Not exact matches
Holding that the state's
school finance
system was rationally related to the constitution's requirement to provide «a thorough and
uniform»
system of public schools, the majority rejected the trial court's decision in its entirety.
Seizing also on the requirement
of uniformity, the court asserted that private
schools are not
uniform when compared with each other or with the
public system.
The 22,395 - student Federal Way district, located between Seattle and Tacoma, declared in its lawsuit — filed Nov. 21 in King County Superior Court — that the formula violates the state constitutional requirement that the state create a «general and
uniform»
system of public schools.
In two separate lawsuits, opponents
of educational choice alleged that Nevada's ESA violated the state constitution's mandate that the state provide a «
uniform system of common
schools» (Article 11, Section 2), its prohibition against using
public funds for sectarian purposes (Article 11, Section 6), and a clause requiring the state to appropriate funds to operate the district
schools before any other appropriation is enacted for the biennium (Article 11, Section 10).
In Florida they won a victory early in 2006 when that state's supreme court struck down a voucher program on the grounds that the constitutional command
of a «
uniform...
system of free
public schools» prohibited any alternative.
These education experts have forsaken the reform consensus; they now argue instead for an improved version
of the «one best
system»
of American
public schools — which harks back to the Horace Mann - era conviction that a single,
uniform public - education
system, run by professional educators, is the surest path to both literacy and civic unity.
Unfortunately, in January
of 2006, the Florida Supreme Court ruled the program unconstitutional primarily on the grounds that it created competition with the
public school system and because the private
schools were not «
uniform» with our
public schools, which is the whole point
of school choice.
The Harford County
Public School System maintains a reasonably uniform system of education for its youth, providing educational experiences and opportunities designed to meet unique student
System maintains a reasonably
uniform system of education for its youth, providing educational experiences and opportunities designed to meet unique student
system of education for its youth, providing educational experiences and opportunities designed to meet unique student needs.
Fund Education Now grades legislators on their efforts to provide and fund «a
uniform, efficient, safe, secure, and high quality
system of free
public schools that allows students to obtain a high quality education» as outlined in Article IX, section 1
of the Florida Constitution.
A 2012 state law prompted the overhaul
of the state's existing quality rating
system and required a
uniform rating
system for all early childhood programs that receive any
public funding, including private providers, federally funded Head Start centers and pre-K classrooms in
public and private
schools.
In a suit challenging the state's
school finance
system, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that its education provision requiring
uniform public schools (Article X, Section 3) related to the character
of instruction offered in the
public schools, and not the size, boundaries or composition
of the
school districts.
So she teamed up with other education advocates to sue the state, arguing that Florida is violating its Constitutional obligation to provide «a
uniform, efficient, safe, secure, and high quality
system of free
public schools.»
Judge Hobgood granted his injunction to temporarily halt the
school voucher program on the basis
of voucher challengers» first claim for relief: that the state constitution requires that state funds be used exclusively for establishing and maintaining a
uniform system of free
public schools.
Several provisions in the Colorado Constitution prevent the state and
school districts from raising and expending funds necessary to establish and maintain a «thorough and
uniform»
system of free
public schools.
Having invalidated the programs on these grounds, the court declined to address whether the programs also violate the Arizona Constitution's requirement for the «establishment and maintenance
of a general and
uniform public school system.»
Several provisions in the Colorado Constitution prevent the State and
school districts from raising and expending funds necessary to establish and maintain a thorough and
uniform system of free
public schools.
Last month, Denver District Judge Sheila Rappaport ruled in the case
of Lobato vs. State
of Colorado that Colorado's current
public school finance
system fails to meet state constitutional requirements to maintain a thorough and
uniform public school system.
Instead, it is by complying with our state constitution and restoring a
uniform system of fully funded
public schools so that every student has an opportunity to receive a quality education including a fully qualified teacher and low class sizes so that struggling students can get the help they need to succeed in
school and succeed in life.
We conclude that as long as the Legislature maintains a
uniform public school system, open and available to all students, the constitutional mandate
of Section 2 is satisfied, and the Legislature may encourage other suitable educational measures under Section 1.
It said, «[t] he Meredith court distinguished the Bush decision because the Indiana Constitution contained no «adequate provision» clause and no restriction on the mandate to provide a free
public school system, and instead contained two distinct duties — «to encourage... moral, intellectual, scientific, and agricultural improvement,» and «to provide... for a general and
uniform system of Common
Schools.
1) appropriates to private
schools grades K - 12, by use
of funds which apparently have gone to the university
system budget but which should be used exclusively for establishing and maintaining the
uniform system of free
public schools;
During the Great Depression the state assumed the major role for funding
schools: «provided for the operation
of a
uniform system of schools in the whole State for a term
of eight months... and relieved the county board
of education
of the responsibility for operating and maintaining the
public schools of the county,» according to the 1933
School Machinery Act.
The Florida
public -
school establishment is suing to repeal the Sunshine State's 13 - year - old
school - choice tax credit and its new education savings accounts under the state's Blaine Amendment and its «uniformity clause,» which mandates that «Adequate provision shall be made by law for a
uniform, efficient, safe, secure, and high quality
system of free
public schools...» The Florida Supreme Court previously struck down the state's voucher program under this provision in Bush v. Holmes (2006), on the grounds that the vouchers «divert [ed]
public dollars» from «the sole means set out in the Constitution for the state to provide for the education
of Florida's children.»
The General Assembly shall provide by taxation and otherwise for a general and
uniform system of free
public schools, which shall be maintained at least nine months in every year, and wherein equal opportunities shall be provided for all students.
The state's constitution does have a «uniformity clause,» however, requiring that the state provide a general and
uniform system of free
public schools.
After protracted court proceedings, the Florida Supreme Court ruled in 2006 that the Florida Opportunity Scholarship Program, a universal voucher program, violated Article IX, section 1
of the Florida Constitution: «Adequate provision shall be made by law for a
uniform, safe, secure and high - quality
system of free
public schools.
The General Assembly shall provide by taxation and otherwise for a general and
uniform system of free
public schools, which shall be maintained at least nine months in every year, and wherein equal opportunities shall be provided for all students.