Not exact matches
in a case in which a witness's identification of the
defendant is at issue, and the identifying witness and
defendant appear to be of different races, a trial court is required to give,
upon request, during final instructions, a jury charge on the cross-race effect, instructing (1) that the jury should consider whether there is a difference in race between the
defendant and the witness
who identified the
defendant, and (2) that, if so, the jury should consider (a) that some people have greater difficulty in accurately identifying members of different race than in accurately identifying members of their own race and (b) whether the difference in race affected the accuracy of the witness's identification.
A civil claim against the
defendant can be brought by the estate of the deceased and / or by those
who depended
upon the deceased for either financial assistance or services.
Held: The Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments require that no indigent criminal
defendant be sentenced to a term of imprisonment unless the State has afforded him the right to assistance of appointed counsel in his defense, but do not require a state trial court to appoint counsel for a criminal
defendant, such as petitioner,
who is charged with a statutory offense for which imprisonment
upon conviction is authorized but not imposed.
In our view, the Constitution's Due Process Clause forbids a State to use a punitive damages award to punish a
defendant for injury that it inflicts
upon nonparties or those whom they directly represent, i.e., injury that it inflicts
upon those
who are, essentially, strangers to the litigation.
The Court of Appeal ruled that in civil proceedings, the burden of proving self - defence lay
upon the
defendant; and a
defendant who had mistakenly but honestly thought it was necessary to defend himself against an imminent risk of attack could not rely on self - defence if his mistaken belief had not been reasonable.
This concerned the
Defendant who brought a Case Planning Conference and obtained an order requiring the Plaintiff to «notify counsel for the defendant of the name of the neurologist with whom the appointment had been made and the date of the appointment, and secondly, that the parties were to provide opposing counsel with written notice forthwith upon any appointment being set for the plaintiff with medical experts, such notice to include the name of the expert, the expertise of the expert, and the date of the appoin
Defendant who brought a Case Planning Conference and obtained an order requiring the Plaintiff to «notify counsel for the
defendant of the name of the neurologist with whom the appointment had been made and the date of the appointment, and secondly, that the parties were to provide opposing counsel with written notice forthwith upon any appointment being set for the plaintiff with medical experts, such notice to include the name of the expert, the expertise of the expert, and the date of the appoin
defendant of the name of the neurologist with whom the appointment had been made and the date of the appointment, and secondly, that the parties were to provide opposing counsel with written notice forthwith
upon any appointment being set for the plaintiff with medical experts, such notice to include the name of the expert, the expertise of the expert, and the date of the appointment ``.
Eastern Consolidated Properties, Inc. v. Lucas (285 A.D. 2d 421)- Supreme Court's order to dismiss broker's complaint reversed; broker's complaint sufficiently alleges that certain
defendants have the authority to act on behalf of all
defendants in the underlying real estate transaction;
upon procuring a buyer ready, willing and able to purchase on the seller's terms, the broker has earned its commission and a seller
who frustrates the consummation of the transaction is liable nonetheless to the broker; no requirement that a brokerage commission be in writing (GOL 5 - 710 [a][10]-RRB-