Tarifa Laddon concentrates her practice on a diverse range of complex business litigation matters, including pharmaceutical and medical device litigation, toxic tort, financial services litigation,
unfair business practice claims, business torts and wage and hour and consumer class action defense.
The next day that firm filed two lawsuits against Diageo, one in federal court, raising a suite of traditional trademark and
unfair business practices claims, but the other in New York State Supreme Court, seeking a permanent injunction under a seldom - used statute available only to charitable organizations, known as Section 135 of the New York General Business Law.
The Los Angeles - based Law Offices of Lisa L. Maki is a nationally recognized litigation firm with Los Angeles employment attorneys focused on offering confidential legal guidance and dedicated representation in plaintiff, complex business and personal injury litigation, employment law, class action, wage and hour, discrimination and harassment, and
unfair business practices claims.
His representative matters have included wrongful termination cases,
unfair business practices claims and FINRA regulatory matters.
Not exact matches
The suit
claims violation of state consumer fraud laws, common law fraud, and
unfair and deceptive
business practices.
Lucas has litigated a variety of matters, including actions for breach of contract, interference torts,
unfair business practices, misappropriation, copyright and trademark infringement, profit participation
claims, idea submission
claims, and media torts including defamation, invasion of privacy, right of publicity and misappropriation of name and likeness in all media, including the Internet.
John concentrates his
practice in
business litigation and has handled a variety of cases, including constitutional and state tort
claims,
unfair trade
practice actions, class certification issues and divorce actions.
Mr. Carter has successfully tried numerous cases and represented companies and individuals in a wide variety of matters, including complex
business disputes involving
claims of breach of contract, fraud,
unfair and deceptive
business practices, and franchise disputes.
To recover damages for a
claim under this statute, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant engaged in a deceptive or
unfair business practice, which was so severe that it «rises to a level of rascality» which would «shock the conscience» of a judge or juror hearing evidence.
The defense and prosecution of
claims for
unfair competition,
unfair business practices and injunctive relief in state and federal courts.
His civil
practice in representing injured persons over the years has included motor vehicle accidents of all types, injuries suffered due to unsafe property conditions at residences and
businesses, medical malpractice, defective consumer products, construction and industrial accidents, injuries at work, sports and recreation related accidents, general negligence, and
claims against insurance companies for bad faith and
unfair claims practices.
Compelling to arbitration — and ultimately obtaining dismissal with prejudice of all
claims — a statewide putative class and representative action brought against a craft store chain in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California that involved meal and rest break, failure to pay wages, inaccurate wage statements,
unfair business practices, and PAGA
claims;
Ms. Field has experience defending financial institutions in complex litigation, consumer class actions and litigation involving fraud
claims, federal consumer credit laws,
unfair business practices and other commercial matters.
Obtained dismissals of suits against financial institutions seeking damages for
claims including negligence, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty,
unfair business practices and elder abuse.
His civil cases included
claims of breach of contract and fiduciary duty,
unfair trade and
business practices, employment discrimination and civil rights violations, securities fraud, negligence, and civil RICO
claims.
In addition to his national trade secrets and noncompete litigation
practice, Russell's
practice concentrates on complex
business litigation, including high - tech matters, copyright infringement matters, trademark disputes,
unfair competition
claims,
business - to -
business matters, and breach of contract
claims.
In his diverse
practice, Jeff represents clients in disputes related to breach of contract,
unfair practices under the Federal Trade Commission Act, employment
claims,
business torts, copyright infringement, trademark infringement, trade secrets misappropriation and other commercial matters.
Robert Barrack dedicates his
practice to complex construction and commercial litigation and appeals, including contractual disputes, professional negligence, surety bond
claims, subrogation
claims, mechanics» liens,
business torts,
unfair trade
practices, bad faith
claims, product liability, and real property disputes, as well as construction transactions, on behalf of
businesses, public entities, educational institutions, and individuals.
Mr. O'Brien's
business litigation experience also includes
claims for conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud,
unfair and deceptive trade
practices, breach of contract, and violations of the Uniform Commercial Code.
He represents
businesses in a range of commercial disputes, such as
claims for breach of contract and
unfair trade
practices.
Mr. Wade helps
businesses in various industries resolve their disputes, such as
claims of breach of contract,
unfair and deceptive trade
practices, fraud, and securities and antitrust violations.
Mr. Moreno has successfully represented clients in
claims involving breach of contract,
unfair business practices, false advertising, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, wrongful foreclosure,
unfair debt collection,
unfair credit reporting, unjust enrichment, misappropriation of trade secrets, quiet title, emotional distress, and receiverships, among others.
She has successfully defended financial firms and banks against a variety of
claims, including breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, negligence,
unfair business practices, and breach of contract.
He has experience representing clients in a wide - range of high - stakes litigation, including class actions, contract
claims,
business torts,
unfair trade
practices, trade secrets, and other
business disputes.
J. Christopher Fox, II (
Business Litigation)-- Fox is a partner whose
practice encompasses a broad range of commercial disputes, including contractual issues arising in the financial services arena, matters relating to restrictive covenants and
unfair competition
claims, and litigation of patent and trademark infringement
claims, as well as defense and prosecution of
claims for misappropriation of trade secrets.
I submit this comment on behalf of the Alliance of
Business Immigration Lawyers, of which I am a member, and in my capacity as a lawyer who has litigated numerous administrative
claims of
unfair immigration - related employment
practices.
Mr. Geiger represents
business clients in all types of disputes, such as product liability (including pharmaceuticals and medical devices), toxic torts, medical and genetics negligence, breach of privacy, other personal injury
claims, class actions, multidistrict litigation, governmental actions, insurance litigation, breaches of contract, allegations of fraud and
unfair trade
practices, commercial warranty disputes and intellectual property controversies.
Ms. Berardi handles complex
business disputes, including
claims for breach of contract and
business torts such as fraud, misrepresentation,
unfair and deceptive trade
practices, and class action litigation.
Ms. Morkan has extensive experience assisting clients with litigation related to
business disputes, from
claims of breach of contract to fraud and
unfair trade
practices allegations.
These matters run the gamut of securities and commodities
claims, including suitability, churning, misrepresentation and sales
practices claims, cases alleging research and investment banking conflicts of interest, margin liquidations, incentive stock option exercises, shareholder derivative class action
claims, customer solicitation
claims,
unfair business practices litigation, and audit and compliance advisory work.
Kristen's litigation experience includes representing individual and corporate clients in cases involving
claims of breach of contract, consumer fraud,
unfair trade
practices, violation of federal and state credit reporting laws, violation of the Fair Debt Collection
Practices Act, professional negligence,
business torts, employment discrimination, wrongful termination, violation of wage and hour law, and violation of non-competition and confidentiality agreements.
Represented national financial institutions and loan servicers in consumer - initiated cases involving allegations of wrongful nonjudicial foreclosure
practices, fraud,
unfair business practices and violations of the Fair Debt Collection
Practices Act, as well as
claims arising out of Retail Installment Sale Contracts.
Tim has represented clients in the federal and state courts and in domestic and international arbitrations on a wide variety of
business issues including disputes arising in connection with the merger, acquisition, sale or purchase of
business entities, contract disputes, securities, trade secret and
unfair trade
practice claims, privacy and cyber tort matters, technology and software disputes, partnership and shareholder disputes, corporate governance, and employment disputes.
At the end I was preparing paperwork to sue them in small
claims court for
unfair and deceptive
business practices.
In terms of patent preemption, the Federal Circuit has determined that in order for any state law tort
claim (e.g., tortious interference,
unfair business practices, etc.) to exist against a patent asserter, the assertion of the patent upon the potentially infringing party must be «objectively baseless» — which essentially means that a reasonable person would not have believed that they would have had a chance of a positive outcome in a lawsuit.
The purchasers alleged that the defendants conspired to mislead and defraud the purchasers regarding the costs of the 1031 transaction, and brought
claims for intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, and
unfair business practices.