The Supreme Court of Canada has addressed the potential for MMPs to result in
unjust outcomes in cases, the report notes, such as in R. Morrissey, R. v. Nur and R. v. Lloyd.
Not exact matches
If the insurance requirement is impossible to meet, then that is no different than a death penalty for that dog
in most
cases, and would be considered an inhumane and
unjust outcome that wasn't anticipated by the legislators.
To avoid what would otherwise be an
unjust outcome the court could,
in an appropriate
case, depart from the market value approach when assessing the time value of money or, indeed, when assessing the value of any other benefit gained by a defendant.