I've found myself at the center of such episodes more than once, as a result of what's become known as the iconic «hockey stick» diagram that my co-authors and I had published in the late 1990s — a graphic display of the data that made plain
the unprecedented rate of global warming.
Not exact matches
However, the big unknown remaining is whether corals can adapt to
global warming, which is now occurring at an
unprecedented rate — at about two orders
of magnitude faster than occurred with the ending
of the last Ice Age.
The
rate and magnitude
of 20th century
warming are thus unknowable, and suggestions
of an
unprecedented trend in 20th century
global air temperature are unsustainable.
I am concerned about the «vast expanse
of western Sibera is undergoing an
unprecedented thaw that could dramatically increase the
rate of global warming, climate scientists warn».
The DECC used to show the actual temp data CET data set graph (still only 150 years
of it) on the DECC website, but following Phil Jones stating in that BBC interview, 3 similar
warming periods, and
rates of warming in the last 150 years and that you could clearly see this on the graph, the pronouncement by the DECC that this graph showed «
unprecedented» man made
global warming, seemed ridiculous.
Indeed, an Australian reporter even suggested that «years
of global warming and increased CO2 emissions have caused these trees to grow at an
unprecedented rate, providing more fuel for these fires.»
«Climate science» as it is used by warmists implies adherence to a set
of beliefs: (1) Increasing greenhouse gas concentrations will
warm the Earth's surface and atmosphere; (2) Human production
of CO2 is producing significant increases in CO2 concentration; (3) The
rate of rise
of temperature in the 20th and 21st centuries is
unprecedented compared to the
rates of change
of temperature in the previous two millennia and this can only be due to rising greenhouse gas concentrations; (4) The climate
of the 19th century was ideal and may be taken as a standard to compare against any current climate; (5)
global climate models, while still not perfect, are good enough to indicate that continued use
of fossil fuels at projected
rates in the 21st century will cause the CO2 concentration to rise to a high level by 2100 (possibly 700 to 900 ppm); (6) The
global average temperature under this condition will rise more than 3 °C from the late 19th century ideal; (7) The negative impact on humanity
of such a rise will be enormous; (8) The only alternative to such a disaster is to immediately and sharply reduce CO2 emissions (reducing emissions in 2050 by 80 % compared to today's
rate) and continue further reductions after 2050; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100 resulting in significant damage to humanity; (10) Such reductions in CO2 emissions are technically feasible and economically affordable while providing adequate energy to a growing world population that is increasingly industrializing.
Global Warming alarmists tell us that the world is heating at an
unprecedented rate due to the
unprecedented output
of human greenhouse gas emissions.
The Trump administration inherited a climate change situation from the Obama presidency
of an
unprecedented 5 - year
global warming rate for the period since 1950.
This could tell us if the recent large
rate of increase in power dissipation is
unprecedented and thus likely linked to
global warming.
The current
warming trend is
of particular significance because most
of it is extremely likely (greater than 95 percent probability) to be the result
of human activity since the mid-20th century and proceeding at a
rate that is
unprecedented over decades to millennia.1 Earth - orbiting satellites and other technological advances have enabled scientists to see the big picture, collecting many different types
of information about our planet and its climate on a
global scale.