I think Brian has dealt with
your uneducated post very well, there is nothing wrong with being uneducated in these matters, we all have to start somewhere no matter how low on the totem pole we start at.
What a lame and
uneducated post with many statements «missing words and taken out of context».
I made no claims of myself, just stated the fact about the absurd amount of ignorant,
uneducated posts.
Then I stupidly wonder why someone would mock me and
my uneducated posts.
I'm sad to see some of
the uneducated posts on here.
Not exact matches
But the evidence of your
post indicates that you are
uneducated.
Those educated «scientists» that the religious dunces seem to hate (due to all those pesky facts they keep spouting), are the people that gave us, the steam engine that started the industrial revolution; they gave us vaccines to cure disease and electricity so we have light where there was once darkness and they invented the jet engine so that the flat Earthers can fly to see their loved ones on those religious holidays that are so important to them... Not to mention they invented computers and the Internet that allows the right wing Bible thumpers to
post their
uneducated, mindless, factless opinion on this Web Site.
And as we look through this endless list of
post we as christian are labeled as dimwitted,
uneducated and shoving our beliefs down your throats, but yet I read from most of you speak more hate then any christian I have seen
post on here.
BoldGeorge You have a very impressive body of work of ridiculous,
uneducated and unsound
posts, but...
And then we both
post OTHER people who call our experts crazy and
uneducated.
As a story in the Washington
Post put it a few years ago (the editors later apologized), these people are «poor,
uneducated, and easily led.»
Examining the demography and cultural influence of evangelicals, Noll and Kellstedt observe that «there may be a grain of truth to at least the first two - thirds of Michael Weisskopf's assertion in the Washington
Post that the grassroots supporters of the Religious Right are «largely poor,
uneducated, and easy to command.
lol, are you the same ignorant, racist,
uneducated Atheist
posting a thousand times over, too?
This is THE most obnoxious,
uneducated, and just the most hyper ethnocentric
post I've seen in the entire annals of my life's history
Quoting the Washington
Post from several decades ago... «the poor,
uneducated, and easy to command».
Atheists, and I always mean our atheists, the 1 or 2
posting here, r seriously dumb and
uneducated.
I suggest you stop using that in your moniker, as it just shows how
uneducated you are when you
post your bs underneath it.
Remember Resource who made the
post to which you rudely wrote STFU, which is an
uneducated, juvenile and foolish comment on a serious subject, was correct in his analysis.
Sometimes I wonder if some of the least knowledgable
posts here are actually some of the regulars here just playing with us, because nobody can be this
uneducated yet think this highly of their lack of knowledge, can they?
Not only is your
post unnecessary, your viewpoint is
uneducated and your criticism unfounded.
It quite honestly makes you look
uneducated in the matter and prevents me from wanting to read any further blog
posts on this site.
Side note: I don't know if peonies are even this shade of pink, in fact I just took an
uneducated guess in naming this
post.
1) Significantly older than the «average» sugar baby shown on SA marketing methods 2) Significantly heavier in weight, far from the «ideal»
posted on the website marketing materials 3) Mostly
uneducated women / lower class women 4) Most angry / embittered women who feel entitled despite being far outside of the «ideal» that SA markets on its website materials.
In that
post, I also mentioned the Facebook meme I recently saw, the quote that declared, «A child only educated at school is an
uneducated child.»
As a Facebook
post I saw the other day claims, «A child only educated at school is an
uneducated child.»
It is only propped up by the billions of vested interests in all derivatives of the CO2 scheme and now that
post modern science has been unmasked for what it is - a pretext -, the true face of political activism, the social sciences in which you pulled your «denier» term, is showing up, eagerly expecting that after years of brainwashing, fear mongering, propaganda spewed on the masses through main stream media - often linked to vested green interests Thomson Reuters for instance -, that «action» will come thanks to
uneducated zealots, incapable of understanding the science, eagerly parroting arguments of authority and willing to serve their new masters.
It s pretty hard for an
uneducated old farmer to
post into the mass of high level intellectual firepower that Judith has assembled on her blog but here goes;
From my (Very
uneducated) understanding, this means that I am still the copyright holder of the (unique) content that I have
posted, but the forum has the full rights to display the content, which is a right I can not revoke.
Posted in application process, approval, budget, children's life insurance, financial adviser, guaranteed level premium, impaired risk life insurance, Independent agent, insurance, life insurance, life insurance approval, second to die insurance Tagged agents competent and educated, agents
uneducated and incompetent, good outcome right agent, good outcome right company, insurance life insurance, likely worse with another company, Mass Mutual, mistreat on an equal basis, not insurable, second to die life insurance, special needs financial adviser, survivorship life insurance