Few issues get travelers more worked
up than the debate over how airlines should handle children.
Not exact matches
Rather
than pay
up, Uber got into a lengthy
debate with the state in which Anthony Levandowski, vice president at Uber's Advanced Technologies Group (and founder of the self - driving startup Otto that Uber acquired) argued Uber wasn't actually testing «autonomous vehicles» because all its vehicles had human drivers aboard and would for the foreseeable future.
If you listen to the latest buzz, House Republicans are now thinking of triggering a crisis over the debt - ceiling
debate, likely coming
up in late October, rather
than the federal budget.
The exact size and growth of this workforce is
debated, but workers employed under precarious work conditions make
up a significant portion of the larger workforce, with estimates that 4 out of every 10 workers are now employed in precarious situations.49 These workers typically face higher income volatility
than workers in traditional employment relationships because they spend more time unemployed or underemployed and some have low earnings.50
And the only reason solar customers» electricity rates are even
up for
debate is that the installation cap under the old rate was hit last week, six months earlier
than the utility estimated.
Although there is some
debate as to whether the top - down approach is better
than the bottom -
up approach, many investors have found the top - down approach useful in determining the most promising sectors in a given market.
- I am better
than you, that isn't
up for
debate.
The big lesson of this cycle's
debates: Stop underestimating the intelligence of the American public - Looking at the post-
debate polls, the Romney that showed
up at the
debate made a much better impression
than the «humanized» Romney of the Republican convention.
He clearly bested Al Gore in the
debates in 2000, though this was more the result of Gore's own implosion
than Bush's skill; and he held his own against John Kerry, whom the liberal media had built
up as an intellectual giant.
The general consensus of the day is that Governor Mitt Romney showed
up far more prepared
than anyone expected and President Barack Obama's generally reliable polish was mysteriously absent in Wednesday night's first presidential
debate.
If I had decided to chime in I would have recommended reading Ian Bradley's fine book Abide With Me: The World of Victorian Hymns (1997), where he details the heated
debates in 19th century England over whether to have choirs, and if so, if they should be kept at the rear of the sanctuary in order to «back
up» the congregation in its worship rather
than being a visual distraction in the front.
If we do have an understanding of the conversation then the definitions of these «packed» concepts are subjective and we wind
up debating terms like «following Jesus» which means something entirely different to me
than it did to my 92 year old grandmother.
its an issue that of course is
up for
debate like any other, but for some reason it has more emotive power
than most others too — why is that?
The
debate was wound
up by the high priest Caiaphas, who stated the case bluntly as he saw it: «It is more to your interest that one man should die for the people
than that the whole nation should be destroyed.»
One thesis, offered by more
than one writer, rests on the claim that Lewis gave
up entirely his interest in reasoned apologetics after a 1948
debate with Elizabeth Anscombe at a meeting of the Oxford Socratic Club.
I believe, on the contrary, that it is a matter of the greatest importance to make clear the true implications of the negation of sexual difference and to
debate publicly what is at stake rather
than falling back on principles, such as equality, that flatter those who set themselves
up as their standard bearers, even though the way these principles are invoked to justify the homosexual - marriage agenda does not stand
up to critical scrutiny.
Now, more
than ever, we need you to stay loud, as political
debate about live export intensifies in the lead
up to the election.
Its health benefits are
up to
debate but I like using it more
than vegetable oils or olive oil.
I would say that Xhaka is more of a deep lying playmaker
than a DM, I would like to see a CM partner for him who will put themselves about and put their foot in for the tackle, I think Coquelin has done better at this in pre season although if he and Xhaka can form a partnership is still
up for
debate.
These players seem stuck in limbo at Arsenal and so it remains
up for
debate if firstly whether Smit is any better
than these guys of if not and whether he will just join them rotting in the reserves or out on loan?
this
debate is embarrassing guys I want wenger out I believe his time is
up but not now its our time as the fans to rally the boys lets gve the boys heart I don't like how us fans r showing our discontent if I was around wenger we could've already brawled but now more
than ever the players need us... sacking someone now is out of the equation it will spell all doom and we might miss out top four coz as it is the players r down....
I thought people here were
debating about two or three seasons back why he should be our top striker.When I thought the Monaco match was the icing on the cake to show how average he was it seems just like Wenger we» will never learn our lesson.Now people our okay with him being a super sub which is debatable.Giroud was a super sub in games last season because he wasn't played when he was supposed to.He's not your ideal super sub because he very hardly creates but rather requires people to create for him.Most of the time super subs are the one's who tend to create the chances and open
up spaces in the opposition defence.West ham are ready to pay and hence we should demand more from them.We can then use the money from his sale on far better players.Given the same seasons, time and chances a lot of average strikers can do better
than what he did.This is because Arsenal create a lot of chances and it just needs someone who can finish.Goodbye!.
My word Flamini?should there even be a
debate as to why he should be leaving?He does not even deserve to be back.Looking at his output he should be earning less
than what he earns.He might do well in one out of thousand matches but he is very poor.He should leave his place should be taken
up by a more effective player.He is inconsistent and no inconsistent backups are allowed.We want to win major trophies and i think we can do without Flamini.
I honestly don't know why time and energy are being spent offering and
debating such a bill, other
than (a) to make Thom Tillis and the other GOP backers look good and reasonable without real consequence for doing so, and (b) to maybe lock in the GOP to setting
up such a select committee / reappointing Mueller before it becomes necessary to do so.
(whether that was a Kirk thing, a Brian thing, or a James Butler injury thing is worthy of
debate) Look no further
than his receptions dropping off precipitously despite his carries going
up > 50 %.
I am
up for
debate, but on his worst day would be no lower
than # 2.
Jesse seems to understand José's tactics better
than Martial and Rashford, if he was more clinical in taking his chances I do nt think his selection would be
up for
debate.
This post is not my attempt to answer that question, but rather a look at what constitutes a tackle won or a tackle lost, because this is one aspect of the Lucas
debate that regularly gets brought
up, as he attempts more tackles
than any other player in the Premier League.
Sometimes I think that parenting back in ancient times must have been simultaneously harder and easier
than it is now, mostly because there was a prescribed way to do things back then; no
debate over organic veggies, screen time, or how fucked
up your kid was going to turn out if you put them on a naughty step.
Ezzo went on to write that, «ladies, I do have other more important activities to fill
up my day,
than the go nowhere
debates with emotionally charged demand feeding mothers talking about demand feeding practices.»
But, but formula becoming Rx, insurance would pick
up some or all of the cost, which would actually save parents more money
than the coupons (in most cases; again, not
debating healthcare here).
In next Fall's online
debates, Yahoo gets good PR by being all nice and public service - y, Huffington Post can try to build
up legitimacy as something other
than a partisan organ, and Slate can get in front of more eyeballs
than those belonging to its usual smarty - pants readers.
But in reality I don't see the merits of opening the
debate about them because you run the risk of further intimidating the victims, and may ending
up regarding one type as more serious
than another.
The same could be surmised from the conduct and discourse of the Committee Chair himself, who recently chose to start
up a «lively and passionate public
debate» on codification on the academic blog of the United Kingdom Constitutional Law Association — hardly likely to be read by any «public» other
than public law academics.
-LSB-...] In a
debate on this issue at Liberal Conspiracy, James Graham sums
up my opinion better
than I have done: I feel Sunder's pain, but the problem -LSB-...]
Conservative MP Robin Walker is mistaken to think that voting systems other
than first - past - the - post all give a leg -
up to extremist parties (electoral system
debate, TP, Nov).
With the newspapers full of allegations of a cover -
up at the Care Quality Commission over care at Morecambe Bay, the public may be less sympathetic to doctors» leaders
than they were when
debate centred on NHS reform.
Leaving aside the
debate about just how much influence Britain has within the EU anyway, would a Brexit really result in a diminution of power greater
than the end of empire, or that which states like Greece gave
up when they joined the Euro, or when Poland chose paralysis as its political system in the eighteenth century, leading to it disappearing from the map altogether for well over a century?
TechPresident's Micah Sifry was a little skeptical of how transformative the
debate format will be, since citizens have been asking questions of candidates in townhall - style
debates for years, but the organizers believe that opening the process
up to more people
than just those selected to be in a single auditorium WILL make a significant difference.
The TV
debates during next year's general election look set to end
up in a» 5 -3-2 formation», rather
than being restricted to just the three main party leaders.
Two polls in upstate Congressional Districts conducted just before the primary showed Hawkins at 12 % — higher
than third party candidate Jessie Ventura was when he was allowed to
debate and ended
up being elected Governor of Minnesota.
It appears Bercow is now, more
than ever, granting Labour spurious SO24
debates, Points of Order and even advising them on how to use arcane parliamentary procedures to whack the government, in an attempt to shore
up the support he needs on the Labour benches.
Framing the
debate in these terms would be the best way of engaging Germany on this issue; even the staunchly pro-EU foreign minister Guido Westerwelle recently argued that «The EU can not spend more
than up until now.
Possibly riding high on the relief — rather
than out - and - out joy — of winning an important symbolic vote this morning when a motion was put to the conference hall on continuing the coalition's economic policies was carried, a
debate where the Lib Dem leader himself summed
up, he continued to push coalition strength and struggle over capitulating to his party's leftwing.
Nothing more pitiful
than a delirious republican who makes
up ridiculous and crazy comparisons b / c he can't
debate me or anyone else on the facts about Iraq.
Rather
than allow the setting
up of this talking shop on the nod, the Tories opted to oppose the motion and a
debate (some might say filibuster) ensued for a whole hour, which saw contributions from Tory MPs from across the nation and regular interventions from the Speaker to keep them to the strict terms of the
debate.
More
than 58 million people watched the
debate —
up from the 52.4 million viewers who tuned in for the first
debate of the 2008 presidential campaign.
Team Astorino buried the lede earlier today in its Putin - better - on -
debating -
than - Cuomo news release: The Republican's gubernatorial campaign has agreed «tentatively» to one televised
debate in Buffalo that the Cuomo campaign signed
up for late last month.
According to Momentum, the festival will feature more
than 160 hours of workshops,
debates, live music, art exhibitions, children's activities, plays, and parties, including a «political games corner», interactive art exhibitions, pop
up think tanks run by various groups including «Mums for Corbyn», a four day Hackathon tasked with building the tools needed to win the next election, workshops on how to make a viral video, a play telling the stories of striking miners and live streams of the Labour Party Conference.
With less
than 90 minutes before the
debate was set to begin on the next governor, former U.S. Rep. Rob Simmons said he still had not made
up his mind on whom he will support.