Last spring, after Albany's long season of scandals, plus a battering from the state teachers
union over evaluations and Common Core, the governor was on the defensive, his poll numbers falling.
This year's state exams, which third through eighth graders will begin taking this week, immediately follow a bitter battle between Cuomo and teachers»
unions over evaluations as well as tenure, merit pay and turnaround strategies for chronically underperforming schools.
Not exact matches
Further proof of my assertion not long ago that education is developing into a serious sticking point between Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver came in the form of a statement from the governor that blames «Assembly - led» legislation passed in 2010 for the current fight between the teachers
unions and school districts
over the creation of teacher
evaluation systems.
First, the state Education Department and the teachers
unions must resolve a lawsuit
over the
evaluations or Cuomo will insert his own plan into the 30 - day amendments (taking advantage of the broad powers the governor has
over the budget in New York).
It's a reversal from only three years ago, when Gov. Andrew Cuomo muscled the
evaluation law through the Legislature
over the objections of the state's politically powerful teachers
unions.
King recently expressed extreme frustration with the teachers
union and school administrators in several large cities downstate and upstate,
over what he said was a failure to come up with a teacher
evaluation plan by a December 31 deadline, to meet requirements for the federal Race to the Top grant awards.
Unfortunately, the governor's laudable efforts will be squandered if he gets drawn into a narrow fight with the
unions over details, like points and weighting percentages in teacher
evaluations.
The teacher's
union is suing the Education Department
over the teacher
evaluation process, and won a partial victory in state court last summer.
The governor is also asking for the state's largest teachers
union and the state education department to drop a lawsuit
over the teacher
evaluation has that has further delayed things.
The opt - out effort this year has united different political strains: Republicans and conservatives are skeptical of Common Core as it pertains to a loss of local control for school districts, while the state's teachers
union is encouraging the movement as well
over concerns of how the results will impact performance
evaluations.
Without a real
evaluation plan in place created by the teacher's
unions and the State Education Department within 30 days, the government will take
over and institute an
evaluation plan.
New York State United Teachers, the state's largest teachers
union, supported the movement and leveraged it in the battle
over teacher and principal
evaluations.
Public employee
unions were angry with the governor for reducing pensions benefits for new workers, and teachers were upset
over a property tax cap, which impacts school budgets, and test - based
evaluations.
The testing question also figures prominently into the debate
over teacher performance
evaluations, as the governor has proposed making state test results 50 percent — instead of the current 40 percent — of the
evaluation system, a move that is strongly opposed by the teachers
unions that are closely allied with the Assembly Democrats.
The poll comes as the city and
union are butting heads
over a new teacher -
evaluation system, which would be used in teacher - firing decisions.
Bloomberg in turn accused the
union of walking away from negotiations
over a new teacher
evaluation system.
The
union, which didn't make an endorsement in the 2010 race either, has sparred with Cuomo
over teacher
evaluations, the Common Core standards and his support for charter schools....
The
union has sparred with Cuomo
over teacher
evaluations, the Common Core standards and his support for charter schools.
The teacher's
union, which is locked in a bitter war with Mayor Michael Bloomberg
over the terms of a new teacher
evaluation system, has repeatedly slammed the administration for using closures as a key method for turning schools around.
Teacher
union leaders, school administrators and state officials harmonized last week
over a proposed teacher
evaluation system.But Tuesday when Gov.Dannel P. Malloyannounced plans to reduce red tape and to «empower local school districts» — steps that...
But
unions and the State Education Department have battled
over how districts should handle teacher
evaluations in the absence of test scores, with the
union saying scores should be thrown out entirely and the state saying a backup measure should be used.
MANHATTAN — The city's teachers
union has taken to the airwaves once again with a new ad blasting Mayor Michael Bloomberg's education record as the two sides remain locked in a stalemate
over teacher
evaluations.
GOPers were furious
over what they viewed as heavy - handed lobbying by Bloomberg and his team as they tried last week to kill the governor's
union - favored compromise bill to limit the public release of teacher
evaluations, insiders say.
The state teacher's
union is currently embroiled in its own battle with the state DOE
over its push to implement tougher teacher
evaluation standards this fall.
Cuomo and the teacher
unions have been at war
over the governor's proposed education - reform package that would revamp the teacher tenure and
evaluation programs, make it easier to fire bad and lecherous instructors, and expand charter schools.
Mayor Bloomberg in his State of the City address on Jan. 12 proposed merit pay for teachers, vowed to step up efforts to remove ineffective teachers, blamed the
union for the breakdown of negotiations
over a teacher
evaluation system in 33 restart and transformation schools and announced that he would open 50 new charter schools in the next two years.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo can not penalize city schools by withholding $ 260 million in state aid
over the DOE's failure to get to a teacher
evaluation agreement with the
union, a Manhattan Supreme Court justice ruled on Feb. 21.
The state's Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) has decided to grant the UFT's request for the appointment of a mediator to help break the impasse between the
union and the Department of Education
over teacher
evaluations in 33 schools.
These shenanigans by the district and the
union have been presented to the public in a way that is designed to pull the wool
over people's eyes: «The result has been a perversion of the
evaluation system and a knowing effort to deceive the public using educational jargon.»
But can it possibly be true, as reported in his recent post, that the Regents and the New York State Department of Education went to court with the teachers
union over whether test scores would count as 20 percent or 40 percent of a teacher's annual
evaluation?
Meanwhile, in school districts from Washington, D.C., to Los Angeles and Seattle, teacher
unions and superintendents have clashed
over the use of new
evaluation systems that base compensation on student test scores.
The answer, again, is that the teachers
unions are opposed to performance - based
evaluations (as are most districts), and they have used their power
over the years to stand in the way of genuine reform.
Long - simmering battles flared up between Albany, New York City, and the
unions over teacher
evaluation.
These fights would serve as catharsis for beleaguered
unions — opportunities to release resentment
over testing,
evaluation, NCLB, VAM, and more.
The district sought to use that type of analysis, known in L.A. Unified as Academic Growth
over Time, in teacher
evaluations but was fiercely resisted by the teachers
union, which argues that it is unreliable.
A high - profile teacher
evaluation agreement was but days old Friday when Los Angeles Unified Superintendent John Deasy and the district's teachers
union expressed sharp disagreement
over a contentious provision.
As per Weingarten: «
Over a year ago, the Washington [DC] Teachers»
Union filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to see the data from the school district's IMPACT [teacher]
evaluation system — a system that's used for big choices, like the firing of 563 teachers in just the past four years, curriculum decisions, school closures and more [see prior posts about this as related to the IMPACT program here].
However, giving
unions more negotiating power
over evaluations would be a problem said Nancy Espinoza, a legislative advocate for the California School Boards Association in testimony before the Senate Education Committee a couple of weeks ago.
The recent groundbreaking agreement
over evaluations for educators in the Los Angeles school district is a major victory for the teachers
union because it limits the use of a controversial — but increasingly widespread — measurement of teacher effectiveness.
Not only will principals finally receive more meaningful feedback on their performance but the
union also agreed that student growth data — the major sticking point in the ongoing fight
over teacher
evaluations — could be one factor on which principals are rated.
The state's teachers»
union said it plans to call for a vote of no confidence in state Education Department Commissioner John King on the ongoing controversy
over new student testing and teacher
evaluations.
He noted that the district and
union already are negotiating
over terms of a teacher
evaluation that, under state law, must incorporate test scores.
But the bill, supported by the powerful California Teachers Assn., attracted a firestorm of criticism
over the costs to financially strapped districts and the requirement to negotiate with
unions every element of
evaluations, including the use of state standardized test scores.
Negotiations between the city and
union over new teacher
evaluations broke down in December.
School and
union leaders in the nation's largest school districts who are waging epic battles
over teacher
evaluation, compensation and the future of the teaching profession could learn a lesson from their colleagues in Newark, New Jersey.
In what may be among the first of many lawsuits
over the new
evaluations — which have been adopted by multiple states — the Florida teachers
union is challenging the state's use of test scores in decisions about which teachers are fired and which receive pay raises.
Over the past ten years, the policies undergirding the national education reform movement — offering more school choice, weakening teacher
union power, and creating new accountability systems (with incentives like pay - for - performance and teacher
evaluations based partly on student test scores)-- have taken hold in the nation's capital.
In an effort to settle the case, the district and its teachers»
union reach agreement on an
evaluation program that factors in standardized test scores as well as Academic Growth
over Time, a mathematical formula used to measure student achievement.
Chicago Public Schools (CPS) today announced REACH Students (Recognizing Educators Advancing Chicago's Students) a new, comprehensive teacher
evaluation system, designed
over the course of 90 hours of meetings in collaboration with the Chicago Teachers
Union (CTU), that will provide teachers with unprecedented tools and support to improve their practice and better drive student learning.
Education reform in K - 12 schools has become politically fraught, dividing teachers
unions, one of which endorsed Clinton during her 2008 presidential run, from Democrats in the Obama administration
over issues such as teacher tenure, performance
evaluations and school accountability.