We've talked at Slaw about the need for a free online Canadian
uniform citation guide — indeed, even offered the services of our members to the McGill Guide folks, who declined our help.
Mirando suggests that the Canadian legal community develop a free
uniform citation guide.
Not exact matches
I stumbled across part of the Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition website, where I found a good swathe of the 6th edition of the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation available online in PDF.
The 7th edition of the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation is over a year old already.
A Review of the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation.
of the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation and I must say that in my experience with the 7th ed., it is far closer to the 7th circle of hell than the 7th sphere of heaven.
Joanne Colledge and Lea Lapointe wrote an engaging article titled «How Does a «
Uniform»
Citation Guide Fail to Be
Uniform?
The McGill is the Canadian
Guide to Uniform Legal Citation, but lately I have been wondering if there might be room for another guide to legal citation in Ca
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation, but lately I have been wondering if there might be room for another guide to legal citation in
Citation, but lately I have been wondering if there might be room for another
guide to legal citation in Ca
guide to legal
citation in
citation in Canada?
Sometime later this spring, there will be an announcement of yet another new edition of the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation (the McGill
Guide).
My own preferred solution would be for interested parties to maintain a standard
citation guide online in a wiki format, where issues in
uniform citation can be openly and intensively discussed.
The eighth edition of the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation («McGill
Guide») was published in May.
If you would like to publish with the MJDR please follow the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation, used by all major Canadian legal journals and accessible online.
If you would like to publish with us, please ensure to follow the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation — used by all major Canadian legal journals and accessible online.
With the new fall term just beginning, and thousands of first - year law students across the country entering upon legal studies; and with the student editors of the McGill Law Journal preparing yet another new edition of the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation (incredibly, the 8th since its first appearance in 1986), I thought it an... [more]
Early in my career, when I was a freshly hatched legal editor, I pored over the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation (the McGill
Guide).
Answer — When it appears in the McGill Law Journal's Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation (the «McGill
Guide»)
Citations in predominantly legal works generally follow one of two
guides: (1) The Bluebook: A
Uniform System of
Citation...; or (2) the ALWD
Citation Manual: A Professional System of
Citation....
The Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation was created by the editors of the McGill Law Journal and published by Carswell Thomson.
Ted Tjaden (August 20), Mark Lewis (September 3), and Shaunna Mireau (September 9 and September 14) have already posted on the McGill Law Journal's Canadian
guide to
uniform legal
citation, 7th ed.
Appendix A and Appendix F of the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation (aka McGill
Guide), should do the trick.
With the new fall term just beginning, and thousands of first - year law students across the country entering upon legal studies; and with the student editors of the McGill Law Journal preparing yet another new edition of the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation (incredibly, the 8th since its first appearance in 1986), I thought it an opportune moment to add my thoughts on the practice of legal citation and how we — and specifically the editors of the McGill Guide — would do well to reconsider both the ends and the means of legal citation as currently pr
Citation (incredibly, the 8th since its first appearance in 1986), I thought it an opportune moment to add my thoughts on the practice of legal
citation and how we — and specifically the editors of the McGill Guide — would do well to reconsider both the ends and the means of legal citation as currently pr
citation and how we — and specifically the editors of the McGill
Guide — would do well to reconsider both the ends and the means of legal
citation as currently pr
citation as currently practised.
The review does not mention that there is only a draft version of a
citation style for the Blue Book, and nothing in the works to make Zotero work with our own inimitable Canadian Guide to Uniform Legal C
citation style for the Blue Book, and nothing in the works to make Zotero work with our own inimitable Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
CitationCitation.
Colleague Katharine Thompson has provided me a list of some of the changes she noticed in the new, just received 7th edition of the McGill
Guide, known more formally as the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation, edited by editors of the McGill Law Journal and published by Carswell.
Clarification on these issues is welcome, and perhaps it will come when the next edition of the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation is published.
Here in Alberta, on November 12, 2013 there was a Notice to the Profession from the Court of Queen's Bench adopting the 7th edition of the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation (Toronto: Carswell, 2010).
Hosted on WestlawNext Canada, the online versions of Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation, 8th Edition makes it accessible anytime, anywhere.
Now in its 8th edition, the
Guide provides a straightforward,
uniform approach to
citation of government documents, case law, legislation, periodicals, monographs and other secondary materials across all jurisdictions.
In addition, although the new 6th edition of the «McGill
Guide» (the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation) does not appear to discuss «blogs» specifically, one could likely adapt their rules and examples on citing to electronic sources under Rule 6.19.
The McGill Law Journal recently completed the latest (6th) edition of its famous Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation.
Much has been written on SLAW about the fairly recent 7th edition of the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation (known as the McGill
Guide, red in colour, and published by Carswell), including a lengthy 21 September 2010 post by John Davis that includes links to prior posts.
Last Summer, the 7th edition of the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation (the «McGill
Guide») introduced this «General Rule» at p. E-3:
Personally, I have stopped short of keeping the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation and the Chicago Manual of Style on my night - table.
Canadian courts, legal periodicals, law faculties and lawyers rely on the
Guide to maintain a
uniform system of legal
citation.
Podcasts are like any other internet site according to the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation, 7th edition.
How do we begin work on a
citation guide that is
uniform, relevant, professional and freely available?
The 7th edition of the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation (AKA The McGill
Guide) will soon be coming out.
Let it be a
guide that is truly
uniform, a standard for legal
citation practice in publishing, in the courts, in practice and in the academy.
It is increasingly unacceptable as a «
uniform»
guide — witness the alternative
citation guide recently published by the Courts of Saskatchewan.
However, section 2.1.6 of the Canadian
Guide to
Uniform Legal
Citation indicates that the CCSM citation is not sufficient on its own, though it may be included as an additional citation (e.g., The Arbitration Act, SM 1997, c 4, CCSM c A12
Citation indicates that the CCSM
citation is not sufficient on its own, though it may be included as an additional citation (e.g., The Arbitration Act, SM 1997, c 4, CCSM c A12
citation is not sufficient on its own, though it may be included as an additional
citation (e.g., The Arbitration Act, SM 1997, c 4, CCSM c A12
citation (e.g., The Arbitration Act, SM 1997, c 4, CCSM c A120, s 1).