Sentences with phrase «unfounded assertions»

As far as I can see, you are simply making unfounded assertions in the hopes somebody will be fooled.

However, unfounded assertions seem to be your stock and trade.

Did you ever consider what the phrase unfounded assertions means?.

I was depicted as «less than honest about», «simply making unfounded assertions», «had any credibility in criticizing climate science».

«Instead of pointing to and justifying an honest disagreement about law or jurisprudence, Senator Reid makes unfounded assertions of incompetence — and backs them up with false statements (about Hillside) and mischaracterizations (that the «whole point» of his preferring Scalia to Thomas is that Scalia's opinions are «very logical» and Thomas» aren't).

Perhaps the following book can help you cope with the problem of repeating unfounded assertions:

It is only fair if you can provide for me where you get the origin, reason, purpose, and meaning for life then we have grounds for both of us to cover otherwise our discussion can only be one - sided based on unfounded assertions, accusations, and conclusions.

Occasionally, I will illuminate unfounded assertions or falsehoods.»

Shedding light on a subject by questioning unfounded assertions through highlighting the verbiage that Christians use to assert their faith to other people is Tyne equivalent of hating god?

The entity «fred» makes similar unfounded assertions.

If you are able to find a solution to avoiding unfounded assertions, then you should share this solution with the entity «fred».

Now that the NAACP has ratified its call for a charter moratorium, charter proponents are continuing the barrage of invective and unfounded assertions rather than taking stock of their opposition's arguments.

Steven Jay Gould borrowed the term «just so stories» from Rudyard Kipling to describe the presentation of entirely unfounded assertions as scientific fact.

Using my Idiomatic Expression Equivalency module (IEE), the expression that best matches the degree to which your repeated unfounded assertions may represent truths is: «EPIC FAIL».

Yep, I see, «less than honest about», «simply making unfounded assertions», «had any credibility in criticizing climate science»... Nice lineup of solid scientific arguments.

Perhaps some study in history will help you understand what lead to these unfounded assertions.

Using my Idiomatic Expression Equivalency module (IEE), the expression that best matches the degree to which your repeated unfounded assertions may represent truths is: «CHRONIC TOTAL FAIL».

Using my Idiomatic Expression Equivalency module (IEE), the expression that best matches the degree to which your unfounded assertions may represent truths is: «EPIC FAIL».

Using my Idiomatic Expression Equivalency module (IEE), the expression that best matches the degree to which your unfounded assertions may represent truths is: «TOTAL FAIL».

(I should however warn you, «Jeff» that you are also close to unofficial limit of unfounded assertions that a poster can make before they are deemed a «dweeb».)

Using my Idiomatic Expression Equivalency module (IEE), the expression that best matches the degree to which your unfounded assertion may represent a truth is: «TOTAL FAIL».

Your unfounded assertion value remains at 0, «Bob» (Idiomatic Expression Equivalency module (IEE) value = «TOTAL FAIL»).

Or was it that you were just attacking someone with an unfounded assertion because she thinks differently than you?

They make unfounded assertions and are just plain mean at times.

273 nigelj Killians claims are all just such exaggeration and unfounded assertion.

IMO Killians claims are all just such exaggeration and unfounded assertion.

I'm not saying that is the threshold, only contesting your unfounded assertion that the Scotese summary implies there are no tipping points.

So far you have unfounded assertions.

an Internet argument tactic involving a reprinting of an article or blog post, interlarded with rebuttals and refutations, often intended to show the original is a sandpile of flawed facts, unfounded assertions, and logical fallacies.

These grey areas, in particular, must be attacked so that we can get the complacent experts who explain things from their own uncertainty to either back up their claims with evidence or discovery, or retract / rephrase their unfounded assertions and find a more suitable occupation.