Sentences with phrase «unified theories»

Textures are a more complicated type of defect that can arise in some unified theories of particle physics — a type of higher dimensional topological knot that unwinds at the speed of light.

That would be a blow not just to supersymmetry but also to even more ambitious unified theories of physics that presume it, which include string theory and other approaches [see «Loops, Trees and the Search for New Physics,» by Zvi Bern, Lance J. Dixon and David A. Kosower].

It is always with great interest that I read your articles on particle physics, the cosmos, grand unified theories and...

Correlation supersedes causation, and science can advance even without coherent models, unified theories, or really any mechanistic explanation at all.

The first was that he had insufficient knowledge about nuclear forces, which are essential ingredients of modern unified theories.

It is indeed a vindication of sorts for Einstein because much of what today's string theorists do in practice is play with unified theories of the kinds that Einstein and his few colleagues invented.

For it turns out that unified theories are a dime a dozen.

It may be that there are dozens of unified theories, only one of which is correct, but scientists may never have the means to determine which.

At the Guggenheim Museum, for instance, Karole Armitage is doing a dance piece based on unified theories and quantum gravity, with an onstage discussion that pulls out the science between her and a physicist.

Grand unified theories — which combine the strong, weak, and electromagnetic forces into a single mathematical structure — posit symmetries that involve rotations in abstract spaces of five or more complex dimensions.

Nope, argues University of San Diego philosopher professor Nick Riggle in his new book On Being Awesome: A Unified Theory of How Not to Suck.

As I write my new book, The Unified Theory of Profitability, I am reflecting on a lot of my client work to be able to share what has been most successful.

This dream, called the Grand Unified Theory, would give us a simpler, more elegant understanding of the universe, showing that all the interactions we see are different manifestations of one unified force.

I know that using flying books, misbehaving watches, and binary dust patterns are much more dramatic means of communication, but explaining a completely new unified theory of gravitational force would be much easier with equations and diagrams than with a seemingly random set of binary data.

The US Dollar is the «grand unifying theory asset» for nearly any and all «profile» global macro or thematic equities trades in the marketplace right now, as it represents investors being long this «new» version of «economic growth.»

Even knowledge of the «hard» sciences advances over time; a unified theory of the investment world is similarly beyond our grasp — as is a full understanding of any one strategy, no matter the current pile of historical evidence.the research puzzle For more thoughts on the topic, see this posting on «decaying beliefs.»

I have a suspicion that there is a unifying theory that would be the key to understanding it all.

= > I find it interesting that Hawking in rejecting a personal God has spent the last 15 years in search of a unifying theory.

While this fact is perhaps too often taken for granted, Davies makes no attempt to hide his certainty that all ballyhooed attempts to find a Grand Unified Theory of Everything are to some extent self - defeating precisely because of the quite inexplicable, indeed mysterious, effectiveness of mathematics in explaining events in the physical world.

In # 4, you say that there is an unseen wholeness to everything: for years, physicists have been searching for what they call the «unified theory,» one theory that will explain the physical properties of the universe and not break down at the very small or very large levels.

Einstein truly did seek a unified theory yet never attained it.

I propose that the concept of relational power is an important contribution because (as Loomer points out) it blends the best of these traditional roles into a unified theory of power in which agents are sensitive and nurturing as well as effective.

I said «some grand unified theory» not really realising that it could cause confusion.

Science is always willing to admit it's wrong about something — that's why they look for a unified theory, it's a search for what is true.

The grand unified theory (GUT) isn't actually relevant with GR, as the GUT is what we have to explain E&M, strong and weak forces.

Consider even Hawkings continues to search for a single unified theory... why?

When I use the word Pagan (capital - P), I'm using it to signify one specific thing: an ambiguous but somewhat unified theory of Western Religious thought.

The scientists can not find a unified theory no matter how hard they try for the last 500 years — there is still mystery.

But it is so open to be all - inclusive, all - consuming, like a unifying theory that applies to everyone from atheist to believer in any religious or spiritual tradition, that most wouldn't accept me as a part of their club.

One is that science hasn't really been looking for a unified theory for 500 years.

«Even if there is only one possible unified theory, it is just a set of rules and equations.

= > Is Stephen Hawkings arrogant when he knows that one day science will find a unified theory = > I would think arrogance is in the manner of presentation of knowledge not the belief in Christ that allows me to know that all things work to the good of those who believe.

To the extent that these two goals are mutually inclusive, we see a unified theory of education in Whitehead.

Does science have the grand unified theory of everything yet?

Why the hell shouldn't NP come up with a unifying theory?

Beyond that, I am not sure why we need a new unifying theory.

In somewhat similar vein Leon Lederman, director of the Fermi Laboratory near Chicago, proclaimed that the objective of physics was to find «a unified theory of everything» so simple it could be written as a single formula that you can wear on your T - shirt (Davies 1989, p. 13).

When NP says «I think the z - theory is a unifying theory.

In metaphysics the Grand Unified Theory has been achieved many times over (from Hebraic monotheism to Aristotle's prime mover), but the issue is: «what are the features and characteristics of the thing that is in the strictest sense?»

Picking his way expertly through three centuries of scientific history, from Newton on gravity (the force that causes apples to fall and planets to stay in orbit is the same), through electricity and magnetism (aspects of a single reality), to the present search for a Grand Unified Theory, he argued that the coherence of the physical universe progressively uncovered by science points to a «unity principle» at its heart.

In a sense, Christ provides the grand unifying theory long sought by physicists, since creation unfolds within the Word's dynamic and personal assumption of human nature, «the microcosmos».

Thus, a teaching regarding the primacy of Christ must not limit itself to a hypothetical stance that, despite its importance, runs the risk of reducing Christ to a final cause or to a unifying theory.

Is there a unifying theory that we can develop and embrace that will satisfy the contemporary intellect of truth - seekers?

In order to address the problem of integration, we need to reassess the capacity of theology to unify theory and practice, critical studies and pastoral concerns.

Where's the unifying theory, the justification for such an approach, the criteria for good exegesis?

My z - theory, which endeavors to articulate a more unified theory of spirituality, is especially repugnant to many.

Instead, the search for a unifying theory (what many physicists might describe as a search for «truth») dominates the discipline's most cutting - edge work.

He explains how the orthodox view amongst theoretical physicists is that there is, «out there,» a perfect, unified law — it is the very goal of the sort of «grand unified theory» that many physicists are aiming at.

It's perhaps a bit much to ask for thematic coherence of a man's diary, but Eduardo Cadava, co-translating the text into its first English rendering with Liana Theodoratou, posits a unifying theory in his introduction: The key to understanding Nadar's writing lies not so much in the «Photographer» of the title as in the «When.»

idiotusmaximus NO, Hawking has said someday a unified theory will demonstrate no god needed.