WASHINGTON — President Trump's promise to take tough action against China's
unfair economic practices was one of his most popular campaign ideas.
Not exact matches
From his first meeting with Xi, Trump promised that if China would cooperate in tightening
economic sanctions on North Korea, the US would refrain from taking a hard line against what it perceived to be China's
unfair trade
practices.
«The Attorney General, unlike a private litigant... is required only to prove that
unfair or deceptive acts or
practices took place in trade or commerce; she is not required to prove or quantify resulting
economic injury,» the judge wrote.
The U.S. National Security Strategy notes that «China is gaining a strategic foothold in Europe» and calls for joint action with European allies to «contest China's
unfair trade and
economic practices and restrict its acquisition of sensitive technologies.»
While warning against China's expansion in Europe, the strategy suggested that America could cooperate with its allies to «contest China's
unfair trade and
economic practices and restrict its acquisition of sensitive technologies».
Though President Donald Trump's view that China's
economic practices are
unfair is an important point, some of the countries potentially damaged by the proposed steel and aluminum tariffs are U.S. allies in Europe — this situation plays right into the hands of Beijing.
This consent order concerns violations by Air X Aviation, Inc., (Air X Aviation) of 49 U.S.C. § 41101, the Department's aviation
economic licensing requirements, and 14 CFR 399.80, which prohibits certain
practices by ticket agents that constitute
unfair and deceptive
practices and
unfair methods of competition.
This consent order concerns unauthorized interstate air service provided by Scott Air LLC d / b / a Island Air Express (Scott), a company without
economic authority from the Department, that violated 49 U.S.C. § 41101 and constituted an
unfair and deceptive
practice prohibited by 49 U.S.C. § 41712.
Some credit repair organizations, however, advertise and engage in
unfair business
practices which result in financial hardship for consumers, particularly those of limited
economic means or are uneducated.
Not only does this have the
unfair feel to it, the
practice creates a barrier to job seekers that have been unemployed during the
economic downturn.
Stevenson filed a lawsuit against Insignia, alleging intentional interference with prospective
economic advantage and also a violation of the state's
unfair business
practices act.