Sentences with phrase «up to the interpretation of»

At the end of the day it's up to your interpretation of what a caveman would have eaten, and whether or not they would have sought out beans, chickpeas, and peanuts, or if they would have taken a pass on them.

Unfortunately, there are only three different endings and all of still are all left up to your interpretation of what is going on.

Not exact matches

China president Xi Jinping is expected to present «the most authoritative interpretation» on China's 40 years of economic reforms and opening up as part of h's keynote speech, as well as announce the establishment of free - trade ports in Chinese provinces potentially including Hainan.

According to Pyongyang's interpretation of the idea, it will only give up nuclear weapons if Washington meets certain conditions, which includes removing American troops from South Korea.

Chinese president Xi Jinping is set to deliver a keynote speech Tuesday (April 10) at this year's gathering, in which he will give «the most authoritative interpretation» on China's 40 years of economic reforms and opening up,

Tesla Model Y rendered to life from Photoshopped teaser image Graphic artist Jan Peisert of Peisert Design dreamed up his own interpretation of the...

Given the uncertainties of interpretation, it seems unwise to put too much emphasis on changes in employment over short periods; viewed over the past year, employment has been sluggish, and does not appear to have accelerated further since the initial pick - up in the September quarter 1996.

We can sum up the Fed's monetary statement and rate decision in four words, although the initial reaction of the markets points to a dovish interpretation by the «algos» and traders alike.

Indeed, the proper interpretation of the Phillips Curve is one that relates the rate of unemployment to the rate of real wage inflation, not general price inflation (see Will the Real Phillips Curve Please Stand Up?

For example, I've seen a lot of «man was created in God's image» interpretations to help you think you've validated your position, but I can clear that one up for you right now.

Come on, I have had debates with Atheist but I have also had to pretty much break up potential fights between two persons of Faith over an interpretation of a scripture.

I love how you come up with this stuff... this «us» and «them» categories to justify your interpretation of the bible... dude... me and you are in the same boat here with interpretation... so quit living in da Nile.

I'm really amazed at the response of the «Christians» to this, this cant be the right interpretation, so attack the messenger, good thing they weren't around when Jesus showed up!!!!

After reading several of the posts on the «interpretation of mythical texts into a book called the bible» one is left to wonder how a being who is supposed to have created the universe would permit what is often referred to as «his inerrant words»... to get so screwed up... you would think he / she / it would have been keeping a close eye on a book that he / she / it wanted to have in print for... mass distribution... it is not not a womder the bible is messed up the way it is... it is a «human» construct... only humans could mess a book up that badly... gods do nor make mistakes... except for Rick Santorum

If you disagree with my interpretation (and it is sincerely how I interpet the text), ask yourself how it is that your «god» couldn't come up with a better way to communicate than a book that is so readily subject to so many interpretations and to being taken «out of context», and has so many mistakes in it.

They do NOT want their bizarre interpretation of christianity held up next to anyone elses.

Whitehead's oft - quoted statement, for example, that actual entities «are the final real things of which the world is made up» (PR 18/27; italics mine) is certainly open to double interpretation.

There are plenty of other places to go where you will get the interpretation you want to hear and plenty of theologians who will back you up.

It just goes to show how careless the translations are of this book and how it is all just up to interpretation.

Hence, only the first interpretation is meaningful, and it can not be used to deduce from the existence of (genuine) moral evil the nonexistence of benevolent omnipotence, since «whether the free men created by God would always do what is right would presumably be up to them» (GPE 271).

From my read of Brian's last comment, he admitted that some things were not handled as well as they could have been, but his interpretation of the evidence available does not add up to the claims posited by Julie.

Lutek, Yes, we tend to come up with what we think is the literal meaning of the Bible, then place our interpretation on others like a bag of rocks on their back that we think they should carry.

A Resurrection of his physical body, such as is implied by the empty tomb and by some of the stories in the Gospels of his appearances, would point towards a docetic Christ who does not fully share the lot of men; unless, indeed, bodily corruption were to be regarded as being bound up with the sinfulness of man which Christ did not share (but, unless we accept an impossibly literalistic interpretation of Genesis 3 as factual history, it is impossible to hold that physical dissolution is not part of the Creator's original and constant intention for his creatures in this world).

There are minor differences from country to country in the manner of praying, differences of no importance which have grown up through varying interpretations in the schools of jurisprudence.

Considering the subject of the film is more or less an interpretation of Scripture on the big screen, Paul earning $ 12 million is not only surprising, but perhaps another future signpost for Hollywood to sit up and take note.

A non-religious interpretation would call men to participate in the suffering of God in his life of the world,» not in the first place thinking about one's own needs, problems, sins and fears, but allowing oneself to be caught up into the way of Jesus Christ, into the messianic event, thus fulfilling Isa.

My favorite example of mixed metaphors in church is the one in which the pastor, after a laborious explanation of what a modern interpretation of girding one's loins might be and why, shouted that we all, needed to lift up our skirts and let Jesus go all the way.

In late October, Richard Burridge, dean of King's College London and professor of biblical interpretation there, was the first non — Roman Catholic to receive the prestigious Ratzinger Prize, set up as a kind of Nobel Prize for Theology.

As I've said many times before, I'm not particularly interested in converting young earth creationists into evolutionary creationists.I believe that Christians should be able to fellowship together in love and unity regardless of their various positions on the interpretation of Genesis Being neither an Old Testament scholar nor a scientist, I'll leave that debate up to the experts.

Either every word of the bible is to be taken literally or its entirety is up for interpretation.

To sum up, great as the structure of the interpretation of love is in St. Augustine, it exposes a discrepancy between the reality of the loving and acting God and the metaphysical vision of perfect completion and impassibility.

While some denominational leaders will continue to present a hyper - literal interpretation of Genesis 1 as non-negotiable Christian truth, organizations like The Biologos Forum will pick up steam as thoughtful, earnest Christians try to reconcile their faith with Darwin's theory of evolution.

The judge's ruling opening the elections back up comes in response to a suit filed by a group of nine 17 - year - olds, who disputed the interpretation.

To the first poster, if you took the time to write utter rubbish regarding separation of state, maybe you can take the time to learn what the founding fathers set it up for, it certainly wasn't for your interpretation of iTo the first poster, if you took the time to write utter rubbish regarding separation of state, maybe you can take the time to learn what the founding fathers set it up for, it certainly wasn't for your interpretation of ito write utter rubbish regarding separation of state, maybe you can take the time to learn what the founding fathers set it up for, it certainly wasn't for your interpretation of ito learn what the founding fathers set it up for, it certainly wasn't for your interpretation of it.

Lightfoot (1658) summed the need of one seeking true understanding (and not interpretation) up well: «For, first, when all the books of the New Testament were written by Jews, and among Jews, and unto them; and when all the discourses made there, were made in like manner by Jews, and to Jews, and among them; I was always fully persuaded, as of a thing past all doubting, that that Testament could not but everywhere taste of and retain the Jews» style, idiom, form, and rule of speaking.»

While people felt that it was in principle necessary to clear up the issue of interpretation, they felt that it was really a side issue.

Those are still left up to your own interpretation — I think all of us look at our own personal existance and go, «Whoa!».

Mays raises an interesting hermeneutical issue when he admits that his interpretation of Whitehead's metaphysics as a search for a logical structure of utmost generality may be said to be «largely circumstantial, based upon attempts to set up correspondences between different parts of his writings» (PW 94/98).

The only «way out» is to state in some fashion that the bible is not literally true, which opens up the «word of God» to human interpretation, I personally think that's perfectly rational, but I'm guessing most fundamentalists would disagree.

The Reformers had to defend their own interpretation of the Bible, Gadamer noted, and were up against Catholic theologians who appealed to the indispensability of tradition.

Though my interpretation of that statement by Jesus in the garden is somewhat controversial, it seems to make the most sense out of the context, and Jesus» attitude leading up to the cross.

But he is going to teach us all how to receive his warped interpretation of a man who had dedicated his life to lifting up the poor.

When Protestant literalism and enlightenment rationalism became dominant in the late 18th and 19th centuries, typological interpretation was taken up covertly by the novelists and poets or began to operate at unconscious or semiconscious levels of popular culture and ideology.

Once one has given up as incredible and impossible (save for mythological purposes) the Greek idea of a god who comes down to earth and walks about as a human being, there are two possibilities open for the interpretation of Jesus Christ.

This capacity to learn from experience in man, as in other animals, is primarily bound up with the interpretation of signals and with the ability to bring past experience to bear on present interpretation.

It is an interpretation of «experience» that applies up and down the line from protons to people.

Joseph used his gift of dream interpretation and his influence to provide for his family and to set them up to live comfortable lives.

Christian takes creativity to be the flame for a general fact, namely that the universe is made up of novel concrescences» (in Interpretation, op.

We need to discover what the images meant originally, within the life situation of the speaker and the hearers, and this opens up the possibility of interpretation for our own day.

I believe every word of the bible must be taken literally, except «Thou shalt not kill» which is up to interpretation.