Governor's Program Bill No. 328, S. 68004 / A.42004: Relates to cost - sharing, deductible or co-insurance for tier IV prescription drugs and
unlawful discriminatory practice in prescribing such drugs; repealer.
Not exact matches
Government Code § 12926 states it is
unlawful to engage
in specified
discriminatory practices in employment or housing accommodations on the basis of sex.
The package would also impact the private sector, with one bill seeking to codify
in law that sexual harassment is an
unlawful and
discriminatory practice and ensure that employees of small businesses can bring claims against their employers.
This rule was originally intended to limit
discriminatory practices in the auto loan business and clarify that lenders offering loans via dealerships are responsible for any
discriminatory and
unlawful pricing, according to NPR.
It shall be an
unlawful discriminatory practice for any employer to refuse to hire or employ or to bar or discharge from employment, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual
in compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because of the individual's credit history or credit report
To amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination
in Employment Act of 1967, and to modify the operation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, to clarify that a
discriminatory compensation decision or other
practice that is
unlawful under such Acts occurs each time compensation is paid pursuant to the
discriminatory compensation decision or other
practice, and for other purposes.
The bill's stated purpose is «to amend Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination
in Employment Act of 1967, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to clarify that a
discriminatory compensation decision or other
practice that is
unlawful under such Acts occurs each time compensation is paid pursuant to the
discriminatory compensation decision or other
practice, and for other purposes.»
H.R. 2831 also amends the Age Discrimination
in Employment Act of 1967 to declare that an
unlawful practice occurs when a
discriminatory compensation decision or other
practice is adopted; when a person becomes subject to the decision or other
practice; or, when a person is affected by application of a
discriminatory compensation decision or other
practice - including each time compensation is paid.
In the case of an alleged unlawful practice occurring in a State which has a law prohibiting discrimination in employment because of age and establishing or authorizing a State authority to grant or seek relief from such discriminatory practice, no suit may be brought under section 626 of this title [section 7] before the expiration of sixty days after proceedings have been commenced under the State law, unless such proceedings have been earlier terminated: Provided, That such sixty - day period shall be extended to one hundred and twenty days during the first year after the effective date of such State la
In the case of an alleged
unlawful practice occurring
in a State which has a law prohibiting discrimination in employment because of age and establishing or authorizing a State authority to grant or seek relief from such discriminatory practice, no suit may be brought under section 626 of this title [section 7] before the expiration of sixty days after proceedings have been commenced under the State law, unless such proceedings have been earlier terminated: Provided, That such sixty - day period shall be extended to one hundred and twenty days during the first year after the effective date of such State la
in a State which has a law prohibiting discrimination
in employment because of age and establishing or authorizing a State authority to grant or seek relief from such discriminatory practice, no suit may be brought under section 626 of this title [section 7] before the expiration of sixty days after proceedings have been commenced under the State law, unless such proceedings have been earlier terminated: Provided, That such sixty - day period shall be extended to one hundred and twenty days during the first year after the effective date of such State la
in employment because of age and establishing or authorizing a State authority to grant or seek relief from such
discriminatory practice, no suit may be brought under section 626 of this title [section 7] before the expiration of sixty days after proceedings have been commenced under the State law, unless such proceedings have been earlier terminated: Provided, That such sixty - day period shall be extended to one hundred and twenty days during the first year after the effective date of such State law.
Under this amendment to the city's Human Rights Law, it is also an
unlawful discriminatory practice for an employer to consider an applicant's salary history
in determining the salary, benefits, or other forms of compensation for that applicant.
One of the effects of the High Court rejecting terra nullius
in Mabo (No. 2) as a past
discriminatory practice, and recognising native title as a pre-existing right was that acts of dispossession which failed to recognise the procedural or substantive rights of native title holders were, after the implementation of the Racial Discrimination Act (Cth)(RDA)
in 1975,
unlawful.