Ideally, international law should also extend far beyond these traditional provisions for preserving the integrity and independence of sovereign states, into the domain
of universal human rights.
It is also the realm of our rights and responsibilities, which
includes universal human rights, but also certain British rights, such as the right to the NHS.
International political organization should have jurisdiction only in matters essential to basic peace and justice among the nations and to the preservation of
certain universal human rights everywhere.
Wild animals are not owed citizenship rights but should be regarded as members of sovereign communities and granted the animal equivalent
of universal human rights.
Complaints about the cultural «imposition» of ideas
about universal human rights are, more often than not, in the service of nationalism, racism, ideology, or power politics - or all of these in combination.
The particularity of the American regime is counterpoised by its foundation
in universal human rights, the modern articulation of our equality as beings created in the image of God.
The ideological underpinnings of
universal human rights jurisprudence can best be gathered by glimpses of International Conferences organized under the auspices of the United Nations.
Therefore, the Declaration can and should be used to inform our understanding of how existing,
universal human rights apply to the situations faced by Indigenous peoples worldwide.
Her name has undoubtedly become synonymous with the tireless struggle
for universal human rights, with pioneering lawyer Benedict Birnberg stating that Gareth Peirce has «transformed the criminal justice scene in this country almost single - handedly.»
By particularizing the rights of indigenous peoples, the Declaration seeks to accomplish what should have been accomplished without it: the application of
universal human rights principles in a way that appreciates not just the humanity of indigenous individuals but that also values the bonds of community they form...
When the catena of kaleidoscopic identities is open - ended, the meaningfulness of universal human nature and thus of everything predicated on that —
including universal human rights — becomes vanishingly small.
There is today a curious and dangerous convergence between philosophical nihilists and radical multiculturalists, on the one hand, and, on the other, those states that reject the idea
of universal human rights as an instance of cultural imperialism.
The party has long railed against Western values, including concepts like multi-party democracy and
universal human rights.
But the inclusion of the «right to the city» in the NUA meant watering it down, because it is not explicitly recognised as
a universal human right.
Religious freedom is
a universal human right.
«The United States stands in solidarity with Pastor Nadarkhani, his family, and all those who seek to practice their religion without fear of persecution - a fundamental and
universal human right.»
The openhearted observer of Islam in the West can discern the shape of hope in the increasing willingness of people of the two faiths to come together for dialogue and consultation on the mutual problems they face; in the reevaluation of Islam forced upon Muslims by their minority status in many places; and in the development of the concept of international law and
universal human rights.
The Declaration's language of
universal human rights is not the only moral language available to us in confronting threats to human dignity.
Moreover, in our time the language of
universal human rights is the most available discourse for cross-cultural deliberation about the dignity of the human person.
To speak of a universal human nature and of
universal human rights is not to deny the pluralism that marks the human condition.
Moreover, human exceptionalism is the predicate to
universal human rights.
To say the least,
universal human rights would be impossible to sustain in such an intellectual milieu.
Whole civilizations reject the Western conception of
universal human rights, including, principally, freedom of expression and freedom of religion.
History is not the inevitable march of progress, but there can be progress in history, and the last half century's widespread promulgation of the belief that there are
universal human rights is an instance of progress.
While the US was a particular political community, it was also based in recognition of
universal human rights.
The source of the confusion is the tension between the older standard of state sovereignty, which focuses moral obligation within political communities, and the emerging standards of
universal human rights, which call for intervention into states in the name of the rights of citizens and the pursuit of justice.
«We call upon the Iranian authorities to release Pastor Nadarkhani and demonstrate a commitment to basic,
universal human rights, including freedom of religion.»