Not exact matches
«Prevailing party» determinations under Santisas v. Goodin, 17 Cal.4 th 599, 617 (1998)[one
of our Leading
Cases] are especially subject to de novo review given that the
facts frequently are
undisputed and only legal issues are presented for appellate review.
And, it was
undisputed, in each message the firm's GC was asked for advice on «the firm's ethical obligations» — principally, how the firm should respond to a notice from opposing counsel in the employment
case that it intended to call one
of the firm's attorneys as a
fact witness at a forthcoming arbitration hearing.
It is submitted that the
undisputed fact that the claimant had filed a petition under Section 9 which is under Part I in this Court by relying upon the judgment
of Supreme Court in
case of Bhatia International and Venture Global (supra), which clearly indicates
of the intention
of the claimant that Part I
of the Act was not excluded from being applicable to the Parties.
If there are no issues
of fact in your
case, and you are arguing with your spouse over whether an
undisputed set
of facts justifies setting aside your agreement, you may have a summary hearing, where the court reviews pleadings and affidavits and makes an order based upon the evidence in the
case file.