A person would no longer have to prove that they were unable to retreat «with complete personal safety» when faced with
unlawful deadly force, as the law currently requires.
Not exact matches
Most recently, the state of Indiana has taken the castle doctrine even one step further, becoming the first state to specifically permit its residents to use
deadly force in response to the «
unlawful intrusion by another individual or a public servant.»
Kindaka Sanders, A Reason to Resist: The Use of
Deadly Force in Aiding Victims of
Unlawful Police Aggression, 52 San Diego L. Rev. 695, 732 - 35 (2015)(footnotes omitted).
Section 35 -41-3-2 provides, in essence, that an intervener may come to the aid of the perceived victim of
unlawful police aggression and may, under certain circumstances, use
deadly force to protect a third party, even a stranger, from excessive police
force...
There are quite a few, which means that in practice
deadly force could be considered
unlawful in self - defense.
It can be legal to use
deadly force to resist
unlawful arrest.
776.013 (3) A person who is not engaged in an
unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet
force with
force, including
deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.