Not exact matches
The push for
uniform statewide (and now multi-state)
academic standards that, it is claimed, will cause every child to become «proficient» (in NCLB lingo) or «college and career ready» (in today's preferred terminology).
Nebraska's enactment last week of a new plan of statewide
academic standards and assessments leaves Iowa as the nation's lone holdout in the movement to embrace at least some variety of
uniform state testing.
This for a place that promised longer days (an hour more than the regular public schools), an extra 25 days of school per
academic year, tough discipline,
uniforms, and rigorous
academic standards.
The district initiative also provides the capacity to create
uniform standards for
academic rigor, certification, and professional development.
demonstrate competence in all the
academic subjects in which you teach based on a high, objective,
uniform state
standard of evaluation.
It is true that a system of
uniform academic expectations and assessments would rectify some shortcomings of state - specific
standards (chiefly the dizzying discrepancies among them, and the resulting confusion regarding which schools and students are failing or succeeding).
Another irony is that the best charters themselves copy from the classic Catholic - school model —
uniforms, firm discipline, high
academic standards and expectations, plus a schoolwide ethic grounded in clear values.
Although standardized tests can provide parents with useful information about their child's
academic performance, using them to impose
uniform standards that so narrowly define «quality» creates perverse incentives that narrow the curriculum, stifle innovation, and can drive away quality schools from participating in the choice program.
Eventually the idea of creating
uniform K - 12
academic standards within a state took hold, although each state in the U.S. developed and adopted its own set of
standards for its schools and students.
State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson and the State Board of Education are using multiple cues to send a
uniform message: Parents shouldn't compare the new results with scores on past state standardized tests; this year's English language arts and math tests are, they say, more difficult, and are based on a different set of
academic standards.
Instead,
academic creativity and autonomy have been replaced by dull testing of
uniform standards that force teachers to tailor lessons towards that end.
The Code of Virginia requires that (1) principal evaluations be consistent with the performance objectives (
standards) set forth in the Board's Guidelines for
Uniform Performance
Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers, Administrators, and Superintendents and (2) school boards» procedures for evaluating principals address student
academic progress.
The Code of Virginia requires that (1) superintendent evaluations be consistent with the performance objectives (
standards) set forth in the Board's Guidelines for
Uniform Performance
Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers, Administrators, and Superintendents and (2) school boards» procedures for evaluating principals address student
academic progress.
The Board's Guidelines for
Uniform Performance
Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Principals calls for each principal to receive a summative evaluation rating and that the rating be determined by weighting the first six
standards equally at 10 percent each, and that the seventh
standard, student
academic progress, account for 40 percent of the summative evaluation.
Chief among them: using data to track students and improve their achievement; spreading
uniform, rigorous
academic standards across states; improving teacher quality; and turning around the worst - performing schools.
demonstrates competence in all the
academic subjects in which the teacher teaches based on a high objective
uniform state
standard of evaluation that: