Sentences with phrase «unmet need for legal services»

The Task Force found that despite the tremendous efforts of Legal Aid, Clinics, Pro Bono Programs, and other access to justice programs, the unmet need for legal services among low - to - moderate income Oregonians is larger than ever.

We should care because the US suffers from a huge unmet need for legal services — a need so great that some consider it to be a human rights crisis.

They understand that there is a massive unmet need for legal services, and that ABSs together with technology, offer a way to address that need.

The point is that we have a large unmet need for legal services and it is in the public interest to do something about it.

All the evidence — and there is quite a lot of it — shows that there is a continuing high level of unmet need for legal services.

«Massive evidence shows that there is a huge unmet need for legal services,» says Alex Roy, then - head of development and research of the Legal Services Board of England and Wales.

Massive evidence shows that there is a huge unmet need for legal services.

Given the severity of the unmet need for legal services in the US (discussed in detail in part III), it is difficult to find fault with these and the many other calls that are repeatedly made for greater public funding for legal aid.

This effectively opens the door for non-lawyers to fulfil this unmet need for legal services.

However, as Hadfield explains in detail, the amount of pro bono services that are provided in this manner do not even scratch the surface of the number of hours that would be required to fulfill the unmet need for legal services in the US.

Lauren's story illustrates in a dramatic fashion how the unmet need for legal services in the US constitutes a human rights crisis.

While the unmet need for legal services affects virtually every person of low and middle income, it disproportionally affects women and racial minorities.

But to the extent such solutions are available, they are available only to the most impoverished — they are not solutions made available to the middle class, let alone to entrepreneurs and small businesses, even though those populations also suffer from a huge unmet need for legal services.

There is a critical element that the article fails to mention: there is simply no conceivable way that pro bono work could ever come close to meeting the huge unmet need for legal services.

As just a brief sampling, in «The Cost of Law: Promoting Access to Justice through the (Un) Corporate Practice of Law» [2] and «Life in the Law - Thick World: The Legal Resource Landscape for Ordinary Americans» [3](with Jaime Heine), Hadfield uses empirical evidence to demonstrate that there can never be enough pro bono (free) legal work or enough money for legal aid that could even come close to satisfying the huge unmet need for legal services in the US.

At the same time, there is a huge unmet need for legal services — lawyers are unable or unwilling to meet the need — they don't even come close to meeting it.

Recommendation 10: Resources should be vastly expanded to support long - standing efforts that have proven successful in addressing the public's unmet needs for legal services.

What opportunities exist to develop new business models that serve unmet needs for legal services?

This point that there are unmet needs for legal services is proven by looking at where innovation is actually happening outside of the regulated sphere or where alternative structures are permitted — and it is not in litigation but in the market for legal services.

Not exact matches

Many new lawyers are un - or under - employed, even though there is a substantial need for legal services that is unmet.

Lawyers should consider unbundling or limited scope retainers as there are opportunities to help large numbers of clients who can pay for help on a part of their matter (visit practicepro.ca / limitedscope) for tools and resources to help you provide limited scope services), but unbundled services can only chip away at part of the unmet legal needs problem.

If lawyers are not able or willing to meet 100 % of our country's needs for legal services, then they need to get out of the way — they need to stop blocking others who would like to step up and try meet some of those unmet needs.

As discussed in detail in Part III, today total public spending for the Legal Services Corporation and other legal aid, combined with charitable donations for legal aid, is about $ 3.7 billion per year, [11] whereas Professor Gillian Hadfield's research estimates that $ 50 billion per year would be required to secure one hour of legal assistance for households with unmet dispute - related nLegal Services Corporation and other legal aid, combined with charitable donations for legal aid, is about $ 3.7 billion per year, [11] whereas Professor Gillian Hadfield's research estimates that $ 50 billion per year would be required to secure one hour of legal assistance for households with unmet dispute - related nlegal aid, combined with charitable donations for legal aid, is about $ 3.7 billion per year, [11] whereas Professor Gillian Hadfield's research estimates that $ 50 billion per year would be required to secure one hour of legal assistance for households with unmet dispute - related nlegal aid, is about $ 3.7 billion per year, [11] whereas Professor Gillian Hadfield's research estimates that $ 50 billion per year would be required to secure one hour of legal assistance for households with unmet dispute - related nlegal assistance for households with unmet dispute - related needs.

That means taking a close look at what regulatory incentives or directives (or, perhaps as a last resort, taxes on the new capital investments) might ensure the development of affordable, effective and fair legal services and products for people with currently unmet legal needs.

People often say 80 % of the legal need goes unmet, and what they're almost always talking about when they say that, is this Legal Services Corporation study that is probably getting a little bit long in the tooth, but was a well done study that shows that about 80 % of the people who qualify for legal aid and have a legal problem that legal aid could help with, nevertheless get turned away, mostly because of a lack of resoulegal need goes unmet, and what they're almost always talking about when they say that, is this Legal Services Corporation study that is probably getting a little bit long in the tooth, but was a well done study that shows that about 80 % of the people who qualify for legal aid and have a legal problem that legal aid could help with, nevertheless get turned away, mostly because of a lack of resouLegal Services Corporation study that is probably getting a little bit long in the tooth, but was a well done study that shows that about 80 % of the people who qualify for legal aid and have a legal problem that legal aid could help with, nevertheless get turned away, mostly because of a lack of resoulegal aid and have a legal problem that legal aid could help with, nevertheless get turned away, mostly because of a lack of resoulegal problem that legal aid could help with, nevertheless get turned away, mostly because of a lack of resoulegal aid could help with, nevertheless get turned away, mostly because of a lack of resources.

In order to identify a less costly path to a career in legal services and address unmet needs for specific types of legal services, the MSBA should establish a separate task force focused on studying the viability of certifying Limited License Legal Technicians («LLLT») with authority to provide supervised legal services in defined practice alegal services and address unmet needs for specific types of legal services, the MSBA should establish a separate task force focused on studying the viability of certifying Limited License Legal Technicians («LLLT») with authority to provide supervised legal services in defined practice alegal services, the MSBA should establish a separate task force focused on studying the viability of certifying Limited License Legal Technicians («LLLT») with authority to provide supervised legal services in defined practice aLegal Technicians («LLLT») with authority to provide supervised legal services in defined practice alegal services in defined practice areas.

Technology can be a powerful tool in narrowing the justice gap — the difference between the unmet need for civil legal services and the resources available to meet that need.

The LSC has found through its experience with its Technology Initiative Grant program that technology can be a powerful tool in narrowing the justice gap — the difference between the unmet need for civil legal services and the resources available to meet that need.

And I think that if you look at the market generally, with 40,000 law school graduates for 20,000 law firm jobs in the US in 2014 and 2015, there's a vast kind of oversupply of lawyers, but at the same token, there is a huge unmet legal need among middle class people especially for legal services.

The most recent Legal Services Corporation report, The Justice Gap: Measuring the Unmet Civil Legal Needs of Low - Income Americans, found that not only do low - income American citizens receive inadequate or no legal help for 86 % of their civil legal problems but over 71 % of these households had at least one civil legal problem in the past Legal Services Corporation report, The Justice Gap: Measuring the Unmet Civil Legal Needs of Low - Income Americans, found that not only do low - income American citizens receive inadequate or no legal help for 86 % of their civil legal problems but over 71 % of these households had at least one civil legal problem in the past Legal Needs of Low - Income Americans, found that not only do low - income American citizens receive inadequate or no legal help for 86 % of their civil legal problems but over 71 % of these households had at least one civil legal problem in the past legal help for 86 % of their civil legal problems but over 71 % of these households had at least one civil legal problem in the past legal problems but over 71 % of these households had at least one civil legal problem in the past legal problem in the past year.

Concerned about the issue of the unmet legal needs of the public, I served on the boards of legal services programs, created referral programs for the Massachusetts Bar Association and the National Lawyers Guild, started an association of legal clinics, and served as president of a family mediation association.

Some suppose that governments would have been motivated by great shame and political pressure to bolster legal aid if not for the proliferation of organized pro bono legal services around unmet legal needs.

Rather, limiting the means of production of legal service to spending lawyer time (or time directly supervised by a lawyer on a problem) is inherently limiting and so needs for some legal services are unmet.

Pro bono is not a substitute for publicly funded legal services but there is increasing concern that expansion of pro bono encourages the state to allow pro bono work to fill the gap of unmet legal need.

The most recent Senate report on access to justice published in 2009, for example, concluded that «the legal system is not sufficiently providing members of the Australian community with access to justice'i and in its first recommendation proposed that the various tiers of government fund «a comprehensive national survey of demand and unmet need for legal assistance services in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities.