The GOP is obviously against «needless restrictions,» yet they are super cool with medically
unnecessary abortion restrictions that shut down health centers and make some women travel hundreds of miles to access abortion (if they can at all).
The resistance starts now: Planned Parenthood, ACLU, and the Center for Reproductive Rights just filed lawsuits in Alaska, Missouri, and North Carolina over dangerous, unconstitutional, medically
unnecessary abortion restrictions.
Not exact matches
Planned Parenthood, which operates the only licensed
abortion clinic in the state, has called these
restrictions «medically
unnecessary.»
Annapolis, MD - Monday, April 9, 2012 marked the end of the 430th Maryland Legislative Session, and Planned Parenthood of Maryland (PPM) is celebrating the defeat of four bills that would have added medically
unnecessary restrictions on
abortion.
PPGP opened its new health center so that patients have one more trusted option in Oklahoma City and we will continue providing the excellent care patients have come to know and trust, in spite of some of the toughest medically
unnecessary restrictions against
abortion providers in the nation,» Planned Parenthood Great Plains President and CEO, Laura McQuade said.
Florida, where extreme lawmakers passed a bill that blocks access to birth control and cancer screenings, and includes Texas - style medically
unnecessary restrictions on safe, legal
abortion that could shutter health centers;
Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains (PPGP) and Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region (PPSLR) celebrate today's federal court opinion, which blocks medically
unnecessary restrictions against
abortion providers in Missouri.
In June, the United States Supreme Court clearly ruled in Whole Woman's Health v Hellerstedt that the same medically
unnecessary restrictions in Texas created an undue burden, which violated the constitutional rights of a patient seeking safe and legal
abortion.
that the same medically
unnecessary restrictions in Texas created an undue burden, which violated the constitutional rights of a patient seeking safe and legal
abortion.
Kansas City, MO — Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains (PPGP) and Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region (PPSLR) celebrate today's federal court opinion, which blocks medically
unnecessary restrictions against
abortion providers in Missouri.
Austin, TX — Despite the fact that
abortion is one of the safest medical procedures performed in the United States, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit today ruled that medically
unnecessary restrictions that could severely restrict Texas women's access to safe, legal
abortion are constitutional.
The case exposed the lie that anti-abortion politicians have been peddling for years: that it's somehow «safer» for women when the state imposes medically
unnecessary, onerous
restrictions on health centers and clinicians that provide
abortions.
Missouri politicians recently added even more medically
unnecessary restrictions on safe, legal
abortion by passing Senate Bill 5.
It's about whether to uphold severe, medically
unnecessary restrictions that have already devastated access to safe, legal
abortion in Texas.
On Wednesday, the Missouri House debated and passed Rep. Franklin's (R - Camdenton) House Bill 194, a bill full of medically
unnecessary restrictions on
abortion.
These medically
unnecessary restrictions impose an undue burden on patients» constitutional right to access
abortion.
In a statement, Planned Parenthood advocates in Missouri called Greitens» actions an «extreme, frivolous and expensive effort to endanger women's health with even more medically
unnecessary restrictions on safe, legal
abortion.»