I think I speak for all family lawyers when I say it is our wish to deal with represented litigants because
unrepresented litigants often have the wrong view regarding lawyers in general and how lawyers are most often trying to «trick» or «bully» them.
Not exact matches
The fervor with which they pursue their claim (
often their life's sole focus,
often misconceived, and
often containing vexatious and extreme allegations against your client), and their lack of objectivity, significantly increase the costs of litigation for the defendant...» (Layperson vs. Lawyer: Dealing with
Unrepresented Litigants http://www.cle.bc.ca/onlinestore/productdetails.aspx?cid=1039) Hmmm... sound familiar?
For instance, in their dealings with self - represented
litigants, opposing lawyers can and
often do take advantage of the
unrepresented parties» insecurity over, and ignorance of, court rules and procedures.
One can understand the frustration of judges when bundles are badly prepared / late / missing, but save in the most affluent of cases the preparation of bundles will
often be onerous and time - consuming particularly in cases involving
litigants in person (where the respondent, if legally represented, now has to prepare the bundle if the applicant is
unrepresented).
By: Alena Storton PDF Version: Supporting the
Unrepresented: Providing Trial Information to Self - Represented
Litigants Case Commented On: R v Hamiane, 2016 ABQB 409 (CanLII) Recent appeals by self - represented litigants (SRL) often focus on the extent of a trial judge's duty to... Continue
Litigants Case Commented On: R v Hamiane, 2016 ABQB 409 (CanLII) Recent appeals by self - represented
litigants (SRL) often focus on the extent of a trial judge's duty to... Continue
litigants (SRL)
often focus on the extent of a trial judge's duty to... Continue reading →
The problem isn't the
unrepresented litigant but the court system and, to complete Lord Woolf's 1995 quote «its procedures which are still too
often inaccessible and incomprehensible to ordinary people».
Developed by CALI, in association with Chicago - Kent College of Law, this freely available tool permits the creation by legal aid attorneys, courts other of «self - guided A2J interviews for use by
unrepresented litigants and others in need -LSB-... that] walk users through a step - by - step question and answer process, which, in the end, creates an (
often otherwise confusing) legal form.»