Among his contentions is that Stern «assumes we will continue to pump out carbon far into the 22nd century — a rather
unlikely scenario given the falling cost of alternative fuels.»
Not exact matches
Given that Goldman has historically sought to maximize profits, the former
scenario is
unlikely, implying that even though the bank is currently targeting consumers with good credit, there is a risk the bank may have to relax lending requirements to attract more clients.
This
scenario seems rather
unlikely,
given the current long - term chart formation.
That's because a trial like this one is almost without precedent in modern medical research: It involves
giving children a vaccine that is almost certain not to benefit them, and that might harm them, all to protect other children from an
unlikely scenario — a large - scale anthrax attack.
However even the moderate
scenarios which have eventual stabilisation
give more warming than 0.8 C. Even in the extremely
unlikely event that there is no further growth in emissions, the current planetary energy imbalance (estimated to be almost 1W / m2)(due to the ocean thermal inertia) implies that there is around 0.5 C extra warming already in the pipeline that will be realised over the next 20 to 30 years.
Chevron appears to view future fossil fuel demand from an IEA Current Policies
Scenario that assumes no climate action through 2035 — but such a scenario is exceedingly unlikely given actions
Scenario that assumes no climate action through 2035 — but such a
scenario is exceedingly unlikely given actions
scenario is exceedingly
unlikely given actions to date.