None of them should be relied
upon as statements of fact.
Not exact matches
We recognize the absurdity
of taking that sentence
as a bare, literal
statement of fact, although one conspicuous «theory»
of the atonement was based
upon such an understanding
of it.
In
fact, in the
statement by which Schweitzer comes nearest to hinting that Jesus discerned its presence, he uses the simile
of the shadow: «It is present only
as a cloud may be said to be present which throws its shadow
upon the earth; its nearness, that is to say, is recognized by the paralysis
of the Kingdom
of Satan.
It is a tough task to challenge such fascism crimes;
As a victim
of a series
of fascism crimes associated with Udacity cofounder Sebastian Thrun along with this criminal suspect Gabriele Scheler, and the likes, what I posted on the web are no more than
facts,
facts those fascists I challenged dare never officially deny, either publicly or in private; I bet such
of their fascism crimes would not be tolerated anywhere in human society; If anyone disagree, especially those in my public challenge, please give us a candid answer right here on this board, which part in my
statements is not base
upon facts?
It was a bold decision, and one that Chaplin considered an artistic
statement, but knowing now
as we do the atrocities visited
upon the Jews it's difficult to appreciate much
of the humour because it appears to gloss over reality when, in
fact, it was written in ignorance
of the
facts.
(1) A credit services organization, its salespersons, agents, and representatives, and independent contractors who sell or attempt to sell the services
of a credit services organization may not do any
of the following: (a) conduct any business regulated by this chapter without first: (i) securing a certificate
of registration from the division; and (ii) unless exempted under Section 13 -21-4, posting a bond, letter
of credit, or certificate
of deposit with the division in the amount
of $ 100,000; (b) make a false
statement, or fail to state a material
fact, in connection with an application for registration with the division; (c) charge or receive any money or other valuable consideration prior to full and complete performance
of the services the credit services organization has agreed to perform for the buyer; (d) dispute or challenge, or assist a person in disputing or challenging an entry in a credit report prepared by a consumer reporting agency without a factual basis for believing and obtaining a written
statement for each entry from the person stating that that person believes that the entry contains a material error or omission, outdated information, inaccurate information, or unverifiable information; (e) charge or receive any money or other valuable consideration solely for referral
of the buyer to a retail seller who will or may extend credit to the buyer, if the credit that is or will be extended to the buyer is
upon substantially the same terms
as those available to the general public; (f) make, or counsel or advise any buyer to make, any
statement that is untrue or misleading and that is known, or that by the exercise
of reasonable care should be known, to be untrue or misleading, to a credit reporting agency or to any person who has extended credit to a buyer or to whom a buyer is applying for an extension
of credit, with respect to a buyer's creditworthiness, credit standing, or credit capacity; (g) make or use any untrue or misleading representations in the offer or sale
of the services
of a credit services organization or engage, directly or indirectly, in any act, practice, or course
of business that operates or would operate
as fraud or deception
upon any person in connection with the offer or sale
of the services
of a credit services organization; and (h) transact any business
as a credit services organization,
as defined in Section 13 -21-2, without first having registered with the division by paying an annual fee set pursuant to Section 63J -1-504 and filing proof that it has obtained a bond or letter
of credit
as required by Subsection (2).
If the wife subsequently refuses to testify, whether or not it is just to admit
as hearsay evidence the
statement she made to the police depends
upon the
facts of the individual case.
It is not information or
facts as contemplated by s. 724 because, at the point when the right to make a dock
statement is invoked, the evidentiary part
of the sentence hearing under s. 724 has concluded and the
facts, either agreed
upon or found by the judge, are binding.
(
as part
of DPA negotiations) there is a risk that matters which an authority seeks to include in an agreed
statement of facts could be relied
upon against the company in parallel civil proceedings.
During settlement negotiations with the authorities, companies should be aware
of the risk that the
fact of a settlement,
as well
as any associated press coverage or documents (such
as a
statement of facts in a DPA), may raise awareness
of potential civil claims, and in certain circumstances may even be relied
upon to support such claims.
While the Respondent argued that the decision to proceed by special case was a discretionary one to which deference was owed, the Appellants argued that the special case was not appropriate because: the questions posed in the special case rested on a hypothetical assumption that the agreements were valid; necessary
facts were not included and not all the
facts were agreed
upon by the parties; and the parties did not sign the
statement of special case
as required by Rule 9 - 3 (3)(c).
A
statement of opinion need not be based
upon fact at all; an opinion is not claimed
as factual; it is just an opinion, one person's perception
of what could be based
upon information that you and I are not privy to.
A liar «knows» that his / her
statement is a lie, whereas a so - called lie can be put forth in ignorance
of the truth
of the matter, rendering said
statement as an incorrect
statement based
upon said ignorance
of the
facts.