Sentences with phrase «universe than matter»

Not exact matches

We have no idea what's causing this gravity, though — we haven't directly detected the theorized particles that make up this mysterious material that doesn't seem to interact (other than gravitationally) with normal matter like light and the particles that we know and love, which is what makes it invisible, and therefore «dark» to most instruments normally used to understand our universe.

However, for many years, it has been evident that there is less than half of the amount of matter in the universe to account for a flat universe.

The simple fact is that if matter can neither be created or destroyed in a normal chemical reaction than how does the «god» come up with something out of nothing... remember matter CAN NOT be CREATED or DESTROYED, so if this god follows the normal physics and chemistry than it could not have created the universe either... it just exists b / c it exists..

It takes more faith to believe in a universe evolving from nothing or from eternal matter than to believe in a loving Creator, existing outside the limit of time, who gave us this specially designed & tuned universe to explore and to learn about caring for one another even through the midst of difficult experiences.

To believe that God created a mature universe and that everything was designed is actually easier to believe than to believe that everything just happened by chance, that matter just appeared from nothing and that present DNA was not designed.

If there is no God and the universe is a chance result of some great accident, then we are nothing more than bundles of chemicals and nothing matters.

There either is or is not something more to man than organic matter reacting to organic stimuli as a result of an accidental universe which on its face is nonsense.

On the contrary, the concept that the universe is the product of a rational mind provides a far better metaphysical basis for scientific rationality than the competing concept that everything in the universe (including our minds) is ultimately based in the mindless movements of matter.

However, the «laws» of physics, the interrelatedness of being within matter that lies at the heart of all natural science, beg the question: Why is the universe ordered as a unity (rather than being random)?

Glorious Lord Christ: the divine influence secretly diffused and active in the depths of matter, and the dazzling centre where all the innumerable fibres of the manifold meet; power as implacable as the world and as warm as life; you whose forehead is of the whiteness of snow, whose eyes are of fire, and whose feet are brighter than molten gold; you whose hands imprison the stars; you who are the first and the last, the living and the dead and the risen again; you who gather into your exuberant unity every beauty, every affinity, every energy, every mode of existence; it is you to whom my being cried out with a desire as vast as the universe, «In truth you are my Lord and my God.»

Even if you can't bring yourself to call it «God,» it is undeniable that the cause, whatever it is, must be transcendent and preexistent, as it had to have existed before everything else in order to have caused everything else; it must be immaterial, as its existence preceded the existence of matter; it must be intelligent, as evidenced by the complexity of the universe it caused; and it must itself be uncaused, existing necessarily rather than contingently.

«whatever it is, must be transcendent and preexistent, as it had to have existed before everything else in order to have caused everything else; it must be immaterial, as its existence preceded the existence of matter; it must be intelligent, as evidenced by the complexity of the universe it caused; and it must itself be uncaused, existing necessarily rather than contingently.»

According to physics, all the normal matter and energy in the universe are reverberations on a much larger medium than spacetime itself.

The lock this principle unlocks is bigger than just this small subject matter, but don't be fooled the power is tremendous as this is «THE» key to changing everything in your world and to have teh universe's tumblers open everything as it should be for you to enter.

Since it is more important for a proposition to be interesting than true, the traditional regard for propositions as the matter for judgments and the bias towards truth (even the expression «truth - value» is prejudiced against false propositions) has nearly dealt a fatal blow to the understanding of propositions» dynamic role in the universe.

However, astrophysics indicates that the matter that we can see or detect appears to be no more than about 4 per cent of the total matter in the universe.

I.E. the big bang theory which would require belief in the fact that some kinds of Matter ALWAYS existed and that at some point it all exploded and created a universe, a belief i might add, that in my view takes more faith to believe in than most modern religions.

Or, if more matter exists in the universe than we currently perceive, the force of gravity may stop the expansion process at some point and compel a recontraction, a sucking of all the galaxies, stars and planets back into a very dense and hot singularity.

The entire universe, matter, time and space, apparently came into existence out of an explosion from an object of inconceivable density — perhaps from something smaller than an atom.

In a few thousand years of recorded history, we went from dwelling in caves and mud huts and tee - pees, not understanding the natural world around us, or the broader universe, to being able to travel through space, using reason to ferret out the hidden secrets of how the world works, from physics to chemistry to biology, we worked out the tools and rules underpinning it all, mathematics, and now we can see objects that are almost impossibly small, the very tiniest building blocks of matter, (or at least we can examine them, even if you can't «see» them because you're using something other than your eyes and photons to view them) to the very farthest objects, the planets circling other, distant stars, that are in their own way, too small to see from here, like the atoms and parts of atoms themselves, detected indirectly, but indisputably THERE.

Support for string theory and the other 6 necessary dimensions allowing for an expanding universe is greater than that of spontaneous matter.

One dose of «You matter, your soul will live forever in happiness just as long as you keep coming back here» and away you go into the deep addiction of feeling more important in this universe than you are.

It is the unique characteristic of mankind that although we live in the physical universe - indeed we can trace our material origins back through the evolution of life and the physical development of matter, all the way back to the Big Bang itself - we yearn for something more than matter, something greater.

The shape of the universe can be determined by measuring the average density of matter within it, assuming that all matter is evenly distributed, rather than the distortions caused by «dense» objects such as galaxies.

This kind of random fluctuation is thought to have ultimately created our cosmos of stars, planets and existential worriers out of the quantum vacuum — admittedly abetted by some as - yet - unexplained happenstance, such as a period of faster - than - light inflation in the early universe, and matter somehow winning out against its evil twin, antimatter.

Riess has since hunted down supernovae that exploded more than 7 billion years ago, filling in gaps: The universe first slowed down as the inward pull of matter dominated over the relatively mild outward push of dark energy.

The story starts shortly after the Big Bang, which left a universe where matter was spread more or less, though not exactly, evenly: Certain regions of the cosmos started out slightly denser than average by a mere 0.001 percent.

But as all physicists know, the standard model doesn't explain everything — it accounts for less than 20 percent of the matter in the universe, for instance — the rest is invisible or «dark» and can not be made of the ordinary matter particles found on Earth.

It's a reality in which we matter far more than we ever could in a clockwork universe.»

It may be that matter never would have survived the universe's primordial fireworks had it not been for the behavior of neutrinos, tiny particles that were once regarded as little more than curiosities.

Meanwhile, a study to be published in Astrophysical Bulletin that used just the radial velocities of stars found, similar to Moni Bidin's team, that much less dark matter than expected was required to explain the motions of stars in the local universe.

Now we are a step closer to understanding it, thanks to an experiment which creates more matter than antimatter, just like the early universe did.

Higgs particles may get an upgrade from by - product to big player in the explanation of how the universe ended up with more matter than antimatter.

The best cosmic map yet of the universe's make - up finds 24 per cent less dark matter than we thought and could call for a rewrite of physics

As the first matter began to emerge from the Big Bang, it went through a number of phases much as steam condenses to water and eventually freezes as it cools — except rather than water, you get the first recognizable matter in the universe — a hot soup of quarks and gluons.

DARK matter — the mysterious substance thought to make up about 80 per cent of the universe's matter — could be more mundane than thought.

Even weirder than dark matter — the invisible stuff constituting most of the mass of the universe — is dark energy, a mysterious force pushing the universe apart at an ever - faster rate.

That particle, whatever it may be, would be available in abundant quantities and could thus be a good candidate for the mysterious dark matter believed to account for more than one - quarter of the stuff in the universe.

Last year, an international coalition called the Tokai to Kamioka (T2K) collaboration produced new evidence for this strange phenomenon, which may lead to insights about why there is more matter than antimatter in the universe.

The result amplifies scientists» suspicions that the lightweight elementary particles could help explain why the universe has much more matter than antimatter.

The only way such a universe could create complex matter would be to have started out with fewer neutrons and more free protons than our universe did.

The universe does have many more particles of matter than antimatter, but the exact ratio is unknown.

This hypothetical particle could potentially be linked to dark matter, the invisible substance that is five times more prevalent in the universe than regular matter.

Researchers presented the results today (July 21) at the 11th Identification of Dark Matter Conference (IDM2016) in Sheffield, U.K., which gathers together researchers seeking to understand dark matter, the mysterious material that appears to make up more than four - fifths of the universe's mass, but which scientists have not observed dirMatter Conference (IDM2016) in Sheffield, U.K., which gathers together researchers seeking to understand dark matter, the mysterious material that appears to make up more than four - fifths of the universe's mass, but which scientists have not observed dirmatter, the mysterious material that appears to make up more than four - fifths of the universe's mass, but which scientists have not observed directly.

This mysterious substance that makes up much more of the universe than regular matter may have the right «interaction strength» to show up in LHC experiments.

Observations of galaxy cB58 (arrow) hint that the universe has less ordinary matter than astronomers thought.

Dark matter is theorized as one of the basic constituents of the universe, five times more abundant than ordinary matter.

The pattern of these decays should help us to better understand why matter is so much more prevalent in the universe than antimatter, and could provide indirect evidence for the existence of new kinds of fundamental particle.

Researchers using the BaBar Detector at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center in California have spent the past four years smashing together electrons and their antimatter counterparts — positrons — to explore one of the greatest mysteries in the universe: Why is everything made from matter, rather than antimatter?

It would also imply a fundamental asymmetry between matter and antimatter that would go some way toward explaining why the universe today contains far more matter than antimatter, even though equal amounts of each should have been made in the big bang.