The nucleus is hardly enough to sustain congregational life
unless other people in the community can he attracted.
Not exact matches
Latest was explosions
in India marked as «Islamic Jihadists» and another
in Pakistan although I was surprised that it was not marked as «Hindu Jihadists»... That would have had both Great Countries confront each
other serving the purpose of
other competing nations over the Rich Indian Peninsular... Believe me no nation fall back
unless people of her own are traitors to it's nations principals and beliefs for the reason of Hate, Envy, Revenge, or Greeds towards material wealth even if by selling their Dignity and integrity or their family, tribe,
community, the nation and the country it wouldn't mean much to them... and those can be found among every level of the one Society...
Consider this... a
person goes to college, gets a four year degree
in archaeology (or some antiquities preservation analog); spends summers sifting through sand and rock and gravel, all the while taking graduate level classes...
person eventually obtains the vaunted PhD
in archaeology... then works his / her tail off seeking funding for an archeological excavation, with the payoff being more funding, and more opportunities to dig
in the dirt... do you think professional archaeologists are looking hard for evidence of the Exodus on a speculative basis... not a chance... they know their PhD buys them nothing more than a job at Tel Aviv Walmart if they don't discover and publish... so they write grants for digs near established sites /
communities, and stay employed sifting rock
in culturally safe areas... not
unless some shepard stumbles upon a rare find
in an unexpected place do you get archeological interest and action
in remote places... not at all surprising that the pottery and
other evidence of the Exodus and
other biblical events lie waiting to be discovered... doesn't mean not there... just not found yet...
(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the child; (3) the preferences of each child; (4) the wishes of the parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the child with each parent, the child's siblings, and any
other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the best interest of the child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent child relationship between the child and the
other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive behavior of the parents
in an effort to involve the child
in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the
other parent
in front of the child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved
in the life of the child; (10) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and
community environments; (11) the stability of the child's existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or
other party,
in and of itself, must not be determinative of custody
unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not
in the best interest of the child; (13) the child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence
in the past year,
unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17)
other factors as the court considers necessary.
(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the child; (3) the preferences of each child; (4) the wishes of the parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the child with each parent, the child's siblings, and any
other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the best interest of the child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent child relationship between the child and the
other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive behavior of the parents
in an effort to involve the child
in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the
other parent
in front of the child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved
in the life of the child; (10) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and
community environments; (11) the stability of the child's existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or
other party,
in and of itself, must not be determinative of custody
unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not
in the best interest of the child; (13) the child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence
in the past year,
unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17)
other factors as the court considers necessary