High - Stakes Testing: Excessive reliance on standardized exams narrows the curriculum, promotes teaching to the test and leads to unfair and
unreliable evaluations of students, teachers and schools.
PAA opposes excessive reliance on standardized exams, which narrows the curriculum, promotes teaching to the test and leads to unfair and
unreliable evaluations of students, teachers and schools.
Not exact matches
The legal action taken by these seven Florida educators will undoubtedly add to the growing momentum against misguided accountability systems that rob
students of actual learning and tangle up teachers» performance
evaluations with
unreliable test scores.
There is a large body
of growing evidence, however, that suggests these
evaluation models are
unreliable at identifying teachers who are actually good at getting
students to learn the things they should be learning.
TCTA has consistently opposed attempts to tie teacher
evaluations to
student test scores based on the weight
of research showing that using
student test performance to evaluate teacher performance is invalid,
unreliable and unfair.
Most importantly, Dr. Darling - Hammond states that
evaluation should include evidence
of student learning but from sources other than standardized tests, and she rejects growth measures such as SGPs and Value - Added Models because
of the ever increasing research base that says they are
unreliable and create poor incentives in education.
Assessment experts say that the method
of using
student standardized scores to gauge a teacher's effectiveness is
unreliable, but reformers still insist on using this «value - added» method
of evaluation.