Interestingly, when applied to federal law, California Courts have held just the opposite: that «
unpublished federal decisions can be cited as persuasive but not precedential authority.»
Not exact matches
Legal Realism
Unpublished Decisions, Non-Citation Rules, and
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 Existing Legal Scholarship and Empirical Data A DETAILED COMPARISON OF PRINT AND ELECTRONIC RESEARCH PROCESSES — IDENTIFYING SALIENT DIFFERENCES Electronic Researchers Are Not Guided by Key System Information to the Same Extent as Print Researchers with Respect to Identifying Relevant Theories, Principles, and Cases Electronic Researchers Do Not Encounter and Interpret Individual Cases Through the Lens of Key System Information to the Same Extent as Print Researchers Electronic Researchers Are Exposed to More — and Different — Case Texts than Print Researchers COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY - DERIVED PREDICTIONS ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCES OF A CHANGED RESEARCH PROCESS: DIVERSITY IN FRAMING AND TILTING AT WINDMILLS Principles and Theories of Cognitive Psychology Influence of Labeling Influence of Categories Confirmatory Bias and Selective Information Processing Application of Cognitive Psychology Principles to Legal Research Diversity in Framing.
With NLP technology, ROSS can pinpoint answers to substantive legal issues in Labor & Employment Law, across
Federal and State courts, agencies and arbitration panels, including published and
unpublished decisions covering subjects such as:
Oil States appealed to the
Federal Circuit, which affirmed in an
unpublished decision.
A proposed amendment to the
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure would allow citation to unpublished, non-precedential decisions in briefs filed in all federal appellate
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure would allow citation to
unpublished, non-precedential
decisions in briefs filed in all
federal appellate
federal appellate courts.