Sentences with phrase «upon a marriage of»

When parents in a society with race lines look with apprehension upon the marriage of their child to a person of a different race, they have in view the indignities and disabilities which the unjust society will visit upon the couple and upon their children and their children's children.

After tasting this awesome balsamic and going through several different ideas for a recipe, I lit upon the marriage of Soni's roasted fennel with the cranberry balsamic and thus this Roasted Fennel Salad with Cranberry Balsamic was born.

The W.F.P. was founded in 1998 upon a marriage of labor unions, like McGuire's group, and activist organizing groups like Citizen Action.

(2) An order with respect to the maintenance of a party to a de facto relationship in accordance with this Division ceases to have effect upon the marriage of the party unless in special circumstances a court having jurisdiction under this Act otherwise orders.

Lots of times doing business is as much contingent upon a marriage of personalities as it is about business structure per se.

Not exact matches

The Christian understanding of marriage rests upon a whole complex of other doctrines, from creation to Christology to anthropology to eschatology.

All I can say to African Americans who oppose gay marriage is that once upon a time, much of America opposed you.

I will say, though, that no «fundamentalist» Mormon would sanction the marriages you're referencing, which stand in direct opposition to the principles of their Church, which absolutely insists upon upholding the law of the land.

All other Church are corrupt and either lost the Priesthood authority thru corruption (think Catholic) or never had it, but took it upon themselves to administer the audiences of the Gospel as in baptism, marriages ect...

When I learned the law of head - covering at a Jerusalem seminary for women, I was horrified that I would have to bind up my head upon marriage; all clothing was a concession, and I conceded as little as permissible.

The archbishop also asserted that laws are based upon certain principles: «the pursuit of the common good through respect for the natural law, the dignity of the human person, the inviolability of innocent life from conception to natural death, the sanctity of marriage, justice for the poor, protection of minors, and so on.»

But you had to read over to the jump page before you knew that some family experts (two are cited) may be quite concerned about the implicit de-emphasis upon childrearing and what it tells us about the state of American marriage and family life.

As Fiorenza has observed, «Paul's advice to remain free from the marriage bond was a frontal assault upon the institutions of existing law and the general cultural ethos, especially since it was given to a people who lived in the urban centres of the Roman Empire.»

Imputation is described tersely and truly by an English historian of the Reformation, Patrick Collinson: «[It is] a transaction somewhat like a marriage, in which Christ the bridegroom takes to himself an impoverished and wretched harlot and confers upon her all the riches that are His....

«Those who believed that Pope Francis's pastoral revolution presaged a doctrinal change in terms of marriage and family heaved a sigh of relief upon hearing his latest words.»

This is one of the reasons why artificialcontraception has had such damage upon marriages and relationships: the couple deliberately withhold their fertility and so no longer give themselves completely to each other; in doing this they deny not just the meaning of sex itself but they also subtract from loving one of its «givens» - the orientation towards giving oneself completely to one's spouse.

Mut «a, a temporary marriage which may be terminated after even one day upon payment of a gift, is permitted among the Shi'as.

It's simple: You don't get to say what marriage is or is not based upon the bible or the so - called word of god (whatever that is... think about that for a minute... unless you speak 1st century aramaic you have no idea what the original writers of the ficto - mythic texts you now presume as the word of god even means!)

Based upon this observation, the cardinal makes two proposals: a more generous widening of the procedures for investigating the nullity of marriages and, invoking the criteria of mercy, a dispensation to allow, in certain cases,...

As we settle upon a state in life, some of us will receive holy orders or embark upon the sacrament of marriage.

Those who believed that Pope Francis» pastoral revolution presaged a doctrinal change in terms of marriage and family heaved a sigh of relief upon hearing his latest words.

Based upon this observation, the cardinal makes two proposals: a more generous widening of the procedures for investigating the nullity of marriages and, invoking the criteria of mercy, a dispensation to allow, in certain cases, the divorced and remarried to receive Holy Communion.

Although the American Catholic community has been confronted with yet more difficulties — ranging from the redefinition of marriage to assaults on religious liberty — one of the reasons for hope, moving forward, is that John Paul II left behind a rich spiritual and intellectual infrastructure for Americans to draw upon, to deal with these ongoing challenges.

We give thanks that Jesus bestowed upon him 55 years of marriage to the woman he loved — a woman who could match him at every step, and even hold him accountable.

Those of us who believe that human flourishing depends upon the recognition and honoring of marriage as exclusively the union of a man and a woman see this transformation of marriage into something radically different as a grave threat to human society and human happiness.

... a broken marriage is a broken marriage; something that stands out as an unnatural smashing of what was built to last, a blasphemy against the unity of Christ and his church, an amputation inflicted upon a living body....

Given this enlarging range of significant demands placed upon marriage, it's no puzzle that there are so many divorces.

In By the Shores of Silver Lake, Laura and her cousin Lena respond with horror upon hearing of the marriage of a homestead girl of thirteen years.

Inter-caste marriages are frowned upon and caste tags are still appended to the Christian names of high caste people.

Fox - Genovese complains that «many scholars project upon the past» their own views but falls prey to the same accusation, Neither book offers a history of marriage, but both use ideological interpretations of history and nature to argue for the norm of heterosexual marriage.

It is not the fruitfulness of marriage that he draws upon, not the possibility of procreation, but, in Audet's words, «an aspect which is in a sense much more radical, and which is more specifically human, namely that of love.

Possession and use are subpersonal and wholly alien to the spirit of dedication upon which marriage should be founded.

Building on whatever beginnings were made before marriage, newlyweds are working to finish the foundation upon which a lifetime of growing intimacy can be built.

What kind of country have we become when people who believe that marriage is for a man and a woman, are reviled and spit upon.

Among other significant ways that preliberal Christianity contributed to an expansion of human choice was to transform the idea of marriage from an institution based upon considerations of family and property to one based upon the choice and consent of individuals united in sacramental love.

Our education, service and advocacy depend upon the adequacy of our theological vision — the way we interpret Scripture and tradition regarding relations between women and men, sex, marriage, parenting and violence.

Upon first glance, First Things's sponsorship of the Marriage Pledge struck me as a noble endeavor, a brilliant attempt to distinguish between Christ's challenging teaching about marriage and the flimsy requirements of the statMarriage Pledge struck me as a noble endeavor, a brilliant attempt to distinguish between Christ's challenging teaching about marriage and the flimsy requirements of the statmarriage and the flimsy requirements of the state today.

Later, passing through the countryside, Juan happens upon a peasant wedding feast, seduces the new bride with promises of marriage, deflowers her, and then slips away back to Seville.

We'll first touch upon the graces that God communicates through marriage but only very briefly because this will be developed in a more personal way in some of the other talks.

-LSB-...] Marriage, the sacramental sign of marriage, brings about immediately between the spouses a bond that no longer depends upon their wills because now it is a gift God has given to themMarriage, the sacramental sign of marriage, brings about immediately between the spouses a bond that no longer depends upon their wills because now it is a gift God has given to themmarriage, brings about immediately between the spouses a bond that no longer depends upon their wills because now it is a gift God has given to them.»

But some of the States will recognize these varieties of marriage, and soon the old questions will be upon us again: Can the two widows, or the father and the daughter, take their marriages and their federal benefits into a State that does not recognize their marriages?

The parables disclose with what pleasure and tolerance he surveyed the broad scene of human activity: the merchant seeking pearls; the farmer sowing his fields; the real - estate man trying to buy a piece of land in which he had secret reason to believe a treasure lay buried; the dishonest secretary, who had been given notice, making friends against the evil day among his employer's debtors by reducing their obligations; the five young women sleeping with lamps burning while the bridegroom tarried and unable to attend the marriage because their sisters who had had foresight enough to bring additional oil refused to lend them any; the rich man whose guests for dinner all made excuses; the man comfortably in bed with his children who gets up at midnight to help his importunate neighbor only because he despairs of getting rid of him otherwise; the king who is out to capture a city; the man who built his house upon the sand and lost it in the first storm of wind and rain; the queer employer who pays all of his men the same wage whether they have worked the whole day or a single hour; the great lord who going to a distant land entrusts his property to his three servants and judges them by the success of their investments when he returns; the shepherd whose sheep falls into a ditch; the woman with ten pieces of silver who, losing one, lights the candle and sweeps diligently till she finds it, and makes the finding of it the occasion of a celebration in which all of her neighbors are invited to share — and how long such a list might be!

The family unit, resting upon the ideal of lifelong monogamous heterosexual marriage, was the ultimate source of the evil and was to be the primary targeted in the sexual revolution.

We made some suggestions towards a synthesis of this vision with some of John Paul II's insights in our March 2009 editorial, «The Assault upon the Sexes: Fostering the Papal Defence», and would also refer to Luke Gormally's pieces in our March 2006 issue, «Marriage and the Prophylactic use of condoms» and in our March 2004 issue, «Marriage, the true environment for sexual love».

The justification of such benefits can only be based upon marriage being in the common good.

The Pope posed the question: «Does the Apostle perhaps look upon marriage exclusively from the viewpoint of a remedy for concupiscence, as used to be said in traditional theological language?

Similarly, the status of the human embryo, and the value placed upon it, have come under increasing scrutiny over the past decades, and even since DP in 2008 it has become increasingly normal to assume that it is morally acceptable to destroy embryos or to experiment upon them.12 The increasing sense of a loss of respect for human life in its earliest stages is linked to the abandonment of male - female lifelong marriage as the normal structure in which human life begins and is cherished.13 DP emphasises that «human procreation is a personal act of a husband and wife, which is not capable of substitution» (DP 16).

Before we get to the trickiest sexual questions, based upon what many people are already doing, our book deals with marriage in the context of friendship, men's and women's roles and responsibilities and how to deal with sin so that marriage gets better rather than bitter.

Indeed, it has been supposed by some that the teraphim, household gods, (Genesis 35:4; 31:19; 30 - 35; I Samuel 15:23; 19:13, 16; II Kings 23:24) were originally images of ancestors; that they were honored as such and were part of the apparatus of popular religion; (Hosea 3:4) that mortuary customs which the prophetic school later condemned grew up around them; (Cf. Deuteronomy 26:13 - 14) that the right of performing the necessary ceremonies for one's ancestors devolved upon a son and that this fact underlay both the sense of tragedy in being sonless and the practices of levirate marriage and of adoption to avoid such disaster; (Cf. Genesis 15:2 - 3; 30:3 - 8; Deuteronomy 25:5 - 10) and that this set of ideas and customs was an integral part of the whole clan organization of early Israel.

Husbands and wives can be partners in a marriage based upon a sincere and radical giving of self on the part of both spouses, a giving that results in mutual submission.