As a Christian, I embrace him not because of my belief in
universal human goodness or my perception of the commonality of our faiths, but because I am trying to follow a Master who came to me, a stranger, and embraced me as a brother, and who bids me do the same to others.
Not exact matches
The essence of Jesus is the daring moral imperative, the
universal goodness of
human members, the spiritually catalyzed proletarianism which spread to the West, civilizing humanity and liberating the slave, man and woman.
However, combine this with the irrefutable observation of humanity that would see
human evil as
universal in its scope, and combine this with the fact that the VAST majority of
human beings disagreed with your interpretation of essential
human goodness, and the force of the conviction steels itself.
In the process of that widening estrangement, Christianity has lost its understanding of the Jewishness of Jesus; has lost touch with the culture out of which the message of Jesus was spoken, thus bringing a Gentile definition to Jewish words; and has lost its sense of the immediacy of God's working through scandalous particulars in
human history in order to affirm the
universal goodness of his creation.
It is significant that Vatican II (and also the Uppsala Assembly of the World Council of Churches) defines the church as the sacramental sign of the unity of all humanity, and also speaks of the presence of the Paschal Mystery among all peoples (see Decree on the Church, and the document on the Pastoral Constitution of the Church in the Modern World) This approach assumes that in Christianity, acknowledgment of Salvation (understood as the transcendent ultimate destiny of
human beings) finds expression and witness in the
universal struggle for Humanization (understood as the penultimate
human destiny) in world history which is shaped not only by the forces of
goodness and life, but also by the forces of evil and death.