Undoubtedly, Western interests are at stake in Syria and the region more widely, but we are not going to advance or protect them by
unilateral military action — not only because such action would be in violation of international law but also because it can not achieve desirable outcomes.
«However,
unilateral military action by the U.S. in a Middle East conflict causes grave concern, given the lack of any Authorization for Use of Military Force from Congress and the absence of any long - term plan or strategy to address any consequences from such unilateral action.»
Two factors, they believe, «demand the urgent attention of parliamentarians»: the US»
unilateral military action, and the lack of a coordinated military response.
And finally, I want to briefly address the use of
unilateral military action and intervention rather than diplomacy and negotiation to resolve disputes and change governments.
Jacksonians take a populist view of US foreign policy; they support
unilateral military action to pursue American enemies and defend American honour, but are suspicious about global meliorative measures like overseas aid and global governance structures.
The U.S. does not have intrinsic enmity toward Iraq and has no justification for
unilateral military action.
Unilateral military action against North Korea would likely differ from the list of U.S. missile strikes above.
Not exact matches
When such a request is made, Congress should make a deliberate decision to comply, so that
military action is not a
unilateral decision of the executive branch.
Pope Francis has given his support to some sort of
military action in Iraq but not
unilateral bombing by America.
Pope Francis has given his support to some sort of
military action in Iraq but not
unilateral bombing... More