"Unwelcome conduct" refers to behavior or actions that are not wanted, accepted, or appreciated by someone. It is behavior that makes someone feel uncomfortable, upset, or violated.
Full definition
... I am of the view that sexual harassment in the workplace may be broadly defined as
unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature that detrimentally affects the work environment or leads to adverse job - related consequences for the victims of the harassment.
In an email, an LSO spokesman said that the law society already has several programs in place to address harassment and discrimination but that the survey responses make it clear that too many articling students are still
experiencing unwelcome conduct.
«However an employer would be entitled to discipline someone for subjecting (as in this case) a junior colleague to unwanted pressure and
unwelcome conduct by foisting their religion on them.
Victim employees should not be required to defend their dignity and self respect or to resist or turn away
from unwelcome conduct, approaches or comments of a sexual nature by another employee.
Employers can take away from this case the need for company policies that deal with personal relationships with co-workers, sexual harassment and
unwelcome conduct between employees, including the complaint, response and investigations process.
BU's policy defines sexual harassment as «
unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature that has the effect of creating a hostile or stressful living, learning, or working environment.»
As well, in a January 26, 2018 Globe and Mail article we are told that a recent internal survey conducted by the Law Society found «that nearly one in five current and recent articling students said they had
experienced unwelcome conduct or comments, based on their gender, sexual orientation, national origin, disability or other personal characteristics.
Under federal civil rights laws, harassment is
unwelcome conduct based on a protected class (race, national origin, color, sex, age, disability, religion) that is severe, pervasive, or persistent and creates a hostile environment.
Schools bear responsibility for investigating «
any unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature.»
Harassment, on the other hand, is
unwelcome conduct that is discriminatory or sexual in nature.
Such insults can amount to discrimination regarding employment if the wrongdoer is clothed by the employer with such authority that he or she is able to impose
that unwelcome conduct on the complainant as a condition of employment, or if the wrongdoing is tolerated by the employer.
Judge Eady QC dismissed the appeal, stating in her judgment that: «The claimant was not subjected to disciplinary process or sanction because she manifested her religious belief in voluntary and consensual exchanges with a colleague but because — as the employment tribunal expressly found — she subjected a subordinate to unwanted and
unwelcome conduct, going substantially beyond «religious discussion», without regard to her own influential position.
Bill 30 defines «harassment» to mean any single incident or repeated incidents of objectionable or
unwelcome conduct, comment, bullying or action by a person that the person knows or ought reasonably to know will or would cause offence or humiliation to a worker, or adversely affects the worker's health and safety, and includes:
I can not say that her failure to report
the unwelcome conduct of Mr. Comeau was in breach of the employment contract or should act to nullify or reduce the veracity of her claim in any way.
The employer defended the action in part on the basis that the employee failed to report the supervisor's
unwelcome conduct.
Harassment under Title VII is
unwelcome conduct that is based on one or more of the enumerated protected characteristics.
Previously, harassment or
unwelcome conduct was defined as being connected with an individual's sex.
«
Unwelcome conduct» should not be treated any differently because that conduct was perpetuated by a customer (ibid.)
~ Insults inflicted upon employees in the workplace, even in the course of their employment, only fall under s. 13 of the Human Rights Code if the wrongdoer has sufficient employer - given power to impose
the unwelcome conduct as a condition of employment, or if the conduct is tolerated... [more]
~ Insults inflicted upon employees in the workplace, even in the course of their employment, only fall under s. 13 of the Human Rights Code if the wrongdoer has sufficient employer - given power to impose
the unwelcome conduct as a condition of employment, or if the conduct is tolerated by the employer.