It's
up to individual judges to determine if expenses are unique or extraordinary.
Other counties are leaving
it up to individual judges.
Their application to a specific situation is
up to an individual judge's «discretion» based on the unique set of facts before the court.
States have statutory lists of factors that courts consider to determine what is in the best interests of the child, but it's
up to an individual judge to interpret them on a case - by - case basis.
Not exact matches
We do need
judges with the gusto
to stand
up to individuals such as these!
In my experience, the issue is not an anti-christian world, but a sense that certain
individual «Christians» such as yourself, as well as some various religious denominations claiming
to be Christian, have set themselves
up as
judges of all humanity.
Then show me the part where it says it's totally
up to individual people
to judge everybody else for what they perceive is wrong.
The pastoral role is concerned with ministry
to individuals; the priestly role has
to do with the proclamation of the faith and with leadership in the liturgical life of the church; the prophetic role focuses on
judging the level of humaneness in the social order and pointing
to the changes required if common justice is
to be approximated; the kingly role takes
up governance and the expression of neighbor love through responsible corporate action.
To judge by the content of these books, church signs are more likely to strive for humor than ones put up by individual
To judge by the content of these books, church signs are more likely
to strive for humor than ones put up by individual
to strive for humor than ones put
up by
individuals.
I did address the
judging others... its
up to the
individual really... if they dress soppily (intentionally) are they really being sincere?
Now when the guilty are so numerous it is not humanly possible
to do this, therefore one must give the whole thing
up, one perceives that there can be no question of any judgment, they are too numerous
to be
judged, one can not make them or in any way manage
to make them
individuals, so one must give
up holding judgment.
Each award category has an
individual committee made
up of industry professionals who volunteer their time
to oversee the policies, procedures, and selection of
judges for their respective Awards program.
This is simple a very intelligent child can solve this problem.Firstly today our keeper was very poor however i know he will come good.By the way why is Paulista no getting his chance.What i have observed about arsenal since we signed Mertesacker from day one and since he started playing is that Mertesacker hardly gets involved you will usually see him a few times because he does not want
to get caught out.e has always been a weak link in the defence even in his greatest performances here.When i see us playing with a high line and he is there i always laugh.It is just a mistake waiting
to happen and i can tell u that it will happen again this season.Secondly why is Ramsey Cazorla and Ozil playing in the same line -
up in a 4 -5-1 formation.That is just not right though it will win you some matches due
to individual brilliance.It wont work at all.Lastly the least i say about Giroud the better i am not
judging him on one game.One would imagine if he was not french and like chinese will he be getting these chances under Wenger.
To me he will always be an average player and i will stand by my word even if he has good games.
«A very senior
judge must hear it and it would be possible
to reach a conclusion
to what was done firstly without naming agents or officers; secondly
to establish whether it was
individuals or policies at fault; and thirdly so that guidelines for how
to proceed can be drawn
up.»
This means that any extension would not only be: - subject
to a specific case being made by the Director of Public Prosecutions; - subject every seven days
up to the agreed limit
to the approval of a High Court
Judge; - subject
to the regular report of the independent reviewer with an annual debate in parliament; - but also be subject in each and every instance
to a specific parliamentary notification procedure,
to a further statement
to parliament on the
individual case, a review on the specific case by the independent reviewer and with the provision for this House
to scrutinise and debate the report and all the circumstances.
Jane Wade MCIOB, chair of the residential projects
up to 6 storeys category, says that the
judges» task is
to focus on the achievements of the
individual, and not be swayed by the glamour of a finished structure.
Tommy Wiseau may be a terrible filmmaker (and
judging from his terrible movie, some kind of misogynist), he may be ill - tempered and unprofessional, he may be a genuinely troubled or tortured
individual, and he may be too shady
to offer
up details about himself as basic as his age... but, the filmmakers counter, we really like the bad movie he made!
Ridges along the edge of each button and well
judged gaps are the key
to this, making it a breeze
to locate each
individual button, while comparatively high pressure requirements ensure that you don't end
up pressing the wrong one in the heat of battle.
But one theme that cropped
up repeatedly in the shortlisting discussion of the
judging panel for the 2014 Art Fund Prize for Museum of the Year was the very evident impact of particular
individuals (be they curators or directors) on the quality and originality of what was being newly presented
to the visiting public.
What reasonably intelligent
individual, particularly a
Judge, wants
to deliver the plaintiffs their glorious victory here and virtually say
to Americans, that's it folks, no more gasoline for you as the Oilcos have
to shut
up shop.
According
to Felder's dissent, the
judge was a «decent, humble dedicated
individual who is well - liked and respected» and who «built an exemplary career in public service» after growing
up in public housing.
Ultimately it is
up to the
judge to determine how great the incident has affected an
individual financially.
Accused went
to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended
up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns
to body — Trial
judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced
to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered
to provide DNA sample pursuant
to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against sentence was allowed — Trial
judge erred in concluding that discharge was not appropriate in circumstances, especially given conclusion that accused did not deliberately attempt
to injure victim — Trial
judge found that there was no need for either specific deterrence or general deterrence; prime concern was need for denunciation of her conduct — Section 730 of Criminal Code permits discharge in cases of this nature, provided that it was in best interest of accused and not contrary
to public interest — Accused was responsible
individual with no record whatsoever, she held position as counsellor and social worker for 25 years — Trial
judge did not find that conviction would definitely affect her employment, but possibility existed, and such conviction would necessarily result in criminal record — There was no likelihood of re-offending — Conditional discharge would not be contrary
to public interest.
Maryland caselaw allows the trial
judge to run that entire jury questioning show, except that Maryland
judges often will permit the parties
to ask some follow -
up questions
to individual potential jurors.
As a District and Circuit
Judge,
Judge Sotomayor has enforced the rights of all
individuals to be free from discrimination in the workplace,
to be paid wages that they have earned,
to receive benefits
to which they are entitled, and
to be free from retaliation for standing
up for their rights.
In July 2007, a B.C. Supreme Court
judge accused Palkowski of orchestrating a «sham» bail scheme for Gilliland, when a friend Thomas Ryan agreed
to put
up the money and it was split among three
individuals who did not know Gilliland or Ryan.
«It limits our flexibility and that of prosecutors and
judges in coming
up with mutually satisfactory resolutions and many
individual defendants are more likely
to choose
to fight.
The other challenge is how
to judge the wellbeing of the
individual in terms of a medical check -
up.
That is because you are being
judged for a position which is responsible for another
individual's well - being, and you have
to prove that you're
up to it.
Eventually Michelle decided that she was ready
to open
up to an
individual therapist, even though she was terrified of being
judged and rejected.
We provide a safe and secure environment that allows
individuals to open
up and talk honestly without the fear of being
judged.