When I look at all of this, I see a handful of the 100 large solar system bodies showing some evidence of local warming (Jupiter's spot), some evidence of systemic warming with known causes that are a lot more likely than the Sun heating up (like well -
understood orbital variations), and some evidence that any warming experienced by these bodies is possibly being exaggerated in the reporting.
Not exact matches
Moreover, it offers a better
understanding of the link between
orbital variations and climate change over geologic time scales.
Reality: Whilst there are many areas of interesting research with respect to the glacial - interglacial cycles of the Quaternary, we have a good
understanding of the primary drivers i.e.
orbital variations occurring over cycles of tens of thousands of years.
If some scientists built a countering hypothesis tying in the current stand alone challenges solar and
orbital variations, mistakes in data, etc, I believe it would help to advancing
understanding by encouraging two things.
Descriptions of the
orbital variations have evolved according to the growing
understanding of tectonic and biogeochemical changes.