Sentences with phrase «upon a person doing»

A person who forces intimacies from and upon people he doesn't actually care about, he massages Alex's shoulders even as he advises him to «forget about your life» and concentrate on work.

You have said it was based on coming upon a person doing yoga on the beach.

Not exact matches

(See How to Deal with Time Wasters) Such sessions rarely accomplish anything except maybe some pseudo-bonding; they don't have a logical and clearly - understood endpoint so they seem both pointless and interminable; and, most often, they sorta drool to a conclusion without agreed - upon action items and / or documented next steps for at least half the people in the room.

Once you decipher a person's motives, you can adequately show respect for their beliefs and, upon doing so have them listen to your point - of - view in a more open minded manner.

«They constitute an unpaid extension of the workday; they encroach upon things like family life and drinking with people with whom you don't share a copier,» wrote Lauren Collins for The New Yorker.

«Most people don't discuss miscarriages because you worry your problems will distance you or reflect upon you — as if you're defective or did something to cause this,» he wrote.

I hope that it does inspire a lot of people, any minority who's been preyed upon in this way to speak up and feel confident that they can speak up.»

«For example,» says Wolfe, ««I think you have the potential to be a fantastic leader and to have three people work under you... but in order to do that, I think we need to improve upon your time - management skills, your organization skills,» vs. coming at them saying, «You're disorganized.»

«People are less inhibited, and they then will engage in things they would want to do all the time but wouldn't normally because it would be frowned upon in their social circles.»

«Whatever those two people want to do — may it be to give company at a dinner or end up in bed together — is a private matter and should be agreed upon in the chat before meeting,» Poppenreiter told TechCrunch.

«Most people don't acknowledge this, but corruption in Russia has become its own institution, upon which all other institutions run,» Friedman writes in an introduction to the work.

Zuckerberg and Sandberg have been happy to amass great wealth and power relying upon other people's money and the public's trust, but they do not want to be accountable to those who supply the needed resources.

Dotzler, who does not have a technical background, took it upon himself to act as a liaison between nontechies willing to serve as bug reporters and the programmers — helping to get the former up to speed and the latter to be more forgiving, and thus bringing thousands of new people into the project.

What do you tell people in South Carolina that, given all the things we discovered here, it's a good idea for us to rely upon you to regulate your own business practices?

When I look at decisions to expand my business, if I look to hire new people, the reason I make the decision to do that is based upon what the economic climate is going to be and the economic activity of my industry,» said Rowen.

«As a small - business person, I do not make many of my economic decisions based upon tax policy.

Yet upon graduating, few jobs are available to young people — and those that are open often don't require a college degree.

Marketers have a responsibility to observe and act upon what people react to, but it's important not to conflate «everybody can't stop talking about this» with «we should do something similar.»

But even though technology may not destroy jobs in aggregate, it does force change upon many people.

We haven't even touched upon how many people can save a ton of money going to a public school like I did or attend community college for two years and then transfer to a public school for even more savings.

But «you can't tell millions upon millions of people to evacuate without giving them any real way to do so

But «you can't tell millions upon millions of people to evacuate without giving them any real way to do so,» she notes.

Although the Chief Justice acknowledged that this argument had some merit, the more determinative factor — and the key difference between the statutory immunity provisions relied upon by the ERCB and Alberta Environment — was that the immunity clause with respect to the former explicitly contemplated the regulator as an entity («the Board or a member of the Board...») whereas the immunity provisions under the Water Act and the EPEA did not (referring only to «persons» in various capacities; see paras 62 — 71).

In addition to all of the benefits that are given to a person with a ProTrader account this level user will also get an advanced signal service, access to an auto trading program, a 100 % bonus upon signup, an account cash back feature and all this is done on a dedicated VIP platform.

So, what you need to do when hiring employees is to look out for people who can work with little or no supervision, and those that are trustworthy and can easily be relied upon.

Then do what you agreed upon (e.g. meet in person / get the fiat through a wire transfer, etc.).

Bill Slawski of SEOByTheSea — «I'm a firm believer in creating a situation where not only are you focusing upon a permission - based approach, but that you also provide things of such value within your email marketing that people don't think twice about signing up, and wouldn't even consider unsubscribing.

«While Doug Ford would take an erratic and reckless approach and fire Hydro One's board — which would absolutely do nothing to reduce customer rates, but would almost certainly risk the market value of Hydro One upon which so many people rely — we believe in a stable solution that exercises our authority as the largest shareholder.»

Provocative competence means to do it, like Miles Davis did in Kind of Blue, is you sort of throw people in over their head upon occasion.

I grew up in an ultra-orthodox Jewish neighborhood in Brooklyn, NY and I guess the only thing that infuriates me is these ultra-orthodox Jewish «chasidim» individuals will look upon a person, such as myself, as a gentile vs. a Jew only because I don't worship or practive the faith as they do.

No matter was good your doing, to say that that is betowing «personal freedoms» and «human rights» upon people is not accurate.

These people earn their living soothing those trampled upon and those doing the trampling.

A person who didn't consider family before embarking upon a political career, who simply didn't care about the impact of that decision on his or her spouse and children, would be some sort of monster.

So many religious well intended people want to impress God and religion upon others with various beliefs and arguments that include you will, «burn in hell if you don't» or other not so harsh or threatening consequences.

Nobody has any confidence in that kind of future, and people feel put upon in having to tie their security to risky investments they don't really understand.

«Foreknowledge» then does not refer to God's actual knowledge of anything beforehand, rather it refers to God's setting His intimate affection and favor upon His people beforehand.

Dismissing religion as fairy tales doesn't address the fact that millions of people take their religious beliefs very seriously and make decisions and take action based upon those beliefs.

If one doesn't believe it, however, he is in conflict not merely with the argument of To Empower People but with the assumption of self - governance upon which the American experiment in republican democracy is constituted.

The point is not trying to force people to believe the same as the atheist; the point is to respect all people, allow them to live as they believe best, and do not allow people in positions of power or government to force their religious beliefs upon others.

2 Chron 8:7 - 8,16 All the people that were left of the Hitt.ites, and the Amorites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, who were not of Israel, their children that were left after them in the land, whom the children of Israel had not destroyed, upon them did Solomon impose tribute - service until this day.

(Isa 44:3) Just as streams of water nor blessings is a person, so neither is God's holy spirit, but rather that which can be» poured out» upon different people to accomplish the work assigned by Jehovah, empowering them to do so.

Let me clarify... I know good Muslim people who I do not believe would wish harm upon another person.

Gods judgment rest upon all the corporate and local churches temples, tabernacles, TV evangelists, ministries and congregations ever for all their false teachings and deeds, and God does not want any of His people to suffer the spiritual plagues which are being brought upon them.

Living does not equal having legal rights that trump those of the person upon whom the fetus is dependent.

And while I don't know the stories of all the millions upon millions of people who no longer attend a Sunday morning gathering, I do know the stories of a couple hundred of them, and by far, most of them have grown closer in their walk with Jesus than they ever had when they were sitting in a pew on Sunday morning.

I now believe it does a tremendous disservice to honorable people who are faithful believers to place on them the additional burden of guilt, shame and magnified suffering that comes from the kind of doctrine that promotes (sells) prayer as a magic talisman which will somehow change God's mind, alter physical circumstance, and fix intractable problems — if only the one praying has enough faith or asks in the right way or lives a holy enough life or professes Jesus enough or waits patiently or never gives up or any of a hundred different gotchas that can be called upon to justify the lack of an affirmative answer.

BUT they usually don't seem to realize or want to talk about the fact that ideas have consequences, and that believing or not believing in the ideas of Calvin has a major impact upon our daily walk and the way we view God, ourselves, and the people in our world.

Now, realize that in today's society you are still just as hated, shunned and looked down upon for declaring that same differing belief... or even non-belief — just because people are still too hung up on their precious religious dogma to realize that, though the outcome is obviously less drastic than in the past, they are still doing the same thing that religious people did in the past?

Once upon a time people were happy enough with their religious faith and did not have to boast about proof....

Are oppressed people ever going to be able to affirm judgment like Isaiah did when he declared: «For behold, the Lord is coming forth out of his place to punish the inhabitants of the earth for their iniquity and the earth will disclose the blood shed upon her, and will no more cover her slain» (26:21)?