Not exact matches
As for numerologists, scientists, and non-believers in general... to explain anything within our
universe completely and fully (even the big bang theory or evolution), one must eventually take a leap of faith and believe in something that
equations or definitions can't quantify.
Not only is all material being mutually correlative within the
equation that is the
universe, he defines matter
as that which relates to Transcendent Mind
as its source of being, meaning and finality.
The Christian indeed has always recognised the immediate primacy of secondary causes in the bringing about of natural phenomena, but
as serial causes have been traced further back, and their astonishing inter-dependence demonstrated, the scientist has tended to proclaim either a mathematical
universe in which theses secondary causes may be identified with some primary basic formula, or
equation, synonymous in definition with a physical ultimate, a
universe inwhich God has no place; or else he has preferred to identify intellect with matter itself and has come to accept that idealistic cosmic pantheism which is almost
as common a philosophy today
as evolutionary materialism.
The Ascent of Being Essential to the concept of evolution, then, is «the perspective of the
universe as the unfolding of a cosmic
equation of energies, numbers, values, natures, and individual entities».
No
equation could specify the amount of dark energy; it would just be luck — determined by which
universe had the right amount of dark energy to make it hospitable to life (an idea known
as the anthropic principle).
In Scherrer's
equations, the density of the energy in the field breaks into two pieces: One decreases
as the
universe's volume increases, like dark matter, while the other remains constant, like dark energy.
We know from very precise supernova observations that the
universe is accelerating, but at the same time we rely on coarse approximations to Einstein's
equations which may introduce serious side - effects, such
as the need for dark energy, in the models designed to fit the observational data.»
Smolin takes particular issue with two tenets of present - day physics: the claim that time
as we know it emerges from some deeper set of laws, like the quantum cosmological
equations Albrecht works with, and the belief that our
universe is just one of many.
The density of the
universe,
as shown in
Equation (4) on page 458, had to be fine tuned to one part in 1062.
In the case of intrinsic defects in space - time (e.g., cosmic strings or walls), the production of new defects
as the
universe expands is mathematically similar to a cosmological constant, although the value of the
equation of state for the defects depends on whether the defects are strings (one - dimensional) or walls (two - dimensional).
The solution of the field
equations that describe general relativity can yield answers to different physical situations, such
as planetary dynamics, the birth and death of stars, black holes, and the evolution of the
universe.