The question, then, of apparent evil is not whether Whitehead's God builds
upon every evil in the attempt to perfect the world and Godself.
Not exact matches
In my head, I saw the bank as an
evil entity, having no mercy for a hard - working, widowed mom who had come
upon hard times.
In another, a scruffy bearded man peers through a set of blinds, his sinister eyes burning in anticipation of the evil deeds he will inflict upon the home's occupants — a home he found through a real estate brokerage's website, presumabl
In another, a scruffy bearded man peers through a set of blinds, his sinister eyes burning
in anticipation of the evil deeds he will inflict upon the home's occupants — a home he found through a real estate brokerage's website, presumabl
in anticipation of the
evil deeds he will inflict
upon the home's occupants — a home he found through a real estate brokerage's website, presumably.
Live
in Switzerland, where going against common sense is extremely frowned
upon as an objective
evil.
Atheism makes claim that
in our darkest hours we are the ones with the ability to move forward, that we can make those paths and not wait for a deity to come
upon us and clear the land of its
evils.
The fact is, that a good man who happens to yell the wrong name
in his prayers is damned, while an
evil man who calls genuinely
upon the right name is saved.
And then Jesus came
upon his disciples and said, «What's this shit I've been hearing about me being a human sacrifice for your sins!!? Who
in the goddamned hell came up with that Neanderthal bullshit!!!? What are we, living
in the fucking Stone Age!!!!? Blood sacrifice!!!!!!!!!!!?? Are you fucking kidding me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??? Listen, brethren, thou can takest that pathetic, immoral, sadistic,
evil, sickening, disgusting pile of Cro - Magnon donkey shit and shove it straight up thy fucking asses!!!»
To expand
upon that «logic» — our currency does indeed display «
In God We Trust» on it... and money is the root of all
evil.
His judgment
upon that
evil out of context confuses those that do not know the scriptures
in context.
In this post, I consider a question sent in to me by a reader about whether or not God can look upon sin and evi
In this post, I consider a question sent
in to me by a reader about whether or not God can look upon sin and evi
in to me by a reader about whether or not God can look
upon sin and
evil.
«I also will choose their delusions, and will bring their fears
upon them; because when I called, none did answer; when I spake, they did not hear: but they did
evil before mine eyes, and chose that
in which I delighted not.»
In this kind of theodicy Gethesemane, the cross, and the resurrection are important foci for understanding the depths of God's love, who, in creating an unimaginatively complex matrix of matter eventuating finally in persons able to choose to go against God's intentions, nonetheless grieves for and suffers with this beloved creation, both in the pain its natural course brings all its creatures and in the evil that its human creatures inflict upon i
In this kind of theodicy Gethesemane, the cross, and the resurrection are important foci for understanding the depths of God's love, who,
in creating an unimaginatively complex matrix of matter eventuating finally in persons able to choose to go against God's intentions, nonetheless grieves for and suffers with this beloved creation, both in the pain its natural course brings all its creatures and in the evil that its human creatures inflict upon i
in creating an unimaginatively complex matrix of matter eventuating finally
in persons able to choose to go against God's intentions, nonetheless grieves for and suffers with this beloved creation, both in the pain its natural course brings all its creatures and in the evil that its human creatures inflict upon i
in persons able to choose to go against God's intentions, nonetheless grieves for and suffers with this beloved creation, both
in the pain its natural course brings all its creatures and in the evil that its human creatures inflict upon i
in the pain its natural course brings all its creatures and
in the evil that its human creatures inflict upon i
in the
evil that its human creatures inflict
upon it.
Jesus called
upon his hearer to break radically with the present
evil aeon, and to rebuild his life
in commitment to the inbreaking kingdom.
But I think there is some risk that it might be misconstrued so as to obscure certain truths which I believe to be fundamental: that the Passion is the moment at which that complete oneness with the Father which is the unique and all - pervading characteristic of the life of Jesus is paradoxically manifested; that it is at that moment, above all, that Jesus discloses to us God himself
in action; that the judgement passed on Jesus and the testing brought to bear
upon him are a judgement and a testing exercised (of course, within the permissive will of God) by
evil men, or, to use mythological language, by the devil; and that the judgement of God pronounced at Calvary is that which Christ's accepting love passes
upon those men, and
upon ourselves as sharers
in their sinfulness, by showing up their sin
in all its hatefulness.
This self love is sin.God never forced chaos on us.we gave
in to satan's lies about
evil being an inherent necessity.Jesus said he was the way, the truth and life.He was the life (love) that everyone craves for, he is the truth which meant that his love was our only need and he exposed the lies of satan that we could attain bliss on subordinating people to our cravings.Sinning people don't accept a God who requires us to renounce ourselves because they are not convinced of God's love being enough for them and they are afraid to destroy their identity and live for the Glory of God.So,
upon death, these souls realize that the physical world was just a shadow of God's love (the nature, food etc) and their own lies (violence, self love etc) and realize that love is their only need.They pursue it from other soul beings but are hurt that there's only hate and self love.They are afraid to approach the light because they don't want to renounce their identity as they have not recognized God's love before.
Facts will never render decisions between ill - conceived alternatives; and the meaning of such terms as omnipotence or goodness depends
in second - type theism
upon a number of conceptions which have not been clearly considered
in the classic discussions (such as the marvelous one
in Hume's Dialogues) of the relations of such terms to the facts of
evil.
The dreadful
evil, the crime committed, God himself takes it
upon himself and will manifest it
in his Son Jesus Christ.
Jeremiah, pouring out before God everything he felt, poured out his vindictiveness: «Bring
upon them the day of
evil, and destroy them with double destruction»; (Jeremiah 17:18) «Deliver up their children to the famine, and give them over to the power of the sword; and let their wives become childless, and widows; and let their men be slain of death, and their young men smitten of the sword
in battle....
In between the self - righteous avoidance of the
evil of others and the acceptance and willing of
evil lies the difficult path of taking
evil upon oneself without being corrupted by it and transforming it into love.
One might almost say that what «determines» God's action
in a given circumstance is that God takes
upon himself the
evil and the misery of man.
A crucial judgment that the church must make is whether to reject their offerings because of their ambiguous character and radical demands or to seize
upon them as an occasion for repentance for that
in our history which now appears
evil to so many sensitive critics.
= NO Book of Jasher tells us that all the men who walked
in the ways of the Lord died
in those days, before the Lord brought the
evil upon man which he declared, for this was from the Lord, that they should NOT see the
evil which the Lord spoke of concerning the sons of men.
The
evil of the world is that those elements which are translucent so far as transmission is concerned,
in themselves are of slight weight; and that those elements with individual weight, by their discord, impose
upon vivid immediacy the obligation that it fade into night.
Insofar as our own culture participates
in — indeed, is founded
upon — structures of systemic
evil, a happy outcome of our difficulties, as opposed to other people's difficulties, ought not be expected
in the Christian view.
Yet if the record
in the Synoptic Gospels is to be trusted, he did not, like Paul, look
upon sin as an enveloping state of
evil resulting from Adam's fall and corrupting man's whole being.
5 But after thy hardness and impenitent heart treasurest up unto thyself wrath against the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God; 6 Who will render to every man according to his deeds: 7 To them who by patient continuance
in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life: 8 But unto them that are contentious, and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath, 9 Tribulation and anguish,
upon every soul of man that doeth
evil, of the Jew first, and also of the Gentile; Romans 2:1 - 9 (KJV)
On the whole, the Latin races have leaned more towards the former way of looking
upon evil, as made up of ills and sins
in the plural, removable
in detail; while the Germanic races have tended rather to think of Sin
in the singular, and with a capital S, as of something ineradicably ingrained
in our natural subjectivity, and never to be removed by any superficial piecemeal operations.
When an enemy wishes
evil upon our heads, we pray for something bad to happen to them
in return.
The whole weight of the
evil that was resident
in the situation fell
upon Him.
The
evil itself lies
in the intention: «The project of the sin and the reflecting
upon it and not its execution is the real guilt.»
Not the conception or intellectual perception of
evil, but the grisly blood - freezing heart - palsying sensation of it close
upon one, and no other conception or sensation able to live for a moment
in its presence.
Based
upon the absolute belief
in the primacy of the spirit, it taught that only spirit is truly real; consequently such things as
evil and pain really do not exist.
Sometimes the picture of hell has been painted
in lurid fashion, with ghastly punishment inflicted
upon «lost» persons; more frequently, at least
in recent theological writing, this aspect has been muted or denied, and stress has been put on such ideas as persistence after death apart from God's presence — or even
in that presence, which for the utterly unworthy man or woman would be horrifying, as when an
evil person is compelled to be with someone whom he or she deeply hates.
He called
upon the Church to «repent of the sins of existing society, cast off the spell of lies protecting our social wrongs, have faith
in a higher social order, and realize
in ourselves a new type of Christian manhood which seems to overcome the
evil in the present world, not by withdrawing from the world, but by revolutionizing it.»
Third, Christians were experiencing wave
upon wave of valid criticism for their historical roles
in promoting such
evils as anti-Judaism, colonialism, racism, patriarchalism, anthropocentrism, homophobia, and sexual repression.
Whether heeding rational life or the creative will, both Whitehead and Nietzsche feel called
upon to transform the worldly character of time and becoming
in order to overcome the
evil of time and to explain the finally good life.
He echoes Mason by taking his defense from the Old Testament, presenting the English — typically — as the put -
upon underdog
in a crusade against
Evil:
The first is
in the destruction which He visits
upon intolerable
evil.
Rauschenbusch presumed the solidarity of humankind, and focused
upon the effects of that solidarity
in the transmission of sin such that each generation is predisposed to
evil.
(Adventures of Ideas, New York: The Free Press, 1967, 257) These discordant feelings,
in themselves destructive and
evil, make a contribution by producing «the positive feeling of a quick shift of aim from the tameness of outworn perfection to some other ideal with its freshness still
upon it.»
Each new event rests back
upon and is an expression of, while it also provides genuine fulfillment for, the originative and final purpose which is divine —
in one sense, even the «
evil» occasion has this reference, although God is not «responsible» for it.
In this picture redemption of
evil follows from and depends
upon redemption of the sin for which the
evil was the punishment.
Only the full experience of this capacity can bestow
upon human affairs faith and hope, those two essential characteristics of human existence which Greek antiquity ignored altogether, discounting the keeping of faith as a very uncommon and not too important virtue and counting hope among the
evils of illusion
in Pandora's box.
First of all, we may say that
in our personal lives we are called
upon to resist the powers of death, disease, and
evil.
God could also mediate the free actions of such souls to one another, taking care to harmonize any potential conflicts by means of conceptual supplementation, thus overcoming any
evil consequent
upon the free actions of many actualities acting
in concert.
Such hope prohibits other worldly withdrawal, but calls
upon us to redouble our efforts to achieve the good
in this world with all its ambiguities for good and
evil.
God has addressed his messages to generations through chosen one's to remind and warn those
evil doers and the ones who are astray to come back to the truth but when messanger gives up on his people God would bring
upon them heavy natural disasters, losses and grieves... there among any religions or branches of religions you will find people worship and do good deeds for the sake of God and would do all could to raise his name and belief... there are others who careless for it as a religion or faith but taking advantage of the posts for their own personal vast interest or the gangs interests as named by you... «Those are as a Walves using the Sheeps Skins
in Disguise for hunting and feeding its greeds».
45So that you will become the children of your Father who is
in Heaven, for his sun rises on the good and
upon the
evil and his rain descends on the just and on the unjust.
In political and social thought, no Christian has ever written a more profound defense of the democratic idea and its component parts, such as the dignity of the person, the sharp distinction between society and the state, the role of practical wisdom, the common good, the transcendent anchoring of human rights, transcendent judgment upon societies, and the interplay of goodness and evil in human individuals and institution
In political and social thought, no Christian has ever written a more profound defense of the democratic idea and its component parts, such as the dignity of the person, the sharp distinction between society and the state, the role of practical wisdom, the common good, the transcendent anchoring of human rights, transcendent judgment
upon societies, and the interplay of goodness and
evil in human individuals and institution
in human individuals and institutions.
In my (abandoned) theory, I argued that the Old Testament portrays God holding back disasters
upon people until, as a result of their great
evil, they departed from God's protective hand.