wide margin?

Some — by no means all — economists trying to understand growing inequality have begun to take seriously a hypothesis that would have been considered irredeemably fuzzy - minded not long ago.

Of the range of recent works available in the area of faith and science, Dr Hodgson was keen to recommend as particularly worth reading, Mariano Artigas's book, «The Mind of the Universe: Understanding Science and Religion,» published in 2000 by the Templeton Foundation Press.

Is reality what is or is reality what your critical mind, limited by evidence, can understand?

Paul tells the Philippians, «Be anxious for nothing, but in everything by prayer and supplication, with thanksgiving, let your requests be known to God; and the peace of God, which surpasses understanding, will guard your hearts and minds through Jesus Christ» (Philippians 4:6 - 7).

Say: The Spirit is by command of my Lord, and of knowledge ye have been vouchsafed but little» (Surah XVII, 85), indicates that the identification of the soul is His own concern and that the human mind is too limited to understand such a supernatural reality.

While monasticism in modern times has been deeply influenced by Dom Paul Delatte's rather rigorous interpretation of the Holy Rule (he was Abbot of Solesmes from 1890 to 1921) we find in Hugh Gilbert's firm but gentle hands a rather more humane understanding of the contemporary mind, particularly in his substantial treatment of the concept of obedience (a minefield for any Christian apologist) which stands at the centre of this present work.

Neither choice is easily understood or comprehended by the human mind.

If that is the problem, it will not be solved by a more precise understanding of the forms of reason and authority that have validity for the modern mind.

[7] This does not instil confidence that religious freedom is seriously understood even by a man described as one of the brightest legal minds in the country.

the purpose why God allowed multiple religions to evolve and exist in the distant and even today is because our minds intellectual capacity has increased tremendously after we became civilized about 10,000 years go.Earlier when we were hunter gatherers our priorities was just to find food to survive, Then we became more knowlegible and our concern includes the intelle tual need to understand the meaning and purpose of our existence, so God allowed the founding and establishment of many religions by humans to conform with their intellectual, social and educational development, Since this is not static, it contiually diversify and change to conform with their times of existince, History showed that this is continuesly improving, so the future expects changes towards Panthrotheism in accordance to His will.

Instead of trying to penetrate to the mind and will by physical methods, they seek to understand the individual man through the channel of speech communication which constitutes one's only means of access to what, for convenience, we call the mind.

I shall be discussing primarily the contemporary attempts to reduce life and mind to «matter» as it is understood by a physics and chemistry that may themselves be out of date.

your understanding of the change process is very simplistic, because your mind is not open, you specifically believe already in the traditional doctrines, Dogmas as shown in thousands of years of history evolves, and the need for input variables, meaning the diversity of religious belief is necessay because nature through his will is requiring this to happen, we are being educated by God in the events of history.In the past when there was no humans yet Gods will is directly manifisted in nature, with our coming and education through history, we gradually takes the responsibilty of implementing the will.Your complaint on your perception of abuse is just part of the complex process of educating us through experience.

By the word artistic, what is in mind is the place of understanding and even of self - understanding in the construction of doctrine.

Steve... I think we're floggin» a dead horse here, but for what it's worth, understand that I'm not trying to convince you to think like I do, rather I wd hope that room wd be made for many theological differences.To think discuss and debate theology is well supported by the New Testament and history, and is perfectly within the bounds of what it means to engage our minds with the subject at hand.Theologians and biblical scholars have done this very thing for centuries, revealing a plethora of opinion on the evolving world of biblical studies.Many capable authors have written and debated the common themes as well as the differences between Paul, John, Jesus, the synoptics, etc..

As long as you understand the basic distinction I have briefly laid out above, and recognize that most teachers and writers are going to be a little confused on this topic, you can benefit from what they teach and write by making the little mental adjustment in your mind to whatever they are saying.

We are all mostly doing the best we can to live this life that Jesus has called us to, and our understanding of it grows and changes as we live it and encounter God renewing and transforming our minds by the power of the holy spirit.

Or it could be that not everything can be easily understood by the human mind — so the paradoxes you claim are illogical may not be to you.

With that in mind, I generally discount all of the science and knowledge that has been developed throughout human history as being useful for living in the world we understand, but not truth by any means.

If so, then human minds, created in the image and likeness of God, should be able to understand the world in which we find ourselves; much of the skepticism of modern society needs then to be rethought by Christians.

This does not mean that a person can not have a rational understanding of Christianity or of what the Bible teaches apart from the illumination of his or her mind by the Spirit.

This lack is doubly troubling for the woman writer who is a feminist, because feminism as a movement for transforming patriarchal structures and relations of domination understands change in a quite different way from that of the individualistic biographic tradition presupposed by the question of how one's «mind has changed.»

Why can't we all just mind our own business when it comes to peoples bedrooms and wedding albums, neither side get's to preach in schools, though I understand how you would think of it as the atheist getting his way by just not having you preach your God to his children in a publicly funded school, but he's not sending an atheist spokesman to influence your children, he just doesn't feel it's right to allow the religious spokesman into the schools to influence any children on his tax dollar.

I am convinced that it is by opening its mind, and conforming its practice, to the truth which Buber has perceived and so powerfully set forth that the Church can recover a fresh understanding of its own faith, and regain a real connection with the actual life of our time.

Nor can I see that a single test, least of all a simple reference to the Bible as understood by the recipient of the special revelation, is now or ever will be a sufficient safeguard against the vagaries to which intensely sincere minds are sometimes even more liable than those whose convictions are less fiercely one - sided.

To Derp, I was responding when you asked me the question earlier and even though i know it is impossible to give a spiritual answer to a carnal mind i will still try... The Bible is written by the spirit and you have to be spiritual minded to understand it.

The worldly view always clings fast to the difference between man and man, and naturally it has no understanding of the one thing needful (for to have that is spirituality), and therefore no understanding of the narrowness and meanness of mind which is exemplified in having lost one's self — not by evaporation in the infinite, but by being entirely finitized, by having become, instead of a self, a number, just one man more, one more repetition of this everlasting Einerlei.