[31] I have also considered whether, having arrived at the foregoing conclusion, I should defer dealing with the substance of the application
until after the appeal of the Mistrial Ruling.
Not exact matches
A federal
appeals court ruled in 2015 that the notice can't take place
until after biosimilar makers gain approval from the Food and Drug Administration.
Atleti will not be able to make any new signings
until 2018
after the Court of Arbitration for Sport rejected their
appeal, and so it appears as though Griezmann will show his loyalty and answer the call to stay for now, as he also showed on social media earlier this week that he remains committed to the cause.
After seeing the suspension overturned last year, it will be curious to see whether sportsbooks wait
until Brady's
appeal has concluded.
Warren told the BBC that the fight would be licensed by the Luxembourg boxing association
after Chisora's
appeal against his suspension was put back
until July.
Vacco said he submitted the invoice as new evidence because they didn't have it
until after he was legally required to respond to the
appeals.
An
appeal shouldn't be allowed to go forward
until after that more complete record is made, Ozanne said.
Li makes her way from county to city, enduring one trial
after another,
until she decides to make her
appeal in far - off Beijing, but 10 years go by, and the cases of Li's divorce and her ruined reputation have not been resolved.
The iPhone maker had hoped to postpone the hearings
until after it's had a chance to
appeal its guilty verdict.
I have learned this lesson the hard way, missing out on a stock that was falling, and the metrics looked good, but I bid a lower than market price thinking it was going to drop to my price, but then of course, it turned, and never looked back... being stubborn I did not raise my bid
until after it was no longer
appealing to me.
Kittens will pursue
appealing scents relentlessly
until they get what they are
after.
With respect to the award of interest, the Hamburg Court of
Appeal rejected a challenge to enforcement under article V (1)(c), made on the basis that the arbitral tribunal had awarded more interest than had been claimed, considering that an «arbitral tribunal can in its discretion and on its own initiative award interest and compound interest for the time
until the rendition of the award and for the time
after the rendition of the award.»
The decision of the Federal Court of
Appeal was not released
until April 13, 1983 some two weeks
after assent had been given to the amendments to the Act.
Clendening found the claim was statute - barred, as Gillis did not launch his claim
until Sept. 19, 2016, which was more than two years
after the Court of
Appeal delivered its decision in his case.
The government
appealed an offending judgment of the court, Al - Khawaja v UK, to the Grand Chamber of the European Court and then got it deferred
until after the domestic courts had decided Horncastle.
(correct test for Barrister
appeals; whether outside the ex improviso rule, prosecutor may call evidence
after prosecution and defence case closed; use of debarring orders against prosecutor; whether tribunal may «enter the arena» and strongly request the attendance of a prosecution witness; whether BSB has power to summons witnesses; whether prosecutor may communicate with disciplinary judge behind the back of the defence; whether such communication redolent of actual bias of judge where judge wishes prosecutor good luck on
appeal; whether apparent bias doctrine can be engaged by post-trial conduct of judge; legal effect of serving BSB prosecutions department officer being 1 of 4 appointing members of the COIC «Tribunals Appointments Body» (TAB); whether TAB ultra vires the Bar's Constitutions; whether open - ended power of removal of member of COIC pool without cause, unlawful given position of BSB Chair and senior staff on COIC; whether ECHR Article 6 guarantees against pressure on disciplinary judges to conform with a prosecutorial mentality; whether disciplinary judges Art. 6 «independent» within Findlay v United Kingdom given key role of BSB prosecutions department in appointing disciplinary judges; serious non-disclosure by BSB of notes of secret meeting between BSB and disciplinary judge
until day before
appeal and despite requests and application for disclosure by defence)
The British Columbia Court of
Appeal found that, as the police faced an «active, unfolding crime», their actions were appropriate (note: despite removing the Appellant's girlfriend, they did not conduct a search of Mr. Webster's apartment
until after they obtained a warrant).
suits; that these purchases were made in pursuance of the conspiracy, secretly and fraudulently, for the purpose of preventing the Toledo Company and the District Court of Northern Illinois and the Circuit Court of
Appeals of the Seventh Circuit from learning of the Phinney commercial practice; that the Toledo Company made diligent effort and investigation to find the Phinney commercial practice, and also evidence of the Computing Company's fraudulent suppression of evidence thereof; that, while Toledo Company had had knowledge of the Phinney commercial practice since 1913, it had no knowledge of Computing Company's fraudulent suppression thereof
until December 20, 1921, which was
after the affirmance of the accounting decree.
It was not
until 33 years later, on January 21, 1997, that Mr. Hinse was acquitted by the S.C.C.
after obtaining an extension of the time for
appealing his conviction.
Cases begun before 1949 were still allowed to
appeal after 1949 and the final case to make it to the Council was not
until 1959 with the case of Ponoka - Calmar Oils v. Wakefield, [1960] A.C. 18.
8.12.3 Provided the Registrar and the other parties have been notified in writing, an application by an appellant for public funding or legal aid suspends the commencement of proceedings and the time limits in rules 11 and 19 are extended
until 28 days
after the determination of the application for public funding or legal aid (including any
appeals against a refusal of funding).
109 A writ for a new election shall not be issued
until after the expiration of the time limited for
appeal from the determination of the Superior Court of Justice that the election is void and, if an
appeal is brought, the writ shall not issue pending the
appeal.
The
Appeals court found that it wasn't
until after the plaintiff filed her initial complaint, and during the course of discovery, that the plaintiff discovered the hospital had a «Termination of Cervical Spine Immobilization» policy, which stated that only doctors were to remove cervical spine collars.
Although the Ontario government commissioned a report and drafted legislation to address the status of paralegals, no legislative reform occurred
until after the Ontario Court of
Appeal raised the matter again in 1999 and explicitly chastised the government for failing to take any action to regulate paralegals.
After a successful career at the Chancery Bar, he sat on the Chancery Division bench for 13 years
until his elevation to the Court of
Appeal in 2007.
The court decided to delay the consideration of the amount of these damages, however,
until after the completion of
appeals in the case.
(1) Should the order requiring that the NOT be changed be stayed
until after disposition of the
appeal?
Scherer overturned Rebollo's decision before prosecutors
appealed it, they argued — the state did not ask for access to the documents
until after Scherer «advocated» for it,» Cuddihy and Finkelstein said.
If documents produced become an exhibit in the proceedings they will not be returned to the producing party
until at least 28 days
after the hearing or an
appeal but must be returned no later than 42 days (unless written permission has been given to destroy the documents)
The trial court and later the
appeals court rejected the argument, stating that the sellers had no need to inform the buyers about the possibility of an assessment, especially since the county agency hadn't decided on the sewer assessment
until after the closing.