@Karen Margrave I think we are saying basically the same thing, but I still contend that the theory holds true unless acted
upon by outside influences ie.
Not exact matches
Unlike previous research in this area, which was affected
by external environmental factors that impacted
upon metabolic profiling, sheep in this study were monitored in a well - controlled setting, negating any
outside influences.
The appeals court rejected Sienkowski's argument, holding that under Indiana law a party can not attack the validity of a verdict
by juror testimony about jury deliberations unless it relates to (1) drug or alcohol use
by any juror, (2) the question of whether extraneous prejudicial information was improperly brought to the jury's attention or (3) whether any
outside influence was improperly brought to bear
upon any juror.
With the very narrow, newly created exception for guilty verdicts in criminal cases reached based
upon racial or other kinds of impermissible prejudice rather than the facts of the case (or cases where there is an
outside influence on the jury such as a bribe or someone looking up facts or law on the Internet), no one can challenge a jury verdict based
upon the reasoning and conclusions actually made
by the jurors, even if someone learns that the jury knowingly or accidentally didn't follow the law or was mistaken about the facts.