We first examined bees waggle dancing for natural food sources that received stop signals elicited by
unknown natural causes (SS naturally elicited): 42 % of these waggle dances ended with a stop signal in the last two deciles of the dance (significantly different from a uniform distribution, χ92 = 33, p = 0.0001).
Not exact matches
The Alberta Energy Regulator still regards the
cause of the Primrose leak as
unknown (Canadian
Natural Resources Ltd..)
I repeat the idea of an
unknown natural beginning is far and away more reasonable than an
unknown supernatural
cause.
The universe is 13.7 billion years old (cosmology: best estimate based on available data)- nothing to do with Atheism The earth is 4.5 billion years old (cosmology: best estimate based on available data)- nothing to do with Atheism Life emerged from non-life (Biogenesis theory...
cause and process
unknown)- nothing to do with Atheism Life spread and diversified through evolution (best available explanation)- nothing to do with Atheism Man evolved from common ape ancestor (evolution science)- nothing to do with Atheism Consciousness is an emergent property of the brain (neuroscience)- nothing to do with Atheism Emotions, memories and intelligence are functions of the brain (neuroscience)- nothing to do with Atheism Morals are emergent qualities of social animals (
natural science)- nothing to do with Atheism
Chaos theory now helps us to understand how small and
unknown factors can be instrumental in
causing significant change in
natural phenomena.
Along with the nutrients you are also giving your child tons of refined sugar, highly refined and GMO soybean oil,
natural and artificial flavors (
unknown ingredients), carrageenan (potentially cancer
causing), monoglycerides (hidden trans fats), artificial colorings, and sucralose (fake sugars).
Scientists supposed this was just a phase of some mild
natural cycle, with
unknown causes.
He then at an
unknown date returned the Elder Wand to the grave of Albus Dumbledore, located on the grounds of Hogwarts, supposing that, if he died of
natural causes, its power would finally be broken, and its history of blood and violence along with it.
The absence of convincing attribution of periods other than 1976 - present to anthropogenic forcing leaves
natural climate variability as the
cause — some combination of solar (including solar indirect effects), uncertain volcanic forcing,
natural internal (intrinsic variability) and possible
unknown unknowns.
Scientists supposed this was just a phase of some mild
natural cycle, probably regional, with
unknown causes.
My understanding of the literature in climatology tells me that the null hypothesis that climate / weather has been changing due to
natural and / or
unknown causes has been well - established for a long while.
The fact in point (5) indicates that most of the change to the 12C: 13C isotope ratio of atmospheric CO2 and most of the recent increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration was
caused by some
unknown,
natural (i.e. non-anthropogenic) effect.
In the case of climatology, I suppose this should have involved an experiment / investigation showing that recent warming can ONLY or MOSTLY be attributed to human forcings (e.g.; CO2 emissions) and not to
natural and / or
unknown causes.
Therefore, it is possible that all of the rise in atmospheric CO2 concentration and all of the change to the 13C: 12C atmospheric isotope change were
caused by the anthropogenic emission that induced the
unknown,
natural (i.e. non-anthropogenic) effect that
caused the observed change to the 12C: 13C isotope ratio of atmospheric CO2.
Even the scale and trend behind
natural variability is subject to an
unknown number of overlapping cycles from multiple
causes many of which are
unknown, unquantified or both.
Simply, it is possible that none of the rise in atmospheric CO2 concentration and none of the change to the 13C: 12C atmospheric isotope change were
caused by anthropogenic emission but were due to the
unknown,
natural (i.e. non-anthropogenic) effect that
caused most of the change to the 12C: 13C isotope ratio of atmospheric CO2.
We can thus see that scientists, once again, are forced to admit the possibility, even the necessity, of the supernatural, «some
unknown agent» that
caused what is impossible by the
natural laws we know to happen anyway.
Of course, it's always possible that some
natural cycle exists,
unknown to scientists and their instruments, that is currently
causing the planet to warm.
If we could get a much better handle on the
causes, effects, and timing of the
natural variability, thus removing more of the
unknowns from the weather / climate equation, it would be much easier to see the actual amounts of CO2 forcing.
«Because the statistics, the logic and plain common sense tells us that man - made warming is smaller than «
natural variation» or the «
unknowns» that
caused the climate models to fail, we can confidently say:
As we still do not know how the main
natural forcings work, let alone the
unknown or little - known ones, we therefore can not make ANY assertions towards the attribution of «blame» (as it were), towards any UnNatural forcings - i.e. the attribution of man - made co2 as the
cause.
It is not necessary to show that it is very likely that half is
natural, i.e. can be attributed to «known»
natural causes, but merely that it can not be shown that it is very likely that less than half of it could possibly be due to
natural causes either known or
unknown.
He then goes on to give two examples of how to use «GCM results to identify
natural changes of
unknown causes.»
Since the insurer is taking on an
unknown health risk, they will apply a waiting period of two or three years before they will pay the death benefit if you die within that period from
natural causes.