However, it is clear that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the Northern Territory have an ongoing vulnerability to laws infringing
upon their human rights, and that constitutional rights protection mechanisms should not be left to the benevolence of a particular government.
There are four aspects of the NTA that impact
upon the human rights of Indigenous people and their relationship to sea country.
For me as Social Justice Commissioner, specifically charged by statute to report on the effect of the Native Title Act
upon the human rights of Indigenous Australians, the challenge is to develop a framework that recognises the distinctiveness of Indigenous identity as it is shaped by our adherence to traditional laws and customs, while at the same time seeking to maximise the capacity of native title to contribute to the economic and social development of traditional owner groups and the communities they live in.
There is no doubt that random testing policies can infringe
upon human rights and raise privacy issues, but the evidence put forward in these cases suggests that, if the threshold tests for safety and risk in a workplace discussed above are met, appropriate policy design may alleviate most concerns arising from those areas.
Unlike other jurisdictions which rely upon mandatory quota and affirmative action schemes to ensure more acceptable rates of employment amongst their handicapped citizens, Canadian governments have relied
upon human rights legislation.
This, then, is our background context, and we'd best remember it when calling
upon human rights to argue against fracking.
As the Press Association reports, in a heated and occasionally ill - tempered debate at the gathering in Birmingham, party members passed a motion condemning the system of police accreditation, arguing it infringed
upon their human rights.
«The bill doesn't touch
upon the human rights of the LGBT community,» said the initiator of the bill, United Russia deputy Vitaly Milonov.
Not exact matches
«We call
upon the international community to hold the Sudanese authorities to account for the safety of these
human rights defenders.
No matter was good your doing, to say that that is betowing «personal freedoms» and «
human rights»
upon people is not accurate.
Animal -
rights activists are up in arms about a recent statement by Peter Singer ¯ a bioethics professor at Princeton's Center for
Human Values who was, once
upon a time, beloved by those activists for his 1975 book Animal Liberation.
The openhearted observer of Islam in the West can discern the shape of hope in the increasing willingness of people of the two faiths to come together for dialogue and consultation on the mutual problems they face; in the reevaluation of Islam forced
upon Muslims by their minority status in many places; and in the development of the concept of international law and universal
human rights.
Now the relevance of Jesus to the issue of
human rights, often missed as Christian religion, is touched
upon by Durant quite interestingly:
For example — Often used by many christians as an arguement for intolerence towards
human rights... I pose that every religiously ran nation like that of Iran and Iraq are exactly what the religious in this supposedly tolerent country wish to turn this country into, where science and logically thought are frowned
upon and knowledge of fairy tales are rewarded.
The crucifying impact of sin on the whole
human race will inevitably have a devastating impact
upon the sacred humanity of Christ precisely because he is - by
right, vocation and very ontology - ourfinal and plenary union with God.
That is to say, salvation depends finally
upon right human action in response to God's gracious Torah, and Jesus» function is simply to re-present that Law as it exists primordially in the mind of God — not to create a new possibility for
human existence.
Our commitment to
human rights, if it is to be sustained, must depend not on practice, law, or the passing policies of governments (though we must be earnestly concerned about all of these), but rather on a promise that bestows dignity
upon every person and demands of every person a respect — no, a reverence — for the dignity of all others.
In this understanding,
human rights are not founded
upon a myth about a «natural state of innocence.»
Nonetheless, the Berns thesis does throw some doubt
upon the generous and affectionate thesis about the American founding propounded by the genial Catholic philosopher Jacques Maritain, one of the thinkers who prepared the way for the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights.
This obligation is qualified only by the principle that parents may not make grossly unjust demands
upon the child, on pain of interference by the state as guardian of basic
human rights.
«We call
upon the Iranian authorities to release Pastor Nadarkhani and demonstrate a commitment to basic, universal
human rights, including freedom of religion.»
You can check out your favorite stores on BetterWorldShopper.org (they have an app, too, if you want to check it on the go) where they grade companies A-F (just like in school) based
upon 5 issues:
human rights, environment, animal protection, community involvement and social justice.
While our
rights tradition stems from a belief in a moral order independent of government, a strong case can be made that our system of limited and dispersed power depends even more profoundly
upon an appreciation of
human imperfectibility.
The individual in a
human society in process of collective organization has not the
right to remain inactive, that is to say, not to seek to develop himself to his fullest extent: because
upon his individual perfection depends the perfection of all his fellows.
Their principles of
human rights and their restraints
upon royal misconduct had found embodiment in the nation's constitution.
The essay will no doubt become an important guide in the public debate on Israel and its critics, for it outlines the complexity of an issue that touches
upon politics,
human rights and religion.
«
Human rights» indeed exist today as parasites
upon the decaying body of Christendom.
In political and social thought, no Christian has ever written a more profound defense of the democratic idea and its component parts, such as the dignity of the person, the sharp distinction between society and the state, the role of practical wisdom, the common good, the transcendent anchoring of
human rights, transcendent judgment
upon societies, and the interplay of goodness and evil in
human individuals and institutions.
Because belief empowered and shaped political life, they granted all religions the
right of free exercise, and knowing the
human desire to dominate, they courageously insisted that government not infringe
upon religious life.
So in case what has been expounded here is correct, in case there is no incommensurability in a
human life, and what there is of the incommensurable is only such by an accident from which no consequences can be drawn, in so far as existence is regarded in terms of the idea, Hegel is
right; but he is not
right in talking about faith or in allowing Abraham to be regarded as the father of it; for by the latter he has pronounced judgment both
upon Abraham and
upon faith.
I am just frustrated with the canned answers that the anti-abortionisits, who yes, do happen to be a good portion of the christian
right, give based off of a book, when there are far more, pressing problems in our society of fully agreed
upon «alive»
human beings.
All these developments, and in particular the drive under the WTO regime to make access to food mainly dependent
upon market mechanisms, are a threat to food security - the most fundamental of all
human rights.
This implies that we
human beings do not have the ability or
right to change or manipulate this immutable and eternal reality based
upon our own desire, whims or peccadilloes.
Lepard distinguishes between positivist legal traditions based
upon «state - oriented» values (emphasizing state sovereignty) and the more dynamic
human rights laws derived from common practices and understandings, including religio - ethical principles.
The 1985 Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Instruction on Respect for
Human Life states, «By virtue of its substantial union with a spiritual soul, the human body can not be... evaluated in the same way as the body of animals... The natural moral law expresses and lays down the purposes, rights and duties which are based upon the bodily and spiritual nature of the human person.&r
Human Life states, «By virtue of its substantial union with a spiritual soul, the
human body can not be... evaluated in the same way as the body of animals... The natural moral law expresses and lays down the purposes, rights and duties which are based upon the bodily and spiritual nature of the human person.&r
human body can not be... evaluated in the same way as the body of animals... The natural moral law expresses and lays down the purposes,
rights and duties which are based
upon the bodily and spiritual nature of the
human person.&r
human person.»
An important aspect of the law - abidingness of God's world is that
human beings affect one another; hence, intercessory prayer ought to lead to the putting forth of the
right stimulus
upon another by conversation, letter, gift, or any other form of communication that is open.
And it is undoubtedly true that maintaining concepts of absolute moral value, of objective
right and wrong is the only intelligible basis
upon which you can protect and promote the flourishing of every member of the
human community.
The relevance of these stories being run concurrently will become clearer
upon consideration of the
Human Rights Act (1998) and that the ECJ could, should United's lawyers consider it appropriate, rule that post match comments are a breach of a person's
Human Rights.
According to Josimar,
upon hearing from Bayern, chancellor Angela Merkel's government tasked
Human Rights Watch researchers about potential implications that could arise from a deal, and the group responded that one would pose «a serious risk to the club's reputation.»
It's a big
humans rights issue and if you feel parents should be allowed to do as they wish with their children why look down
upon female circ?
Mr Alfred Agbesi Woyome applied to the court arguing that his
human rights were being trampled
upon by Ghana in relation to the case in which he sued Ghana for abrogating a financial engineering services contract and was paid Gh?
And honestly, when you are taking it
upon yourself to repeal a piece of legislation called the
Human Rights Act, it's not a matter of fact which requires much substantiation.
It relies
upon a concatenation of treaty provisions, including Article 9 of the Charter of Fundamental
Rights of the European Union (CFR), which provides for a
right to «marry and... found a family», and Articles 12 and 14 of the European Convention on
Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), which protect the
right to marry and found a family and also prohibit discrimination.
However, in the process of reconciling with the Taliban, extreme care must be taken so as to preserve, even if not build
upon, the gains Afghanistan has made in the domains of
human rights in the last decade or so.
Prof. Kenneth Agyeman Attafuah, onetime Deputy Commissioner at CHRAJ, suggested that currently,
human rights and dignity was being trampled
upon, due to the failures of the two institutions.
United Nations
human rights experts have called
upon the US government and political leaders to «unequivocally and unconditionally» reject and condemn racist hate speech and crimes.
The warnings by NGOs, such as
Human Rights Watch in a coalition of 47 organizations in June that the UN was not sufficiently prepared for the elections and lacks «adequate and appropriate resources to protect civilians... and to avert election - related violence» (HRW 2011) were not acted
upon.
«Okeke has the
right to go to court to enforce his fundamental
human right which the people are trying to trample
upon.
It is a tough task to challenge such fascism crimes; As a victim of a series of fascism crimes associated with Udacity cofounder Sebastian Thrun along with this criminal suspect Gabriele Scheler, and the likes, what I posted on the web are no more than facts, facts those fascists I challenged dare never officially deny, either publicly or in private; I bet such of their fascism crimes would not be tolerated anywhere in
human society; If anyone disagree, especially those in my public challenge, please give us a candid answer
right here on this board, which part in my statements is not base
upon facts?
According to Doe Adjaho,
upon receiving the motion «I sought to satisfy myself to find out whether this matter is under investigation before the Commission on
Human Rights and Administration Justice.»