Temperature feedback (which seems
unlikely given the magnitude and profile in time) or something different?
Not exact matches
Given the
magnitude of this decline, it is very
unlikely that we will see anything close to pre-recession levels of small - business lending next year.
«
Given the
magnitude of these debts, commitments to reduce emissions and biodiversity loss are
unlikely to be realized without specific actions that directly address this damaging environmental legacy.»
It seems
unlikely that 60 min of elevated skin temperature and perspiration would be long enough for microbial growth dynamics to effect the
magnitude of changes observed,
given that bacterial doubling times generally exceed 20 min even in optimal conditions.
Highly
unlikely,
given all the other causes, and their
magnitudes, and
given the conservative estimates of climate trends, presented in the IPCC reports.
It seems clear that the new data (including HadSST3) will be closer to the models than previously, if not quite perfectly in line (but
given the uncertainties in the
magnitude of the Krakatoa forcing, a perfect match is
unlikely).
It is a quite
unlikely thing to happen
given the
magnitude of the trend and the
magnitude of the measurement error.