It is these multiple lines of evidence that give the scientific community such strong confidence that humans are responsible for the recent
unprecedented warming of the surface of the Earth.
Not exact matches
While the planet's
surface temperatures over the past century have risen to
unprecedented levels, records have shown a slowdown in the pace
of warming over the past 15 years.
... a pronounced strengthening in Pacific trade winds over the past two decades —
unprecedented in observations / reanalysis data and not captured by climate models — is sufficient to account for the cooling
of the tropical Pacific and a substantial slowdown in
surface warming through increased subsurface ocean heat uptake.
The record - breaking year
of 2005 had below - average dust over the Atlantic, very
warm sea
surface temperatures, and an
unprecedented four hurricanes that reached category 5, the highest classification.
Abstract:... Here we show that a pronounced strengthening in Pacific trade winds over the past two decades —
unprecedented in observations / reanalysis data and not captured by climate models — is sufficient to account for the cooling
of the tropical Pacific and a substantial slowdown in
surface warming through increased subsurface ocean heat uptake.
«Climate science» as it is used by warmists implies adherence to a set
of beliefs: (1) Increasing greenhouse gas concentrations will
warm the Earth's
surface and atmosphere; (2) Human production
of CO2 is producing significant increases in CO2 concentration; (3) The rate
of rise
of temperature in the 20th and 21st centuries is
unprecedented compared to the rates
of change
of temperature in the previous two millennia and this can only be due to rising greenhouse gas concentrations; (4) The climate
of the 19th century was ideal and may be taken as a standard to compare against any current climate; (5) global climate models, while still not perfect, are good enough to indicate that continued use
of fossil fuels at projected rates in the 21st century will cause the CO2 concentration to rise to a high level by 2100 (possibly 700 to 900 ppm); (6) The global average temperature under this condition will rise more than 3 °C from the late 19th century ideal; (7) The negative impact on humanity
of such a rise will be enormous; (8) The only alternative to such a disaster is to immediately and sharply reduce CO2 emissions (reducing emissions in 2050 by 80 % compared to today's rate) and continue further reductions after 2050; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100 resulting in significant damage to humanity; (10) Such reductions in CO2 emissions are technically feasible and economically affordable while providing adequate energy to a growing world population that is increasingly industrializing.
Joshua, the first sentence
of the Marcott abstract, «
Surface temperature reconstructions
of the past 1500 years suggest that recent
warming is
unprecedented in that time» Now when you dig through the paper and check the supplements you find that that statement is «not robust».
«Joshua, the first sentence
of the Marcott abstract, «
Surface temperature reconstructions
of the past 1500 years suggest that recent
warming is
unprecedented in that time»» Yes, it does.
Surface temperature reconstructions
of the past 1500 years suggest that recent
warming is
unprecedented in that time.