Sentences with phrase «unhappy players»

In these situations, the club had always two options: To hold the unhappy players against their wishes and continue to pay their wages for job not done and then lose them again for nothing at the end of their contracts or grant these players their wishes sooner and get some immediate cash in the process.

Unhappy players, a toxic atmosphere and accusations of treachery marred the end of Jose Mourinho's time at Stamford Bridge as fans saw the man they saw as the club's talisman leave the club in ignominy.

We can not keep unhappy players.

A section of the media were sure that the team was in turmoil with unhappy players and infighting.

You can't keep a player benched just in case you need them, that way lays unhappy players and potential squad disruption.

Look at number of unhappy players.

Conte says he does not intend to keep unhappy players and admits he understands that the likes of Luiz and Batshuayi might want to play more often to ensure they're in contention to play for their countries at this summer's World Cup.

But being the business man he is, he failed to say how we kept unhappy players in our squad and didn't strengthen the areas which lacked improvement, exampled by the horrorshow against Liverpool and Stoke.

We are in for a long season with a house of unhappy players.

Problems with unhappy players?

The first being the loss of # 150 mil from our squad next year and secondly it was obvious that keeping unhappy players would cause disharmony within the group this year.

There was much frustration from the Arsenal fans who witnessed our capitulation, and there were lots of unhappy players trooping off the pitch as well with the boos echoing in their ears.

Mourinho's biggest task is to restore that culture, and the board has made it clear that they'll sell any player who's not up to scratch and back the manager in any dispute with unhappy players.

Even Wenger is bright enough to know that keeping unhappy players is a recipe for disaster and that is what we have seen.

We seen at Chelsea that unhappy players do not perform their best and once they are happy they can turn things around.

Because we don't need to see our lovely club going down any more due such unhappy players.

It's a WC year not the best time to switch teams and city have loads of talent on their hands they are gonna have a bunch of unhappy players or happy mercenaries whichever way you want to look at it.

You don't want deeply unhappy players in your squad.

More likely we will get an unhappy player who will be more focused on his next contract and club come January and who will save himself for the world cup.

Now we have an unhappy player in sanchez on our hands, missed out on a quality player Lemar, Din't go after a decent winger or Midfielder, Sold our RWB Ox without finding any replacement, sold our best defender in Gabriel, Sold left back for peanuts.

If Sanchez wants to leave, then sell him to PSG for # 50m, there's no point keeping an unhappy player at the club.

But do all want unhappy player who will attract unwanted media attention.

So, Wenger or the management should lie to keep unhappy player?

Surely Southampton can't keep an unhappy player for a second season in a row, so it must be certain that he will be moving on very soon.

Yo cant force / keep unhappy player against his wish also remember he will be 30 yrs soon we messed up this one during summer at 60mln could have gone to Arsenal bank Gazidis had been blaming wenger indirectly «poor infrastrucure» where Mr wenger wants to handle everything by himself.

It was easy to predict that keeping a player against his will gets an unhappy player and an unhappy dressing room and that is what we have seen.

a good unhappy player isnt always the best.

i think they go gregory or sherff... what gm wants to take a guy one pick ahead of a destination he's all ready publicly said he wants to play for, would you want a unhappy player on your team right off the bat?

The Villains remain insistent that they won't do any business unless Benteke's # 32.5 millon release clause is met, but they could face the prospect of an unhappy player at the club next season should the Reds refuse to match the valuation.

Selling Alexis makes business and footballing sense, he will leave for free in the next season to man city or even Chelsea, he priced himself out of Bayern, because he wants to play for pep, he's not bigger than arsenal, we can't have an unhappy player around our new signings..

Only a naive Manager will keep an unhappy player and loose him for free in the summer.

Clearly had the season of his life last term but if Sir Alex Ferguson is not going to use him as first choice then having an unhappy player in the dressing room will serve no useful purpose.

You suggested that you would have preferred to have kept an unhappy player at the club and let him leave for free!!?

It would be moronic to pay that kind of money for any unhappy player in their last year of their contract.

Keeping an unhappy player, and not just any player but your star player will disrupt our dressing room.

U don't keep an unhappy player, and it is not only man city competing with arsenal.

Rumors of AFC rejecting a loan move for Mustafi and wanting a transfer would be stupid unless AFC are looking to buy a CB in the last moments, hoping to get a deal on a unhappy player... I know it is hope and unlikely

As a result, the Citizens may be willing to let the Ivorian forward leave before the window closes, rather than keep an unhappy player on the books.

There are too many negative aspects around keeping an unhappy player at the club.

I'm not too bothered if Sanchez leaves, there's no point in keeping an unhappy player at the club.

Jose Mourinho may want to retain the defender's services rather than be forced into finding another replacement, but it's difficult to keep hold of an unhappy player once he has made his mind up.

Also reports from France say Monaco will be willing at consider a deal for Lemar rather than keep an unhappy player for the season, could we see 2 last min deals?

Even someone with as big an ego as Mou will know that another # 5M in wages to keep an unhappy player on the bench and the loss of a # 10 - 12M transfer fee is not worth it.

It's better to cut your losses rather than keeping an unhappy player who probably won't see a single minute of playing time.

IMO we could be looking close to # 100 million for the 2 players and if AFC only have around # 70 - 80 million... I also think AFC do not care if the signings happen on the last day of the transfer window if it means saving a few # # # by getting a cut down price on a unhappy player.

we shouldn't keep an unhappy player, I want a team playing with love and passion this coming season... and no one is bigger than Arsenal

It is not worth it to Keep an unhappy player, who has deeply divided the team so much badly.

And we are left with an unhappy player who doesn't put in a shift.

I can't see Wenger keeping hold of an unhappy player, especially if the rumours of Sanchez having words with wenger, stating that he wants out and with Juventus planning on putting in an improved bid for the player.

Liverpool will be forced to sell an unhappy player to mighty gunners who i believe may finish in Top 3.